Performance management in governance networks-critical concepts and practices: Editor's introduction

Public Performance and Management Review

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 515-519

  Koliba, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865030600     PISSN: 15309576     EISSN: 15579271     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576340404     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. De Bruijn, H. (2001). Managing performance in the public sector. London: Routledge.
2. Frederickson, D., & Frederickson, H.G. (2006). Measuring the performance of the hollow state. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
3. Frederickson, H.G. (1999). The repositioning of American public administration. Political Science and Politics, 32(4), 701-711.
4. Haynes, P. (2003). Managing complexity in the public services. London: Open University Press.
5. Koliba, C., Meek, J., & Zia, A. (2010). Governance networks in public administration and public policy. New York: Taylor & Francis.
6. Metzenbaum, S. (2010). M 10-24 Memorandum for Executive Departments and Agencies. Office of Management and Budget. www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/ files/omb/assets/ memoranda-2010/m10-24.pdf, accessed October 11, 2010.
7. Milward, H., & Provan, K. (1998). Principles for controlling agents: The political economy of network structure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 203-222.
8. Poister, T.H. (2003). Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Radin, B. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity and democratic values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
10. Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2008). Theories of democratic network governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Yang, K. (2007). Responsiveness in network governance: Revisiting a fundamental concept. Public Performance Management Review, 31(2), 131-143.