How does TKA kinematics vary with transverse plane alignment changes in a contemporary implant?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 470, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 186-192

  Mihalko, William M ^a,b,c   Conner, Devin J ^b,c   Benner, Rodney ^a   Williams, John L ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b InMotion Orthopaedic Research Center   (United States)

^c University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

CLINICAL OBSERVATION; COMPUTER MODEL; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMUR; FEMUR CONDYLE; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; KNEE IMPLANT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE MALFORMATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLUOROSCOPY; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE MALALIGNMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LINEAR MODELS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84865065454     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2145-y     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Aglietti P, Sensi L, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A. Rotational position of femoral and tibial components in TKA using the femoral transepicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2751-2755.
2. Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:46-55.
3. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57-63.
4. Cobb JP, Dixon H, Dandachli W, Iranpour F. The anatomical tibial axis: reliable rotational orientation in knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1032-1038.
5. Gandhi R, Tso P, Davis A, Mahomed NN. Outcomes of total joint arthroplasty in academic versus community hospitals. Can J Surg. 2009;52:413-416.
6. Graw BP, Harris AH, Tripuraneni KR, Giori NJ. Rotational references for total knee arthroplasty tibial components change with level of resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2734-2738.
7. Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Math K, Dennis DA, Anderson DT. Correlation between condylar lift-off and femoral component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;403:143-152.
8. Johnson C, Hull ML. Parameter identification of the human lower limb under dynamic, transient torsional loading. J Biomech. 1988;21:401-415.
9. Kitagawa A, Tsumura N, Chin T, Gamada K, Banks SA, Kurosaka M. In vivo comparison of knee kinematics before and after high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:964-969.
10. Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Bertin KC, Rosenberg A, Kennedy W. In vivo determination of total knee arthroplasty kinematics: a multicenter analysis of an asymmetrical posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:41-50.
11. Li G, Suggs J, Hanson G, Durbhakula S, Johnson T, Freiberg A. Three-dimensional tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics of a cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:395-402.
12. Liow RY, Walker K, Wajid MA, Bedi G, Lennox CM. The reliability of the American Knee Society Score. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:603-608.
13. Mannion AF, Kampfen S, Munzinger U, Kramers-de Quervain I. The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11:R139.
14. Mikashima Y, Tomatsu T, Horikoshi M, Nakatani T, Saito S, Momohara S, Banks SA. In vivo deep-flexion kinematics in patients with posterior-cruciate retaining and anterior-cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010;25:83-87.
15. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2143-2149.
16. Prodromos CC, Andriacchi TP, Galante JO. A relationship between gait and clinical changes following high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1188-1194.
17. Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Insall JN. The impact of femoral component rotational alignment on condylar lift-off. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:148-154.
18. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7-13.
19. Sharma A, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Cates HE Jr. High-flexion TKA designs: what are their in vivo contact mechanics? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:117-126.
20. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:31-43.
21. Werner FW, Ayers DC, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ. The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech. 2005;38:349-355.
22. Zihlmann MS, Stacoff A, Romero J, Quervain IK, Stu?ssi E. Biomechanical background and clinical observations of rotational malalignment in TKA: literature review and consequences. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20:661-668.