Seismic zonation and default suite of ground-motion records for time-history analysis in the North Island of New Zealand

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 667-688

  Oyarzo Vera, Claudio A ^a,c   McVerry, Graeme H ^b   Ingham, Jason M ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE LA SANTÍSIMA CONCEPCIÓN   (Chile)

^b GNS SCIENCE   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAZARDS;

FUNDAMENTAL PERIOD; HAZARD SCENARIOS; RETURN PERIODS; SEISMIC HAZARDS; SEISMIC ZONATION; SELECTION OF GROUND MOTION RECORDS; SITE SPECIFIC STUDY; TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS;

SEISMOLOGY;

BUILDING; GROUND MOTION; RETURN PERIOD; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC ZONE; SEISMOLOGY;

NEW ZEALAND; NORTH ISLAND;

EID: 84865001589     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.4000016     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2007. Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, ASCE/SEI 41-06, Reston, VA.
2. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1996. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, ATC-40, Redwood City, CA.
3. Atkinson, G. M., and Boore, D. M., 2003. Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction-zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93, 1703-1729. (Pubitemid 37332724)
4. Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN), 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance -Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, 2004 Edition, Brussels, Belgium.
5. Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation System (COSMOS), 1999.
6. COSMOS Virtual Data Center, http://db.cosmos-eq.org/scripts/default.plx (accessed 1 December 2010).
7. Cousins, W. J., Zhao, J. X., and Perrin, N. D., 1999. A model for the attenuation of peak ground acceleration in New Zealand earthquakes based on seismograph and accelerograph data, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 32, 193-220. (Pubitemid 30530148)
8. Dhakal, R., Singh, S., and Mander, J., 2007. Effectiveness of earthquake selection and scaling procedure method in New Zealand, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 40, 160-171. (Pubitemid 47524267)
9. Earthquake Commission New Zealand and GNS Science (EQC-GNS), 2004. GeoNet Strong Motion Data, ftp://ftp.geonet.org.nz/strong/processed (accessed 1 December 2010).
10. Iervolino, I., Maddaloni, G., and Cosenza, E., 2008. Eurocode 8 compliant real record sets for seismic analysis of structures, Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12, 54-90.
11. Iervolino, I., Maddaloni, G., and Cosenza, E., 2009. A note on selection of time-histories for seismic analysis of bridges in Eurocode 8, Journal of Earthquake Engineering 13, 1125-1152.
12. Iervolino, I., Galasso, C., and Cosenza, E, 2010 REXEL: Computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 8, 339-362.
13. Kelly, T. E., 2004. 2003 State-of-the-art report on seismic analysis, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 37, 23-34.
14. Kyoshin Network (K-NET), 2010. Japan Strong-Motion Data Center, http://www.k-net.bosai.go.jp/k-net (accessed 21 December 2010).
15. McVerry, G. H., Zhao, J. X., Abrahamson, N. A., and Somerville, P. G., 2006. New Zealand acceleration response spectrum attenuation relations for crustal and subduction zone earthquakes, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 39, 1-58. (Pubitemid 43972884)
16. Oyarzo-Vera, C., and Chouw, N., 2008. Comparison of record scaling methods proposed by standards currently applied in different countries, in Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 12-17 October 2008. Beijing, China.
17. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), 2005. PEER NGA Database, http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga/index.html (accessed 21 December 2010).
18. Spudich, P., Joyner, W., Lindh, A., Boore, D., Margaris, B., and Fletcher, J., 1999. SEA99: A revised ground-motion prediction relation for use in extensional tectonic regimes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89, 1156-1170. (Pubitemid 30137222)
19. Standards New Zealand (SNZ), 2004a. NZS 1170.5:2004 -Structural design actions, Earthquake Actions, 2004 Edition, Wellington, New Zealand.
20. Standards New Zealand (SNZ), 2004b. NZS 1170.5:2004 -Structural design action, Earthquake actions -Commentary, 2004 Edition, Wellington, New Zealand.
21. Stirling, M., McVerry, G., and Berryman, K., 2002. A new seismic hazard model for New Zealand, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 92, 1878-1903.
22. Stirling, M., Gerstenberger, M., Lichtfield, N., McVerry, G., Smith, W., Pettinga, J., and Barnes, P., 2008. Seismic hazard of the Canterbury Region, New Zealand: New earthquake source model and methodology, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 41, 51-67.
23. Stirling, M., McVerry, G., Gerstenberger, M., Litchfield, N., Van Dissen, R., Berryman, K., Barnes, P., Beavan, J., Bradley, B., Clark, K., Jacobs, K., Lamarche, G., Langridge, R., Nicol, A., Nodder, S., Pettinga, J., Reyners, M., Rhoades, D., Smith, W., Villamor, P., and Wallace, L., 2012. National seismic hazard model for New Zealand: 2010 update, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, in press.
24. Wilson, C., Houghton, B., McWilliams, M., Lanphere, M., Weaver, S., and Briggs, R., 1995. Volcanic and structural evolution of Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand: a review., Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 68, 1-28. (Pubitemid 26459142)