Pain relief and functional improvement remain 20 years after knee arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 470, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 144-149

  Meding, John B ^a   Meding, Lindsey K ^a   Ritter, Merrill A ^a   Keating, E Michael ^a  

^a CENTER FOR HIP AND KNEE SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PAIN; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VERY ELDERLY; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT; AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; EVALUATION; FITNESS; FOLLOW UP; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHYSICAL FITNESS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84865078014     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2123-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogan T, Yale C. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip: A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:228-241.
2. Bauman S, Williams D, Petruccelli D, Elliot W, de Beer J. Physical activity after total joint replacement; a cross-sectional survey. Clin J Sports Med. 2007;17:104-108.
3. Benjamin J, Johnson R, Porter S. Knee scores change with length of follow-up after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:867-871.
4. Callaghan JJ, Wells CW, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1635-1639.
5. Dahm DL, Barnes SA, Harrington JR, Sayeed SA, Berry DJ. Patient-reported activity level after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:401-407.
6. Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez D. Total knee replacement in young, active patients: Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79:575-582.
7. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:963-974.
8. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9-12.
9. Fisher N, Agarwal M, Reuben SF, Johnson DS, Turner PG. Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2006;13:296-300.
10. Font-RodriguezDE, ScuderiGR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:79-86.
11. Gill GS, Joshi AB. Long-term results of Kinematic Condylar knee replacement: An analysis of 404 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:355-358.
12. Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, Paul J, Dittus R, Croxford R, Katz B, Bombardier C, Heck D, Freund D. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement: Results of the Knee Replacement Patient Outcomes Research Team study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:163-173.
13. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248: 13-14.
14. Joshi AB, Gill GS, Smith PL. Outcome in patients lost to followup. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:149-153.
15. Konig A, Scheidler M, Rader C, Eulert J. The need for a dual rating system in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:161-167.
16. Ma HM, Lu YC, Ho FY, Huang CH. Long-term results of Total Condylar knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:580-584.
17. Malkani AL, Rand JA, Bryan RS, Wallrichs SL. Total knee arthroplasty with the Kinematic Condylar prosthesis: A ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:423-431.
18. Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:958-965.
19. NIH Consensus Panel. NIH consensus statement on total knee replacement December 8-10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86: 1328-1335.
20. Norman-Taylor FH, Palmer CR, Villar RN. Quality-of-life improvement compared after hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:74-77.
21. Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP. Total Condylar knee arthroplasty: A long-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:18-25.
22. Ritter MA. The Anatomical Graduated Component total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:745-749.
23. Ritter MA, Meneghini RM. Twenty-year survivorship of cementless Anatomic Graduated Component total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:507-513.
24. Ritter MA, Thong AE, Davis KE, Berend ME, Meding JB, Faris PM. Long-term deterioration of joint evaluation scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:438-442.
25. Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS. Total Condylar Knee replacement: A 20-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:10-17.
26. Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Northfield MR, Akizuki KH, Frankel RE, Belcher G, Amstutz HC. Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:54-59.
27. US National Center for Health Statistics. United States life tables. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2008;57:1-40.
28. US National Center for Health Statistics. Deaths: Final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009;57:1-136.
29. Wright J, Ewald FC, Walker PS, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB. Total knee arthroplasty with the Kinematic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:1003-1009.
30. Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:890-895.