Chapter 12: Yale lung cancer model

Risk Analysis

Volumn 32, Issue SUPPL.1, 2012, Pages

  Holford, Theodore R ^a   Ebisu, Keita ^b   Mckay, Lisa ^a   Oh, Cheongeun ^a   Zheng, Tongzhang ^c  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Yale University   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Age period cohort calibration; Cigarette smoking; Lung cancer; Population risk; Two stage clonal expansion model

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC APPROACH; CIGARETTE SMOKING; COMPLETE CONTROL; HARMFUL EFFECTS; LUNG CANCER; POPULATION DATA; TEMPORAL TRENDS; TOBACCO CONTROL; TWO-STAGE CLONAL EXPANSION MODEL;

DISEASES; PATHOLOGY; POPULATION STATISTICS;

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS;

AGE STRUCTURE; CALIBRATION; CANCER; CARCINOGEN; CLONAL GROWTH; COHORT ANALYSIS; DISEASE INCIDENCE; MORTALITY; SMOKING;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

NICOTIANA TABACUM;

EID: 84864928631     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01754.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Roush GC, Schymura MJ, Holford TR, White C, Flannery JT. Time period compared to birth cohort in Connecticut incidence rates for twenty-five malignant neoplasms. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1985; 74:779-788.
2. Roush GC, Holford TR, Schymura MJ, White C. Cancer risk and incidence trends: The Connecticut perspective. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corp., 1987.
3. Zheng T, Holford TR, Boyle P, Mayne ST, Liu W, Flannery J. Time trend and the age-period-cohort effect on the incidence of histologic types of lung cancer in Connecticut, 1960-1989. Cancer, 1994; 74:1556-1567.
4. U.S. Surgeon General's Advisory Committee on Smoking and Health. Smoking and health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service. Washington: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service; U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964.
5. Doll R, Peto R. The causes of cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1981; 66:1192-1308.
6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Washington: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2004.
7. Moolgavkar SH, Venson DJ. A stochastic two-stage model for cancer risk assessment. I. The hazard function and the probability of tumor. Mathematical Biosciences, 1979; 47:55-77.
8. Moolgavkar SH, Dewanji A, Venzon DJ. A stochastic two-stage model for cancer risk assessment. I. The hazard function and the probability of tumor. Risk Analysis, 1988; 8:383-392.
9. Moolgavkar SH, Luebeck EG. Two-event model for carcinogenesis: Biological, mathematical and statistical considerations. Risk Analysis, 1990; 10:323-341.
10. Luebeck EG, Moolgavkar SH. Multistage carcinogenesis and the incidence of colorectal cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002; 99:15, 095-15, 100.
11. Hazelton WD, Clements MS, Moolgavkar SH. Multistage carcinogenesis and lung cancer mortality in three cohorts. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2005; 14(5):1171-1181.
12. Hazelton WD, Jeon J, Meza R, Moolgavkar SH. The FHCRC lung cancer model. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(S1):S99-S116.
13. Anderson CM, Burns DM, Dodd KW, Feuer EJ. Birth cohort specific estimates of smoking behaviors for the U.S. population. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(S1):S14-S24.
14. Jeon J, Meza R, Krapcho M, Clarke LD, Byrne J, Levy DT. Actual and counterfactual smoking prevalence rates in the U.S. population via microsimulation. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(S1):S51-S68.
15. Holford TR, Clarke LD. Development of the counterfactual smoking histories used to assess the effects of tobacco control. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(S1):S39-S50.
16. Fienberg SE, Mason WM. Identification and estimation of age-period-cohort models in the analysis of discrete archival data. Pp. 1-67 in Schuessler KF (ed). Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 1978.
17. Holford TR. The estimation of age, period and cohort effects for vital rates. Biometrics, 1983; 39:311-324.
18. Kupper LL, Janis JM, Salama IA, Yoshizawa CN, Greenberg BG. Age-period-cohort analysis: An illustration of the problems in assessing interaction in one observation per cell data. Communication in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 1983; 12:2779-2807.
19. Kupper LL, Janis JM, Karmous A, Greenberg BG. Statistical age-period-cohort analysis: A review and critique. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1985; 38:811-830.
20. Holford TR. Age-period-cohort analysis. Pp. 82-99 in Armitage P, Colton T (eds). Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
21. Rogers WL. Estimable functions of age, period, and cohort effects. American Sociological Review, 1982; 47:774-796.
22. Clayton D, Schifflers E. Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. I: Age-period and age-cohort models. Statistics in Medicine, 1987; 6:449-467.
23. Clayton D, Schifflers E. Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. II: Age-period-cohort models. Statistics in Medicine, 1987; 6:469-481.
24. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall, 1989.
25. Aranda-Ordaz FJ. On two families of transformations to additivity for binary response data. Biometrika, 1981; 68:357-363.
26. Holford TR. Multivariate Methods in Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
27. Holford TR, Roush GC, McKay LA. Trends in female breast cancer in Connecticut and the United States. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991; 44:29-39.
28. Holford TR, Levy DT. Comparing the adequacy of carcinogenesis models in estimating U.S. population rates for lung cancer mortality. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(S1):S179-S189.
29. Knoke JD, Shanks TG, Vaughn JW, Thun MJ, Burns DM. Lung cancer mortality is related to age in addition to duration and intensity of cigarette smoking: An analysis of CPS-I data. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 2004; 13(6):949-957.
30. Doll R. Cancer and aging: The epidemiologic evidence. Pp. 1-28 in Clark RL, Cummley RW, McCoy TE; et al., (eds). Proceedings of the Tenth International Cancer Conference. Vol. V. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc., 1971.