Does a modified gap-balancing technique result in medial-pivot knee kinematics in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 470, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 91-98

  Fitz, Wolfgang ^a,b   Sodha, Sonal ^a   Reichmann, William ^a   Minas, Tom ^a,b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Cartilage Repair Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE RESECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR CONDYLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TENSION; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VARUS KNEE; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE LIGAMENT; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROTATION; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PILOT PROJECTS; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; POSTURAL BALANCE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROTATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIBIA; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84865075797     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2121-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Banks SA, Hodge WA. Accurate measurement of threedimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1996;43:638-649.
2. Bertin KC, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Hoff WA, Anderson DT, Langer T. In vivo determination of posterior femoral roll-back for subjects having a NexGen posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:1040-1048.
3. Bull AM, Kessler O, Alam M, Amis AA. Changes in knee kinematics reflect the articular geometry after arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2491-2499.
4. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE Jr, Ranawat CS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS, Lapp MA. In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: A multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:47-57.
5. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Scuderi G, Argenson JN, Insall J, Mahfouz M, Aubaniac JM, Haas B. In vivo three-dimensional determination of kinematics for subjects with a normal knee or a unicompartmental or total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(suppl 2):104-115.
6. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Walker SA, Cheal EJ, Stiehl JB. Femoral condylar lift-off in vivo in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:33-39.
7. Dennis DA, Mahfouz MR, Komistek RD, Hoff W. In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics. J Biomech. 2005;38:241-253.
8. Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA. Tibiofemoral movement 2: The loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1196-1198.
9. Insall J, Ranawat CS, Scott WN, Walker P. Total condylar knee replacement: Preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976; 120:149-154.
10. Johal P, Williams A, Wragg P, Hunt D, Gedroyc W. Tibiofemoral movement in the living knee: A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using ''interventional'' MRI. J Biomech. 2005;38:269-276.
11. Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, Komatsu T, Nakagawa S, Yamano Y. Effects of posterior cruciate ligament resection on the tibiofemoral joint gap. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391:210-217.
12. Kesman TJ, Kane PH, Kaufman KR, Trousdale RT. Caution required when using an intraoperative knee balancer in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:829-831.
13. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:69-81.
14. Kurosawa H, Walker PS, Abe S, Garg A, Hunter T. Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. J Biomech. 1985;18:487-499.
15. Mannan K, Scott G. The Medial Rotation total knee replacement: A clinical and radiological review at a mean follow-up of six years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:750-756.
16. Miyazaki Y, Nakamura T, Kogame K, Saito M, Yamamoto K, Suguro T. Analysis of the kinematics of total knee prostheses with a medial pivot design. J Arthroplasty. 2010 December 6 [Epub ahead of print].
17. Nozaki H, Banks SA, Suguro T, Hodge WA. Observations of femoral roll-back in cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:308-314.
18. Pinskerova V, Johal P, Nakagawa S, Sosna A, Williams A, Gedroyc W, Freeman MA. Does the femur roll-back with flexion? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:925-931.
19. Pritchett JW. Patient preferences in knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:979-982.
20. Pritchett JW. Patients prefer a bicruciate-retaining or the medial pivot total knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:224-228.
21. Schmidt R, Komistek RD, Blaha JD, Penenberg BL, Maloney WJ. Fluoroscopic analyses of cruciate-retaining and medial pivot knee implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:139-147.
22. Schnurr C, Csécsei G, Nessler J, Eysel P, Konig DP. How much tibial resection is required in total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop. 2011;35:989-994.
23. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA. Detrimental kinematics of a flat on flat total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;365:139-148.
24. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Paxson RD, Hoff WA. Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciateretaining knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;776:884-889.