Recent advances in sustainable multifunctional land and urban management in Europe: A review

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 55, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 833-854

  Scholz, Miklas ^a   Hedmark, Åsa ^a   Hartley, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

environment; integration; planning; policy; research consortia; stakeholder involvement

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HOLISTIC APPROACH; LAND MANAGEMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGIONAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

EUROPE;

EID: 84865053358     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2011.628828     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Ackrill, R., Kay, A. and Morgan, W. 2008. The Common Agricultural Policy and its reform: the problem of reconciling budget and trade concerns. Canadian journal of agricultural economics, 56(4): 393-411.
2. Bella, K. P. and Irwin, E. G. 2005. Spatially explicit micro-level modelling of land use change at the rural-urban interface. Agricultural economics, 27(3): 217-232.
3. BRIDGE. 2010. Official project web site of Sustainable Urban Planning Decision Support Accounting for Urban Metabolism (BRIDGE) [online] Available from: http://www.bridge-project.eu.gr [Accessed 8 March 2011]
4. Camagni, R., Gibelli, M. C. and Rigamonti, P. 2002. Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion. Ecological economics, 40(2): 199-216.
5. Couch, C. 2005. Decline and sprawl: an evolving type of urban development-observed in Liverpool and Leipzig. European planning studies, 13(1): 117-136.
6. Daily, G. C. and Matson, P. A. 2008. Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation. Proceedings of the natural academy of sciences of the USA, 105(28): 9455-9456.
7. de Groot, R. 2006. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape and urban planning, 75(3-4): 175-186.
8. DeSurvey,. 2010. Official project website of Surveillance System for Assessing and Monitoring Desertification (DeSurvey) [online] Available from: www.desurvey.net [Accessed 9 December 2010]
9. Elliot, J. A. 2006. An introduction to sustainable development, Abingdon: Routledge/ Taylor & Francis.
10. Hedelin, B. 2007. Criteria for the assessment of sustainable water management, Berlin: Springer Verlag.
11. Helming, K. 2008. "Ex ante impact assessment of land use changes in European regions-The SENSOR approach". In Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes, Edited by: Helming, K., Perez-Soba, M. and Tabbush, P. 77-105. Berlin: Springer. Part I
12. Heynen, N. C., Kaika, M. and Swyngedouw, E. 2006. In the nature of cities: urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism, Abingdon: Routledge/ Taylor & Francis.
13. Hill, J. 2008. Mediterranean desertification and land degradation: mapping related land use change syndromes based on satellite observations. Global planetary change, 64(3-4): 146-157.
14. Jaeger, J. A.G. 2010. Suitability criteria for measures of urban sprawl. Ecological indicators, 10(2): 397-406.
15. Jansson, Å. and Colding, J. 2007. Tradeoffs between environmental goals and urban development: the case of nitrogen load from the Stockholm County to the Baltic Sea. AMBIO: A journal of the human environment, 36(8): 650-656.
16. KASSA. 2010. Official project web site of Knowledge Assessment and Sharing on Sustainable Agriculture (KASSA) [online] Available from: http://kassa.cirad.fr/ [Accessed 9 December 2010]
17. Lafferty, W. and Hovden, E. 2003. Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environmental politics, 12(3): 1-22.
18. Lahmar, R. 2010. Adoption of conservation agriculture in Europe: lessons of the KASSA project. Land use policy, 27(1): 4-10.
19. LUTR. 2010. Official project web site of Land Use and Transportation Research: Policies for the City of Tomorrow (LUTR) [online] Available from: www.lutr.net [Accessed 9 December 2010]
20. Martinez, B. Procedure for the regional scale mapping of FVC and LAI over land degraded areas in the DeSurvey project. IEEE International, ed. Proceedings of the geoscience and remote sensing symposium. pp.3452-3455. Barcelona.
21. O'Connor, M. C., McKenna, J. and Cooper, J. A.G. 2010. Coastal issues and conflicts in North West Europe: a comparative analysis. Ocean and coastal management, 53(12): 727-737.
22. PLUME. 2005. Project summary of Planning and Urban Mobility in Europe (PLUME) [online] Available from: http://www.lutr.net/amministrazione/uploads/doc/PLUME_ FINALCONFERENCE_REPORT.pdf [Accessed 10 November 2011]
23. PLUREL. 2010. Official project website of Peri-urban Land Use Relationships-Strategies and Sustainability Assessment Tools for Urban-Rural Linkages (PLUREL) [online] Available from: www.plurel.net [Accessed 9 December 2010]
24. RUFUS. 2010. Official project website of Rural Future Networks (RUFUS) [online] Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/projects/431_en.html [Accessed 25 December 2010]
25. SAWA. 2010. Official project web site of Strategic Alliance for Integrated Water Management Actions (SAWA) [online] Available from: www.sawa-project.eu [Accessed 9 December 2010]
26. Scholz, M. 2006. Wetland systems to control urban runoff, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27. Scholz, M. 2010. Wetland systems-storm water management control, Series: Green Energy and Technology. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
28. Scholz, M. and Yang, Q. 2010. Guidance on variables characterising water bodies including sustainable flood retention basins. Landscape and urban planning, 98(3-4): 190-199.
29. Schröter, D. 2005. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science, 310(5752): 1333-1337.
30. SEAMLESS. 2010. Official project web site of System for Environmental and Agricultural Modelling; Linking European Science and Society (SEAMLESS) [online] Available from: www.seamless-ip.org [Accessed 9 December 2010]
31. SENSOR. 2010. Official project web site of Sustainability Impact Assessment: Tools for Environmental Social and Economic Effects of Multifunctional Land Use in European Regions (SENSOR) [online] Available from: www.zalf.de/home_ip-sensor/index.html [Accessed 9 December 2010]
32. Simeonova, V. and van der Valk, A. 2009. The need for a communicative approach to improve environmental policy integration in urban land use planning. Journal of planning literature, 23(3): 241-261.
33. SPICOSA. 2010. Official project website of Science and Policy Integration for Coastal System Assessment (SPICOSA) [online] Available from: www.spicosa.eu/index.htm [Accessed 9 December 2010]
34. SUME. 2010. Official project website of Sustainable Urban Metabolism for Europe (SUME) [online] Available from: www.sume.at [Accessed 9 December 2010]
35. Susta-Info. 2010. Official project website of Global Knowledge for Local Sustainability (Susta-Info) [online] Available from: www.susta-info.net [Accessed 9 December 2010]
36. SWITCH. 2010. Official project website of Managing Water for the City of the Future (SWITCH) [online] Available from: www.switchurbanwater.eu [Accessed 9 December 2010]
37. UN-HABITAT. 2010. Official website of United Nations-HABITAT (UN-HABITAT) [online] Available from: www.unhabitat.org [Accessed 12 January 2011]
38. URBS PANDENS. 2010. Official project web site of Urban Sprawl: European Patterns, Environmental Degradation and Sustainable Development (URBS PANDENS) [online] Available from: http://www.pik-potsdam.de/urbs/ [Accessed 1 March 2011]
39. van Ittersum, M.K. 2008. Integrated assessment of agricultural systems-a component-based framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS). Agricultural systems, 96(1-3): 150-165.
40. van Meijl, H. 2006. The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in Europe. Agriculture, ecosystems and environment, 114(1): 21-38.
41. Verburg, P. H. 2010. Trajectories of land use change in Europe: a model-based exploration of rural futures. Landscape ecology, 25(2): 217-232.
42. Vernier, F. Modelling scenarios of agriculture changes on freshwater uses and water quality at a large watershed scale-the case of the Charente watershed (France). Proceedings of the international environmental modelling and software society (iEMSs) 2010 international congress on environmental modelling and software modelling for environment's. Edited by: Swayne, D. A., Yang, W., Voinov, A. A., Rizzoli, A. and Filatova, T. sake, Ottawa: fifth biennial meeting. [online] Available from: http://www.iemss.org/iemss2010/index.php?n=Main.Proceedings [Accessed 2 March 2011]
43. Vleeshouwers, L. M. and Verhagen, A. 2002. Carbon emission and sequestration by agricultural land use: a model study for Europe. Global change biology, 8(6): 519-530.
44. Wacziarg, R. and Horn Welch, K. 2008. Trade liberalization and growth: new evidence. World Bank economic review, 22(2): 187-231.
45. Wagner, I. and Zalewski, M. 2009. Ecohydrology as a basis for the sustainable city strategy. Reviews of environmental science and biotechnology, 8(3): 209-217.
46. Yang, Q. 2010. Feature selection methods for characterizing and classifying adaptive Sustainable Flood Retention Basins. Water research, 45(3): 993-1004.