Measuring performance for collaborative public management using network analysis methods and tools

Public Performance and Management Review

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 549-579

  Kapucu, Naim ^a   Demiroz, Fatih ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

collaborations; collaborative public management; emergency management; emergency management networks; network analysis; network performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865027075     PISSN: 15309576     EISSN: 15579271     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576340406     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Agranoff, R. (2005). Managing collaborative performance: Changing the boundaries of the state. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(1), 18-45.
2. Analytic Technologies. 2008. Centrality. www.analytictech.com/networks/ centrali.htm, accessed February 21, 2008.
3. Bingham, L.B. (2008). Legal frameworks for governance and public management. In L.B. Bingham and R. O'Leary (Eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 247-269). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
4. Bingham, L.B., O'Leary, R., & Carlson, C. (2008). Frame shifting lateral thinking for collaborative public management. In L.B. Bingham and R. O'Leary (Eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 3-16). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
5. Bonacich, P. (2007). Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks, 29(4), 555-564.
6. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Linton C. Freeman. (2007). UC INET 6.0 VERSION for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
7. Cohen, S., Eimicke, W., & Horan, J. (2002). Catastrophe and the public service: A case study of the governmental response to destruction of World Trade Center. Public Administration Review, 62(S1), 24-32.
8. Comfort, L.K., & Haase, T.W. (2006). Communication, coherence, and collective action: The impact of Hurricane Katrina on communications infrastructure. Public Works Management & Policy, 10(3), 328-343.
9. Comfort, L.K., & Kapucu, N. (2006). Interorganizational coordination in extreme events: The World Trade Center attacks, September 11, 2001. Natural Hazards 39(2): 309-327.
10. Cross, R., & Thomas, R.J. (2009). Driving results through social networks: How top organizations leverage networks for performance and growth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). (2004). National response plan (NRP). Washington, DC.
12. Dowding, K. (1995). Model or metaphor? A critical review of the policy network approach. Political Studies, 43(1), 136-158.
13. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (1992). Federal response plan. Washington, DC.
14. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (1993). FEMA's disaster management program: A performance audit after Hurricane Andrew. H-01-93. Washington, DC.
15. General Accounting Office (GAO). (1993). Disaster management: Improving the nation's response to catastrophic disasters. Washington, DC: GPO.
16. Hanneman, R.A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California, available at http://faculty.ucr. edu/~hanneman/.
17. Kapucu, N. (2006a). Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multi-agency coordination. American Review of Public Administration, 36(2), 207-225.
18. Kapucu, N. (2006b). Examining the National Response Plan in response to a catastrophic disaster: Hurricane Katrina in 2005. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 24(2), 271-299.
19. Kapucu, N. (2008). Collaborative emergency management: Better community organizing, better public preparedness and response. Disasters, 32(2), 239-262.
20. Kapucu, N., & Van Wart, M. (2006). The evolving role of the public sector in managing catastrophic disasters: Lessons learned. Administration & Society, 38(3), 279-308.
21. Kapucu, N., Augustin, M.A., & Garayev, V. (2009). Interstate partnerships in emergency management: Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC) in response to catastrophic disasters. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 297-313.
22. Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J.H. (1982). Network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23. Koliba, C., Meek, J.C., & Zia, A. (2010). Governance networks in public administration and public policy. New York: CRC Press.
24. Mandell, M.P., & Keast, R. (2007). Evaluating network arrangements. Public Performance and Management Review, 30(4), 574-597.
25. McGuire, M., & Agranoff, R. (2007). Answering the big questions, asking the bigger questions: Expanding the public network management empirical research agenda. Paper presented at 9th Public Management Research Conference, Tucson.
26. Monge, P.R., & Contractor, N.S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA).(1993). Coping with catastrophe: Building an emergency management system to meet people's need in natural and manmade disasters. Washington, DC.
28. O'Toole, L.J. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1): 45-52.
29. Provan, K.G., & Milward, H.B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414-423.
30. Provan, K.G., & Sebastian, J.G. (1998). Networks within networks: Service link overlap, organizational cliques, and network effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 453-463.
31. Provan, K.G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), 479-516.
32. Provan, K.G., Veazie, M.A., Staten, L.K., & Teufel-Shone, N.I. (2005). The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnerships. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 603-613.
33. Rethemeyer R.K., &. Hatmaker, D.M. (2008). Network management reconsidered: An inquiry into management of network structures in public sector service provision. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 617-646.
34. Rubin, C.B. (Ed.). (2007). Emergency management: The American experience 1900-2005. Fairfax, VA: PERI.
35. Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Senge, P., Smith, B., Kruschwitz, N., Laur, J., & Schley, S. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. New York: Doubleday.
37. Siegel, G.B., Clayton, R., & Kovoor, S. (1990). Modeling interorganizational effectiveness. Public Productivity & Management Review, 13(3), 215-222.
38. Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (1998). Organizing and evaluating interfirm networks: A structurationist perspective on network process and effectiveness. Organization Science, 9(3): 265-284.
39. Thompson, M.A., Perry, J.L., & Miller, T.K. (2007). Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 23-56.
40. Townsend, F.F. (2006). The federal response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons learned. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. www.whitehouse.com, accessed October 12, 2006.
41. U.S. House of Representatives. (2006). Select bipartisan committee to investigate the preparation for and response to Katrina: A failure of initiative. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. http://katrina.house. gov/full-katrina-report.htm, accessed October 9, 2006.
42. U.S. Senate Committee of Homeland Security and Government Affairs. (2006). Hurricane Katrina: A nation still unprepared. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. http:// hsgac.senate.gov/-files/Katrina/ExecSum.pdf, accessed October 29, 2006.
43. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Waugh, W.L., Jr., & Sylves, R.T. (2002). Organizing the war on terrorism. Public Administration Review, 62(S1), 145-154.