Effective connectivity between superior temporal gyrus and Heschl's gyrus during white noise listening: Linear versus non-linear models

Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 1-13

  Hamid, Khairiah Abdul ^a   Yusoff, A N ^a   Rahman, M Z A ^b   Mohamad, M ^a   Hamid, A I A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b NATIONAL HEART INSTITUTE   (Malaysia)

^c SCHOOL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Bayesian Model Selection (BMS); Dynamic causal modelling (DCM); fMRI; Non linear DCM

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BOLD SIGNAL; DYNAMIC CAUSAL MODELING; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HESCHL GYRUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROIMAGING; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIMARY AUDITORY CORTEX; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; WHITE NOISE;

EID: 84864940731     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18235530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2349/biij.8.2.e13     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Buxton RB. Introduction to functional magnetic resonance imaging: principles and techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
2. Yetkin FZ, Roland PS, Purdy PD and Christensen WF. Evaluation of auditory cortex activation by using silent FMRI. Am J Otolaryngol 2003; 24(5):281-289.
3. Dhankhar A, Wexler BE, Fulbright RK, Halwes T, Blamire AM and Shulman RG. Functional magnetic resonance imaging assessment of human auditory cortex response to increasing word presentation rates. J. Neurophysiol 1997; 77(1):476-483.
4. Belin P, Zatorre RJ, Lafaille P, Ahad P and Pike B. Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex. Nature 2000; 403(6767):309-312.
5. Belin, P, Zatorre RJ and Ahad P. Human temporal-lobe response to vocal sounds. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2002; 13(1):17-26.
6. Hart HC, Palmer AR and Hall DA. Heschl's gyrus is more sensitive to tone level than non-primary auditory cortex. Hear Res 2002; 171(1-2):177-190.
7. Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, Bellgowan PS, Springer JA, Kaufman JN and Possing ET. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cereb Cortex 2000; 10(5):512-528.
8. Liegeois-Chauvel C, Trebuchon-Dafonseca A, Regis J, Marquis P and Chauvel P. Auditory evoked potentials in the definition of eloquent cortical areas. Handbook of Clinical Neurophysiology 2003; 3:305-316.
9. Kumar S, Stephan KE, Warren JD, Friston KJ and Griffiths TD. Hierarchical processing of auditory objects in humans. PLoS Comput Biol 2007; 3(6):e100.
10. Friston KJ, Harrison L and Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 2003; 19(4):1273-1302.
11. Griffiths TD, Kumar S, Warren JD, Stewart L, Stephan KE and Friston KJ. Approaches to the cortical analysis of auditory subjects. Hear Res 2007; 229(1-2):46-53.
12. Stephan KE, Kasper L, Harrison LM, Daunizeau J, den Ouden HE, Breakspear M and Friston KJ. Non-linear dynamic causal models for fMRI. Neuroimage 2008; 42(2):649-662.
13. Stephan KE, Penny WD, Moran RJ, den Ouden HE, Daunizeau J and Friston KJ. Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage 2010; 49(4):3099-3109.
14. Bandettini PA, Jesmanowicz A, Wong EC and Hyde JS. Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain. Magn Reson Med 1993; 30(2):161-173.
15. Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA and Burdette JH. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlasbased interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage 2003; 19(3):1233-1239.
16. Penny WD, Holmes AP, Friston KJ. Random-effects analysis. In: Frackowiak RSJ, Friston KJ, Frith CD, Dolan RJ, Price CJ, Zeki S, Ashburner J, Penny WD (eds.) Human brain function. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2003. p. 599-632.
17. Stephan KE, Penny WD, Daunizeau J, Moran RJ and Friston KJ. Bayesian model selection for group studies. Neuroimage 2009; 46(4):1004-1017.
18. Mueller K, Mildner T, Fritz T, Lepsien J, Schwarzbauer C, Schroeter ML and Moller HE. Investigating brain response to music: a comparison of different fMRI acquisition schemes. Neuroimage 2011; 54(1):337-343.
19. Gaab N, Gabrieli JD and Glover GH. Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise. Hum Brain Mapp 2007; 28(8):703-720.
20. Hall DA, Johnsrude IS, Haggard MP, Palmer AR, Akeroyd MA and Summerfield AQ. Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex 2002; 12(2):140-149.
21. Morosan P, Rademacher J, Schleicher A, Amunts K, Schormann T and Zilles K. Human primary auditory cortex: cytoarchitectonic divisions and mapping into a spatial reference system. Neuroimage 2001; 13(4):684-701.
22. Upadhyay J, Silver A, Knaus TA, Lindgren KA, Ducros M, Kim DS and Tager-Flusberg H. Effective and structural connectivity in the human auditory cortex. J Neurosci 2008;28(13):3341-3349.
23. Wessinger CM, VanMeter J, Tian B, Van Lare J, Pekar J and Rauschecker JP. Hierarchical organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Cogn Neurosci 2001; 13(1):1-7.
24. Hwang JH, Wu CW, Chou PH, Liu TC and Chen JH. Hemispheric difference in activation patterns of human auditory-associated cortex: an fMRI study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2005; 67(4):242-246.
25. Specht K and Reul J. Functional segregation of the temporal lobes into highly differentiated subsystems for auditory perception: an auditory rapid event-related fMRI-task. Neuroimage 2003; 20(4):1944-1954.
26. Marreiros AC, Kiebel SJ and Friston KJ. Dynamic causal modelling for fMRI: a two-state model. Neuroimage 2008; 39(1):269-278.
27. Penny WD, Stephan KE, Mechelli A and Friston KJ. Comparing dynamic causal model. Neuroimage 2004; 22(3):1157-1172.
28. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Price CJ, Buchel C and Worsley KJ. Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage 1999; 10(4):385-396.
29. Kumar S, Stephan KE, Warren JD, Friston KJ and Griffiths TD. Hierarchical processing of auditory objects in humans. PLoS Comput Biol 2007; 3(6):e100
30. Rauschecker JP. Cortical processing of complex sounds. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1998; 8(4):516-521.
31. Rimol LM, Specht K, Weis S, Savoy R and Hugdahl K. Processing of sub-syllabic speech units in the posterior temporal lobe: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2005; 26(4):1059-1067.
32. Giraud AL, Lorenzi C, Ashburner J, Wable J, Johnsrude I, Frackowiak R and Kleinschmidt A. Representation of temporal envelope of sounds in the human brain. J Neurophysiol 2000; 84(3):1588-1598.
33. Binder JR, Rao SM, Hammeke TA, Frost JA, Bandettini PA and Hyde JS. Effect of stimulus rate on signal response during functional magnetic resonance imaging of the auditory cortex. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1994; 2(1):31-38.
34. Friston KJ and Buchel C. Attentional modulation of effective connectivity from V2 to V5/MT in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97(13):7591-7596.
35. Penny WD, Stephan KE, Mechelli A and Friston KJ. Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models. Neuroimage 2004; 23(Suppl 1):S264-S274.
36. Li X, Marrelec G, Hess RF and Benali H. A non-linear identification method to study effective connectivity in functional MRI. Med Img Anal 2010; 14(1):30-38.
37. Zucker RS and Regehr WG. Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Physiol 2002; 64:355-405.