The policy implications of energy-efficiency cost curves

Energy Journal

Volumn 32, Issue SPEC. ISSUE 1, 2011, Pages 7-21

  Huntington, Hillard G ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864978717     PISSN: 01956574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-2     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Axsen, J., D. Mountain, and M. Jaccard (2009). "Combining Stated and Revealed Choice Research to Simulate Preference Dynamics: The Case of Hybrid-Electric Vehicles." Resource and Energy Economics, 31(3): 221-238.
2. Clarke, Leon, Christoph Böhringer and Tom F. Rutherford, editors (2009). International, U.S. and E.U. Climate Change Control Scenarios: Results from EMF 22, Energy Economics, Volume 31, Supplement 2, December.
3. Energy Modeling Forum (2011). Energy Efficiency and Climate Change Mitigation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
4. Energy Modeling Forum (1996). Markets for Energy Efficiency, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
5. Gillingham, Kenneth, Richard G. Newell, and Karen Palmer (2009). "Energy Efficiency Economics and Policy," Annual Review of Resource Economics 1: 14.1-14.23.
6. Gillingham, Kenneth, Richard G. Newell, and Karen Palmer (2006). "Energy Efficiency Policies: A Retrospective Examination," Annual Review Environmental Resources 31: 161-92.
7. Greening, L.A., D.L. Greene and C. Difiglio (2000). "Energy efficiency and consumption-the rebound effect-a survey." Energy Policy 28(6-7): 389-401. (Pubitemid 30325355)
8. Hoffman, Kenneth C. and Dale W. Jorgenson (1977). "Economic and Technological Models for Evaluation of Energy Policy," Bell Journal of Economics, 8(2): 444-466
9. Autumn. Horne, M., M. Jaccard, and K. Tiedemann (2005). "Improving Behavioral Realism in Hybrid Energy-Economy Models Using Discrete Choice Studies of Personal Transportation Decisions," Energy Economics, 27: 59-77.
10. Hourcade, Jean-Charles, Mark Jaccard, Chris Bataille, and Frederic Ghersi, editors (2006). "Hybrid Modeling of Energy-Environment Policies: Reconciling Bottom-Up and Top-Down," The Energy Journal, special issue.
11. Huntington, Hillard, Lee Schipper, Alan H. Sanstad, editors (1994). Markets for Energy Efficiency. Energy Policy, 22(10), October.
12. Interlaboratory Working Group (1997). Scenarios of U.S. Carbon Reductions: Potential Impacts of Energy-Efficient and Low-Carbon Technologies by 2010 and Beyond. Oak Ridge, TN and Berkeley, CA: Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. ORNL-444 and LBNL-40533. September.
13. McKinsey & Company (2007). "Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: How Much at What Cost?" http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/ ccsi/greenhousegas.asp.
14. McKinsey & Company (2009). "Unlocking Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Economy," http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/ electricpowernaturalgas/us-energy-efficiency.
15. Nadel, Stephen and Howard Geller (1996). "Utility DSM: What Have We Learned? Where Are We Going?" Energy Policy 24(4): 289-302.
16. Sathaye, Jayant and Amol Phadke (2010). "Energy Efficiency Cost Curves: Empirical Insights for Energy-Climate Modeling," in Modeling the Economics of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Summary of a Workshop, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
17. Savage, Sam L. (2009). The Flaw of Averages: WhyWe Underestimate Risk in the Face of Uncertainty, Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2009. 412 pp.
18. Sorrell, Steve, John Dimitropoulos, and Matt Sommerville (2009). "Empirical Estimates of the Direct Rebound Effect: A Review," Energy Policy, 37(4): 1356-1371.
19. Stavins, Robert, Judson Jaffe, and Todd Schatzki (2007). "Too Good to Be True? An Examination of Three Economic Assessments of California Climate Change Policy," NBERWorking Papers 13587, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.