Increasing public awareness of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: Health care access, internet use, and population density correlates

Journal of Cancer Epidemiology

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Finney Rutten, Lila J ^a   Gollust, Sarah E ^b   Naveed, Sana ^c   Moser, Richard P ^c  

^a SAIC FREDERICK INC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIRECT TO CONSUMER GENETIC TEST; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; FEMALE; GENETIC SCREENING; GRADUATE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84864952480     PISSN: 16878558     EISSN: 16878566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2012/309109     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hogarth S., Javitt G., Melzer D., The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 2008 9 161 182
2. Caulfield T., McGuire A. L., Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: perceptions, problems, and policy responses Annual Review of Medicine 2012 63 23 33
3. Bloss C. S., Darst B. F., Topol E. J., Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing Human Molecular Genetics 2011 20 2 R132 R141
4. McGuire A. L., Burke W., Health system implications of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing Public Health Genomics 2011 14 1 53 58
5. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 409, Direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic testing Obstetrics Gynecology 2008 111 6 1493 1494
6. Caulfield T., Ries N. M., Ray P. N., Shuman C., Wilson B., Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign? Clinical Genetics 2010 77 2 101 105
7. McGuire A. L., Burke W., An unwelcome side effect of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: raiding the medical commons Journal of the American Medical Association 2008 300 22 2669 2671
8. McGuire A. L., Evans B. J., Caulfield T., Burke W., Regulating direct-to-consumer personal genome testing Science 2010 330 6001 181 182
9. Offit K., Genomic profiles for disease risk: predictive or premature? Journal of the American Medical Association 2008 299 11 1353 1355 (Pubitemid 351439082)
10. Wolfberg A. J., Genes on the webdirect-to-consumer marketing of genetic testing The New England Journal of Medicine 2006 355 6 543 545 (Pubitemid 44200646)
11. Goddard K. A., Duquette D., Zlot A., Johnson J., Annis-Emeott A., Lee P. W., Bland M. P., Edwards K. L., Oehlke K., Giles R. T., Rafferty A., Cook M. L., Khoury M. J., Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: results from 3 state population-based surveys, 2006 American Journal of Public Health 2009 99 3 442 445
12. Bloss C. S., Schork N. J., Topol E. J., Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk The New England Journal of Medicine 2011 364 6 524 534
13. Goldsmith L., Jackson L., O'Connor A., Skirton H., Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives European Journal of Human Genetics 2012 20 8 811 816
14. McGuire A. L., Diaz C. M., Wang T., Hilsenbeck S. G., Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing American Journal of Bioethics 2009 9 6-7 3 10
15. Kolor K., Liu T., Pierre J. S., Khoury M. J., Health care provider and consumer awareness, perceptions, and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests, United States, 2008 Genetics in Medicine 2009 11 8 595
16. Langford A. T., Resnicow K., Roberts J. S., Zikmund-Fisher B. J., Racial and ethnic differences in direct-to-consumer genetic tests awareness in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic and numeracy correlates Journal of Genetic Counseling 2012 21 3 440 447
17. Myers M. F., Chang M. H., Jorgensen C., Whitworth W., Kassim S., Litch J. A., Armstrong L., Bernhardt B., Faucett W. A., Irwin D., Mouchawar J., Bradley L. A., Genetic testing for susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer: evaluating the impact of a direct-to-consumer marketing campaign on physicians' knowledge and practices Genetics in Medicine 2006 8 6 361 370 (Pubitemid 44297307)
18. Hock K. T., Christensen K. D., Yashar B. M., Roberts J. S., Gollust S. E., Uhlmann W. R., Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefs Genetics in Medicine 2011 13 4 325 332
19. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, National Broadband Map. cited 2011 April, 09, 2012, http://broadbandmap.gov/
20. Nelson D. E., Krepsa G., Hesse B., The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination Journal of Health Communication 2004 9 5 443 460 (Pubitemid 39434248)
21. Cantor D., Coa K., Crystal-Mansour S., Davis T., Dipko S., Sigman R.,. Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2007: Final Report, 2009
22. Finney Rutten L., Davis T., Burke Beckjord E., Blake K., Moser R. P., Hesse B. W., Picking up the pace: changes in method and frame for the health information National Trends Survey (20112014) Journal of Health Communication 2011 17 8
23. T.A.A.F.P.O.R., Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 7th edition. AAPOR, 2011
24. Research Triangle Institute, SUDAAN Version 9. Research Triangle Institute, Raleigh, NC, USA, 2008
25. Wolter K. M., Introduction to Variance Estimation 1985 New York, NY, USA Springer
26. McBride C. M., Alford S. H., Reid R. J., Larson E. B., Baxevanis A. D., Brody L. C., Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions Genetics in Medicine 2009 11 8 582 587
27. Gray S. W., Hornik R. C., Schwartz J. S., Armstrong K., The impact of risk information exposure on women's beliefs about direct-to-consumer genetic testing for BRCA mutations Clinical Genetics 2012 81 1 29 37
28. Gordon E. S., Griffin G., Wawak L., Pang H., Gollust S. E., Bernhardt B. A., It's not like judgment day: public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information Journal of Genetic Counseling 2012 21 3 423 432
29. Blumberg S. J., Luke J. V., Cynamon M. L., Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution American Journal of Public Health 2006 96 5 926 931
30. Fahimi M., Link M., Mokdad A., Schwartz D. A., Levy P., Tracking chronic disease and risk behavior prevalence as survey participation declines: statistics from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system and other national surveys Preventing Chronic Disease 2008 5 3 A80
31. Gentry E. M., Kalsbeek W. D., Hogelin G. C., The behavioral risk factor surveys: II. Design, methods, and estimates from combined state data American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1985 1 6 9 14 (Pubitemid 16154925)
32. Nelson D. E., Powell-Griner E., Town M., Kovar M. G., A comparison of national estimates from the National Health Interview Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System American Journal of Public Health 2003 93 8 1335 1341 (Pubitemid 38480203)
33. Cantor D., Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2007. Westat, Rockville, Md, USA, 2009
34. Kuehn B. M., Risks and benefits of direct-to-consumer genetic testing remain unclear Journal of the American Medical Association 2008 300 13 1503 1505
35. Kaye J., The regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic tests Human Molecular Genetics 2008 17 2 R180 R183