Recommendations for a screening series for allergic contact eyelid dermatitis

Dermatitis

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 17-21

  Herro, Elise M ^a,b   Elsaie, Mohammed L ^c,d   Nijhawan, Rajiv I ^e   Jacob, Sharon E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Egypt)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4 HYDROXYBENZOIC ACID ESTER; ALLERGEN; BACITRACIN; BALSAM PERU; BENZYL ALCOHOL; BRONOPOL; CINNAMYL ALCOHOL; COBALT; DIAZOLIDINYL UREA; DICHROMATE POTASSIUM; DODECYL GALLATE; FORMALDEHYDE; HYDROXYCITRONELLAL; NICKEL;

ADULT; AGED; ALLERGIC CONTACT EYELID DERMATITIS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PATCH TEST; PERU; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN TEST; UNIVERSITY;

ADULT; AGED; ALLERGENS; BALSAMS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; EYELID DISEASES; FEMALE; FORMALDEHYDE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NICKEL; PATCH TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865024148     PISSN: 17103568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DER.0b013e31823d191f     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Skuta G, Cantor L. Basic and Clinical Science Course: Orbit, Eyelids, and Lacrimal System. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2010.
2. Veien NK. General aspects of contact dermatitis. In: Frosch PJ, Mennet T, Lepoittevin JP, eds. Contact Dermatitis. New York, NY: Springer; 2006:201-247.
3. Wolf R, Perluke H. Failure of routine patch tests results to detect eyelid dermatitis. Cutis 1992;49(2):133-134.
4. Hill AM, Belsito DV. Systemic contact dermatitis of the eyelids caused by formaldehyde derived from aspartame? Contact Dermatitis 2003;49(5): 258-259.
5. Rietschel RL, Warshaw EM, Sasseville D, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Common contact allergens associated with eyelid dermatitis: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2003-2004 study period. Dermatitis 2007;18(2):78-81.
6. Shah M, Lewis FM, Gawkrodger DJ. Facial dermatitis and eyelid dermatitis: a comparison of patch test and final diagnoses. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34(2):140-141.
7. Beltrani VS, Bernstein L, Cohen DE, et al. Contact dermatitis: a practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2006;97:s1-s38.
8. Peralejo B, Beltrani V, Bielory L. Dermatologic and allergic conditions of the eyelid. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2008;28(1):137-168.
9. Herbst RA, Uter W, Pirkwer C, et al. Allergic and non allergic periorbital dermatitis: patch test results of the information network of the departments of dermatology during a 5 year period. Contact Dermatitis 2004; 51:13-19.
10. Seitz CS, Bröcker EB, Trautmann A. Eyelid dermatitis due to sodium metabisulfite. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55(4):249-250.
11. Teixeira M, de Wachter L, Ronsyn E, et al. Contact allergy to paraphenylenediamine in a permanent eyelash dye. Contact Dermatitis 2006; 55(2):92-94.
12. -Dejobert Y, Delaporte E, Piette F, et al. Eyelid dermatitis with positive patch test to coconut diethanolamide. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 52(3):173.
13. Vaswani SK, Collins DD, Pass CJ. Severe allergic contact eyelid dermatitis caused by swimming goggles. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2003;90(6): 672-673.
14. Jacob SE, Stechschulte S. Formaldehyde, aspartame and migraines - a possible connection. Dermatitis 2008;19(3):E10-E11.
15. Amin KA, Belsito DV. The aetiology of eyelid dermatitis: a 10-year retrospective analysis. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55(5):280-285.
16. Jacob SE, Burk CJ, Connelly EA. Patch testing: another steroid-spearing agent to consider in children. Pediatr Dermatol 2008;25(1):81-87.
17. Zemba C, Romaguera C, Vilaplana J. Allergic contact dermatitis from nickel in an eye pencil. Contact Dermatitis 1992;27:116.
18. Brandrup F. Nickel eyelid dermatitis from an eyelash curler. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:77.
19. van Ketel WG, Bruynzeel DP. Allergic contact dermatitis from nickel in eyeshadow. Contact Dermatitis 1989;21(5):355.
20. Goh CL, Ng SK, Kwok SF. Allergic contact dermatitis from nickel in eyeshadow. Contact Dermatitis 1989;20(5):380-381.
21. Rietschel R, Fowler JF. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: BC Decker Inc; 2008:176, 417-418, 714.
22. Cooper S, Shaw S. Eyelid dermatitis: an evaluation of 232 patch test patients over 5 years. Contact Dermatitis 2000;42:291-293.
23. Malvestio A, Bovenzi M, Hoteit M, et al. p-Phenylenediamine sensitization and occupation. Contact Dermatitis 2011;64(1):37-42.
24. Li LF. A study of the sensitization rate to cocamidopropyl betaine in patients patch tested in a university hospital of Beijing. Contact Dermatitis 2008;58(1):24-27.
25. Hillen U, Grabbe S, Utter W. Patch test results in patients with scalp dermatitis: analysis of data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology. Contact Dermatitis 2007;56(2):87-93.
26. Militello G. Contact and primary irritant dermatitis of the nail unit diagnosis and treatment. Dermatol Ther 2007;20(1):47-53.
27. Hausen BM, Milbrodt M, Koenig WA. The allergens of nail polish. (I). Allergenic constituents of common nail polish and toluenesulfonamideformaldehyde resin (TS-FR). Contact Dermatitis 1995;33(3):157-164.
28. Giorgini S, Bruci C, Francalanci S, et al. Prevention of allergic contact dermatitis from nail varnishes and hardeners. Contact Dermatitis 1994;31(5): 325-326.
29. Betts CJ, Dearman RJ, Heylings JR, et al. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55(3): 140-147.
30. Nedorost S, Wagman A. Positive patch-test reactions to gold: patients' perception of relevance and the role of titanium dioxide in cosmetics. Dermatitis 2005;16(2):67-70.
31. Ehlrlich A, Belsito DV. Allergic contact dermatitis to gold. Cutis 2000;65: 323-326.
32. Jacob SE, Brod B, Crawford GH. Clinically relevant patch test reactions in children - a United States based study. Pediatr Dermatol 2008;25(5): 520-527.
33. Valsecchi R, Imberti G, Martino D, et al. Eyelid dermatitis: an evaluation of 150 patients. Contact Dermatitis 1992;27:143-147.
34. Garcia-Melagres ML, de la Cuadra J, Martin B, et al. Sensitization to gallates: review of 46 cases. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2007;98(10):688-693.
35. Pinola A, Estlander T, Jolanki R, et al. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to coconut diethanolamide (cocamide DEA). Contact Dermatitis 1993;29(5):262-265.
36. Fowler JF Jr. Allergy to cocamide DEA. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1998;9(1):40-41.