Soil type mapping using the generalised linear geostatistical model: A case study in a Dutch cultivated peatland

Geoderma

Volumn 189-190, Issue , 2012, Pages 540-553

  Kempen, Bas ^a   Brus, Dick J ^a   Heuvelink, Gerard B M ^a,b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ISRIC WORLD SOIL INFORMATION   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE PREDICTION; GEOSTATISTICAL MODELS; MODEL RESULTS; MODEL-BASED GEOSTATISTICS; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL; MULTINOMIAL PROBABILITY; PEATLAND; SAMPLE DATA; SOIL MAPS; SOIL TYPES; SPATIAL DEPENDENCE; SPATIAL MODELS; SPATIAL PREDICTION;

FORECASTING; MAPPING; WETLANDS;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AGRICULTURAL SOIL; DIGITAL MAPPING; GEOSTATISTICS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PEATLAND; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL TYPE;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84865050369     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.05.028     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Augustin N.H., Mugglestone M.A., Buckland S. An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. Journal of Applied Ecology 1996, 33:339-347.
2. Behrens T., Förster H., Scholten T., Steinrücken U., Spies E.-D., Goldschmitt M. Digital soil mapping using artificial neural networks. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 2005, 168(1):21-33.
3. Ben-Ahmed K., Bouratbine A., El-Aroui M.-A. Generalized linear spatial models in epidemiology: a case study of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Tunisia. Journal of Applied Statistics 2010, 37(1):159-170.
4. Bierkens M.F.P., Burrough P.A. The indicator approach to categorical soil data. I. Theory. European Journal of Soil Science 1993, 44(2):361-368.
5. Brus D.J., Bogaert P., Heuvelink G.B.M. Bayesian maximum entropy prediction of soil categories using a traditional soil map as soft information. European Journal of Soil Science 2008, 59(2):166-177.
6. Brus D.J., Kempen B., Heuvelink G.B.M. Sampling for validation of digital soil maps. European Journal of Soil Science 2011, 62(3):394-407.
7. Burrough P.A., van Gaans P.F.M., Hootsmans R. Continuous classification in soil survey: spatial correlation, confusion and boundaries. Geoderma 1997, 77(2-4):115-135.
8. Chen Z., Kuo L. A note on the estimation of the multinomial logit model with random effects. The American Statistician 2001, 55(2):89-95.
9. Christensen O.F. Monte Carlo maximum likelihood in model-based geostatistics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2004, 13(3):702-718.
10. Christensen O.F., Ribeiro P. geoRglm: a package for generalized linear spatial models. R-News 2002, 2:26-28. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/doc/rnews.
11. Clement J., Kooistra L. Eerste bosstatistiek digitaal; opbouw van een historisch basisbestand. Technical Report 744, Alterra 2003.
12. D'Or D., Bogaert P. Spatial prediction of categorical variables with the Bayesian Maximum Entropy approach: the Ooypolder case study. European Journal of Soil Science 2004, 55(4):763-775.
13. de Bakker H., Schelling J. A system of soil classification for the Netherlands: the higher levels 1966, Pudoc, Wageningen.
14. de Vries F., Lesschen J.P., van den Akker J.J.H., Petrescu A.M.R., van Huissteden J., van den Wyngaert I. Bodemgerelateerde emissie van broeikasgassen in Drenthe; de huidige situatie. Technical Report 1859, Alterra 2009.
15. de Vries F., Stoffelsen G.H., van der Werff M.M. Validatie bodemkaart van de veengebieden in Noord-Holland. Technical Report 2085, Alterra 2010.
16. Debella-Gilo M., Etzelmüller B. Spatial prediction of soil classes using digital terrain analysis and multinomial logistic regression modeling integrated in GIS: examples from Vestfold County, Norway. Catena 2009, 77(1):8-18.
17. Diggle P.J., Ribeiro P.J. Model-based geostatistics. Springer Series in Statistics 2007, Springer, New York.
18. Diggle P.J., Tawn J.A., Moyeed R.A. Model-based geostatistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics 1998, 47(3):299-325.
19. Diggle P., Moyeed R., Rowlingson B., Thomson M. Childhood malaria in the Gambia: a case-study in model-based geostatistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics 2002, 51(4):493-506.
20. Diggle P., Ribeiro P., Christensen O.F. An introduction to model-based geostatistics. Spatial Statistics and Computational methods, volume 173 of Lecture Notes in Statistics 2003, Springer, New York. J. Møller (Ed.).
21. Dormann C. Assessing the validity of autologistic regression. Ecological Modelling 2007, 207(2-4):234-242.
22. Goovaerts P. Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science. Geoderma 2001, 103(1-2):3-26.
23. Hartman L.W. Bayesian modelling of spatial data using Markov random fields, with application to elemental composition of forest soil. Mathematical Geology 2006, 38(2):113-133.
24. Hartzel J., Agresti A., Caffo B. Multinomial logit random effects models. Statistical Modelling 2001, 1(2):81-102.
25. Hazeu G.W. Landelijk Grondgebruiksbestand Nederland (LGN5). Vervaardiging, nauwkeurigheid en gebruik. Technical Report 1213, Alterra 2005.
26. Hedeker D. A mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression model. Statistics in Medicine 2003, 22(9):1433-1446.
27. Hengl T., Toomanian N., Reuter H.I., Malakouti M.J. Methods to interpolate soil categorical variables from profile observations: lessons from Iran. Geoderma 2007, 140(4):417-427.
28. Heuvelink G.B.M. Soil spatial prediction with Markov random fields. Pedometron 2007, 23:16-20.
29. Hoeting J.A., Leecaster M., Bowden D. An improved model for spatially correlated binary responses. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 2000, 5(1):102-114.
30. Hosmer D., Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression (2nd Edition) 2000, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
31. Hou Q., Young L.J., Brandle J.R., Schoeneberger M.M. A spatial model approach for assessing windbreak growth and carbon stocks. Journal of Environmental Quality 2011, 40(3):842-852.
32. Kasetkasem T., Arora M.K., Varshney P.K. Super-resolution land cover mapping using a Markov random field based approach. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 96(3-4):302-314.
33. Kempen B., Brus D.J., Heuvelink G.B.M., Stoorvogel J.J. Updating the 1:50,000 Dutch soil map using legacy soil data: a multinomial logistic regression approach. Geoderma 2009, 151(3-4):311-326.
34. Knol W., Kramer H., Dorland G., Gijsbertse H. Historisch Grondgebruik Nederland: tijdreeksen grondgebruik Noord-Holland van 1950 tot 1980. Technical Report 751, Alterra 2003.
35. Knol W., Kramer H., Gijsbertse H. Historisch Grondgebruik Nederland: een landelijke reconstructie van het grondgebruik rond 1900. Technical Report 573, Alterra 2004.
36. Lark R., Cullis B. Model-based analysis using REML for inference from systematically sampled data on soil. European Journal of Soil Science 2004, 55(4):799-813.
37. Lark R.M., Webster R. Geostatistical mapping of geomorphic variables in the presence of trend. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2006, 31(7):862-874.
38. Lark R.M., Cullis B.R., Welham S.J. On spatial prediction of soil properties in the presence of a spatial trend: the empirical best linear unbiased predictor E-BLUP with REML. European Journal of Soil Science 2006, 57(6):787-799.
39. Lemercier B., Lacoste M., Loum M., Walter C. Extrapolation at regional scale of local soil knowledge using boosted classification trees: a two-step approach. Geoderma 2012, 171-172:75-84.
40. McCullagh P., Nelder J. Generalized Linear Models 1989, Chapman & Hall, London.
41. Minasny B., McBratney A.B. Incorporating taxonomic distance into spatial prediction and digital mapping of soil classes. Geoderma 2007, 142(3-4):285-293.
42. Minasny B., Vrugt J.A., McBratney A.B. Confronting uncertainty in model-based geostatistics using Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation. Geoderma 2011, 163(3-4):150-162.
43. Mosegaard K., Sambridge M. Monte Carlo analysis of inverse problems. Inverse Problems 2002, 18:29-54.
44. Nelson M.A., Odeh I.O.A. Digital soil class mapping using legacy soil profile data: a comparison of a genetic algorithm and classification tree approach. Australian Journal of Soil Research 2009, 47:632-649.
45. Nelson, M., Bishop, T.F.A., Odeh, I.O.A., Weber, N., submitted for publication. A generalized linear spatial model for digital soil class mapping. European Journal of Soil Science.
46. Norberg T., Rosén L., Baran A., Baran S. On modelling discrete geological structures as Markov random fields. Mathematical Geology 2002, 34(1):63-77.
47. Oberthür T., Goovaerts P., Dobermann A. Mapping soil texture classes using field texturing, particle size distribution and local knowledge by both conventional and geostatistical methods. European Journal of Soil Science 1999, 50(3):457-479.
48. Odgers N.P., McBratney A.B., Minasny B. Bottom-up digital soil mapping. I. Soil layer classes. Geoderma 2011, 163(1-2):38-44.
49. Palmgren J. The Fisher information matrix for log linear models arguing conditionally on observed explanatory variable. Biometrika 1981, 68(2):563-566.
50. Papritz A. Why indicator kriging should be abandoned. Pedometron 2009, 26:4-7.
51. Spek, T., 2004. Het Drentse esdorpenlandschap: een historisch-geografische studie. Phd thesis, Wageningen University.
52. Bodemkaart van Nederland, schaal 1:50.000; Algemene begrippen en indelingen (4e editie) 1991, Staring Centrum, Wageningen. G.G.L. Steur, W. Heijink (Eds.).
53. Stum A.K., Boettinger J.L., White M.A., Ramsey R.D. Random forests applied as a soil spatial predictive model in arid Utah. Digital Soil Mapping-Bridging Research, Environmental Application, and Operation, number 2 in Progress in Soil Science, pages 2010, 179-189. Springer, New York. J. Boettinger, D. Howell, A. Moore, A. Hartemink, S. Kienast-Brown (Eds.).
54. ten Cate J.A.M., van Holst A., Kleijer H., Stolp J. Handleiding bodemgeografisch onderzoek: richtlijnen en voorschriften. Technical Report 19, DLO-Staring Centrum 1995.
55. van Kekem A.J., Hoogland T., van der Horst J.B.F. Uitspoelingsgevoelige gronden op de kaart; werkwijze en resultaten. Technical Report 1080, Alterra 2005.
56. Viscarra Rossel R.A., Chen C. Digitally mapping the information content of visible-near infrared spectra of surficial Australian soils. Remote Sensing of Environment 2011, 115(6):1443-1455.
57. Webster R., McBratney A.B. On the Akaike Information Criterion for choosing models for variograms of soil properties. Journal of Soil Science 1989, 40(3):493-496.
58. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Use R 2009, Springer, New York.
59. Yang L., Jiao Y., Fahmy S., Zhu A.-X., Hann S., Burt J.E., Qi F. Updating conventional soil maps through digital soil mapping. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2011, 75(3):1044-1053.