Retail competition in electricity supply-Survey results in North Carolina

Energy Policy

Volumn 48, Issue , 2012, Pages 315-321

  McDaniel, Tanga M ^a   Groothuis, Peter A ^a  

^a APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electricity supply; Retail competition; Switching

Indexed keywords

CALIFORNIA; DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES; ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY DEREGULATION; ELECTRICITY MARKET; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; FOLLOWING PROBLEM; NORTH CAROLINA; RATE REDUCTION; RETAIL COMPETITION; TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES;

DEREGULATION; ELECTRIC INDUSTRY; SURVEYS; SWITCHING;

SALES;

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY; COMPETITION (ECONOMICS); ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY MARKET; INNOVATION; RETAILING;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84865036288     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.028     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Blumstein C., Friedman L., Green R. The history of electricity restructuring in California. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 2002, 2(1/2):9-38.
2. Cramton, P., 2003. Electricity market design: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
3. Defeuilley C. Retail competition in electricity markets. Energy Policy 2009, 37:377-386.
4. Defeuilley C. Retail competition in electricity markets-expectations and outcomes: a reply. Energy Policy 2009, 37:764-765.
5. Faruqui A., Sergici S. Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments. Journal of Regulatory Economics 2010, 38:193-225.
6. Greene W. Econometric Analysis 2002, Princeton Hall. fifth ed.
7. Joskow, P., 2000. Why do we need electricity retailers? Or can you get cheaper wholesale? Working Paper, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, MIT.
8. Joskow P, Tirole.J. Retail Electricity Competition. The Rand Journal of Economics 2006, 37(4):799-815.
9. Kang L., Zarnikau J. Did the expiration of retail price caps affect prices in the restructured Texas electricity market?. Energy Policy 2009, 1713-1717.
10. Kwoka J. Restructuring the U.S. electric power sector: a review of recent studies. Review of Industrial Organization 2008, 32:165-196.
11. Littlechild S. Municipal aggregation and retail competition in the Ohio energy sector. Journal of Regulatory Economics 2008, 34:164-194.
12. Littlechild S. Retail competition in electricity markets-expectations, outcomes and economics. Energy Policy 2009, 37:759-763.
13. Nakajima T., Hamori S. Change in consumer sensitivity to electricity prices in response to retail deregulation: a panel empirical analysis of the residential demand for electricity in the United States. Energy Policy 2010, 38. 2479-2476.
14. Sidak J., Spulber D. Deregulatory Takings and the Regulatory Contract 1998, Cambridge University Press.
15. Swadley A., Yücel M. Did residential electricity rates fall after retail competition? A dynamic panel analysis. Energy Policy 2011, 39:7702-7711.
16. U.S.A Department of Energy, Energy Information Association. http://www.eia.doe.gov/.
17. Whitehead J., Groothuis P., Blomquist G. Testing for non-response and sample selection bias in contingent valuation: analysis of a combination phone/mail survey. Economics Letters 1993, 41:215-220.
18. Zarnikau J., Whitworth D. Has electric utility restructuring led to lower electricity prices for residential customers in Texas?. Energy Policy 2006, 34:2191-2200.