Content and construct validation of a robotic surgery curriculum using an electromagnetic instrument tracker

Journal of Urology

Volumn 188, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 919-923

  Tausch, Timothy J ^a   Kowalewski, Timothy M ^b   White, Lee W ^b   McDonough, Patrick S ^a   Brand, Timothy C ^a   Lendvay, Thomas S ^c  

^a Madigan Healthcare System   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c SEATTLE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

benchmarking; instrumentation; minimally invasive; robotics; surgical procedures; validation studies

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ELECTROMAGNETIC INSTRUMENT TRACKER; HUMAN; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; ROBOTIC SURGERY; ROBOTICS; SKILL; SURGEON; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; SUTURING METHOD; TASK PERFORMANCE;

CURRICULUM; ELECTROMAGNETIC PHENOMENA; HUMANS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84864954290     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. J.Y. Lee, P. Mucksavage, C.P. Sundaram Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing J Urol 185 2011 1191
2. A.S. Wright Validity in educational research: critically important but frequently misunderstood Arch Surg 145 2010 201
3. A.M. Derossis, G.M. Fried, M. Abrahamowicz Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills Am J Surg 175 1998 482
4. M.P. Fried, R. Satava, S. Weghorst The use of surgical simulators to reduce errors K. Henriksen, J.B. Battles, E.S. Marks, Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation vol 4 2005 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville
5. A.G. Gallagher, E.M. Ritter, R.M. Satava Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training Surg Endosc 17 2003 1525
6. G.M. Fried, L.S. Feldman, M.C. Vassiliou Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery Ann Surg 240 2004 518
7. S. Undre, A. Darzi Laparoscopy simulators J Endourol 21 2007 274
8. T.S. Lendvay, P. Casale, R. Sweet VR robotic surgery: randomized blinded study of the dV-Trainer robotic simulator Studies Health Technol Informatics 132 2008 242
9. A.S. Sethi, W.J. Peine, Y. Mohammadi Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator J Endourol 23 2009 503
10. T.S. Lendvay, P. Casale, R. Sweet Initial validation of a virtual-reality robotic simulator J Robotic Surg 2 2008 145
11. P.S. McDonough, T.J. Tausch, A.C. Peterson Initial validation of the ProMIS surgical simulator as an objective measure of robotic task performance J Robotic Surg 5 2011 195