Fragility of brushite stones in shock wave lithotripsy: Absence of correlation with computerized tomography visible structure

Journal of Urology

Volumn 188, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 996-1001

  Williams Jr , James C ^a   Hameed, Tariq ^a   Jackson, Molly E ^a   Aftab, Syed ^a   Gambaro, Alessia ^a   Pishchalnikov, Yuri A ^a   Lingeman, James E ^a   McAteer, James A ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

brushite; calculi; high energy shock waves; kidney; spiral computed; tomography

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM PHOSPHATE DIBASIC;

ARTICLE; DENSITY; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; IN VITRO STUDY; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STONE FORMATION; VOLUMETRY; WEIGHT;

CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; KIDNEY CALCULI; LITHOTRIPSY; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 84864956205     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.097     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. A.E. Krambeck, S.E. Handa, A.P. Evan Profile of the brushite stone former J Urol 184 2010 1367
2. J.C. Williams Jr, K.C. Saw, R.F. Paterson Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy Urology 61 2003 1092
3. L.W. Klee, C.G. Brito, J.E. Lingeman The clinical implications of brushite calculi J Urol 145 1991 715
4. C.Y.C. Pak, J.R. Poindexter, R.D. Peterson Biochemical and physicochemical presentations of patients with brushite stones J Urol 171 2004 1046
5. A.P. Evan, J.E. Lingeman, F.L. Coe Crystal-associated nephropathy in patients with brushite nephrolithiasis Kidney Int 67 2005 576
6. M. Daudon, H. Bouzidi, D. Bazin Composition and morphology of phosphate stones and their relation with etiology Urol Res 38 2010 459
7. N. Mandel, I. Mandel, K. Fryjoff Conversion of calcium oxalate to calcium phosphate with recurrent stone episodes J Urol 169 2003 2026
8. S.C. Kim, E.K. Burns, J.E. Lingeman Cystine calculi: correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy Urol Res 35 2007 319
9. C.A. Zarse, T.A. Hameed, M.E. Jackson CT visible internal stone structure - but not Hounsfield unit value - of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro Urol Res 35 2007 201
10. R. Pramanik, J.R. Asplin, M.E. Jackson Protein content of human apatite and brushite kidney stones: significant correlation with morphologic measures Urol Res 36 2008 251
11. R. Grosjean, B. Sauer, R.M. Guerra Characterization of human renal stones with MDCT: advantage of dual energy and limitations due to respiratory motion AJR Am J Roentgenol 190 2008 720
12. S.R. Patel, G. Haleblian, A. Zabbo Hounsfield units on computed tomography predict calcium stone subtype composition Urol Int 83 2009 175
13. M. Daudon, M.F. Protat, R.J. Reveillaud Analyse des calculs par spectrophotométrie infrarouge Advantages et limites de la méthode Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 36 1978 475
14. J.L. Fleiss Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters Psychol Bull 76 1971 378
15. H.L. Kundel, M. Polansky Measurement of observer agreement Radiology 228 2003 303
16. M. Daudon, R. Donsimoni, C. Hennequin Sex and age-related composition of 10617 calculi analyzed by infrared-spectroscopy Urol Res 23 1995 319
17. J.C. Williams Jr, C.A. Zarse, M.E. Jackson Using helical CT to predict stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) A.P. Evan, J.E. Lingeman, J.C. Williams Jr. Renal Stone Disease: Proceedings of the First International Urolithiasis Research Symposium 2007 American Institute of Physics Melville, New York 326 339
18. M. Qu, J.C. Ramirez-Giraldo, S. Leng Dual-energy dual-source CT with additional spectral filtration can improve the differentiation of non-uric acid renal stones: an ex vivo phantom study AJR Am J Roentgenol 196 2011 1279
19. J.H. Parks, E.M. Worcester, F.L. Coe Clinical implications of abundant calcium phosphate in routinely analyzed kidney stones Kidney Int 66 2004 777
20. A.E. Krambeck, S.E. Handa, A.P. Evan Brushite stone disease as a consequence of lithotripsy? Urol Res 38 2010 293