Adoption of robotic surgery: An analogy from urologic oncology

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 30, Issue 23, 2012, Pages 2931-2932

  Sukumar, Shyam ^a   Sammon, Jesse ^a   Sun, Maxine ^b   Karakiewicz, Pierre I ^b   Trinh, Quoc Dien ^a,b  

^a HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; COMORBIDITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LETTER; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); ROBOTICS; SURGICAL MORTALITY; UNITED STATES;

ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84865066303     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: 15277755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.4895     Document Type: Letter

References (13)

1. Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET, et al: Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:783-791, 2012
2. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al: Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: Establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 168:945-949, 2002
3. Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, et al: Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: Results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 61:679-685, 2012
4. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, et al: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial short-term experience. Urology 50:854-857, 1997
5. Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, et al: The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 10:475-480, 2009
6. Menon M, Bhandari M, Gupta N, et al: Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. Eur Urol 58:838-846, 2010
7. Agarwal PK, Sammon J, Bhandari A, et al: Safety profile of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A standardized report of complications in 3317 patients. Eur Urol 59:684-698, 2011
8. Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al: Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 302:1557-1564, 2009
9. Hu JC, Wang Q, Pashos CL, et al: Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 26:2278-2284, 2008
10. Kowalczyk KJ, Levy JM, Caplan CF, et al: Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: Results from the 100% Medicare sample. Eur Urol 61:803-809, 2012
11. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al: Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27:5331-5336, 2009
12. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al: Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol 30:695-700, 2012
13. Leitao MM Jr: Potential pitfalls of the rapid uptake of new technology in surgery: Can comparative effectiveness research help? J Clin Oncol 30:767-769, 2012