Gene expression confirms a potentially receptive endometrium identified by histology in fertile women

Human Reproduction

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 2747-2755

  Evans, G E ^a   Phillipson, G T M ^b   Sin, I L ^b   Frampton, C M A ^a   Kirker, J A ^c   Bigby, S M ^d   Evans, J J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b Repromed   (New Zealand)

^c Labtests   (New Zealand)

^d MIDDLEMORE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

cell proliferation; histology; mRNA gene expression; non receptive endometrium; receptive endometrium

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL MARKER; CERULOPLASMIN; DICKKOPF 1 PROTEIN; ENDOCRINE GLAND DERIVED VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR; GLYCOPROTEIN; LUTEINIZING HORMONE; MESSENGER RNA;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CELL POPULATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL VACUOLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; FEMALE FERTILITY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; LASER MICRODISSECTION; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; STROMA CELL;

EID: 84864916505     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des233     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Affymetrix (2003). Design and performance of the GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 and Human Genome U133A 2.0 arrays. Technical Note.
2. AgilentTechnologies (2009). One-Color Microarray-Based Gene Expression Analysis. Protocol Version 6.0, USA.
3. Barash A, Dekel N, Fieldust S, Segal I, Schechtman E, Granot I. Local injury to the endometrium doubles the incidence of successful pregnancies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2003;79:1317-1322. (Pubitemid 36687877)
4. Caretti E, Devarajan K, Coudry R, Ross E, Clapper ML, Cooper HS, Bellacosa A. Comparison of RNA amplification methods and chip platforms for microarray analysis of samples processed by laser capture microdissection. J Cell Biochem 2008;103:556-563. (Pubitemid 351171926)
5. Chang JT, Nevins JR. GATHER: a systems approach to interpreting genomic signatures. Bioinformatics 2006;22:2926-2933. (Pubitemid 44811565)
6. Critchley HO, Saunders PT. Hormone receptor dynamics in a receptive human endometrium. Reprod Sci 2009;16:191-199.
7. Davis OK, Berkeley AS, Naus GJ, Cholst IN, Freedman KS. The incidence of luteal phase defect in normal, fertile women, determined by serial endometrial biopsies. Fertil Steril 1989;51:582-586. (Pubitemid 19097768)
8. Diedrich K, Fauser BC, Devroey P, Griesinger G. The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation. Hum Reprod Update 2007;13:365-377. (Pubitemid 47062829)
9. Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA. affy-analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 2004;20:307-315. (Pubitemid 38262761)
10. Gibson M, Badger GJ, Byrn F, Lee KR, Korson R, Trainer TD. Error in histologic dating of secretory endometrium: variance component analysis. Fertil Steril 1991;56:242-247.
11. Giudice LC. Potential biochemical markers of uterine receptivity. Hum Reprod 1999;14(Suppl 2):3-16. (Pubitemid 30040659)
12. Giudice LC. Application of functional genomics to primate endometrium: insights into biological processes. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2006:4(Suppl 1):S4.
13. Gnainsky Y, Granot I, Aldo PB, Barash A, Or Y, Schechtman E, Mor G, Dekel N. Local injury of the endometrium induces an inflammatory response that promotes successful implantation. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:2030-2036.
14. Haouzi D, Mahmoud K, Fourar M, Bendhaou K, Dechaud H, De Vos J, Reme T, Dewailly D, Hamamah S. Identification of new biomarkers of human endometrial receptivity in the natural cycle. Hum Reprod 2009; 24:198-205.
15. Horcajadas JA, Minguez P, Dopazo J, Esteban FJ, Dominguez F, Giudice LC, Pellicer A, Simon C. Controlled ovarian stimulation induces a functional genomic delay of the endometrium with potential clinical implications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:4500-4510. (Pubitemid 352789553)
16. Horne FM, Blithe DL. Progesterone receptor modulators and the endometrium: changes and consequences. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13:567-580. (Pubitemid 350018525)
17. Kalma Y, Granot I, Gnainsky Y, Or Y, Czernobilsky B, Dekel N, Barash A. Endometrial biopsy-induced gene modulation: first evidence for the expression of bladder-transmembranal uroplakin Ib in human endometrium. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1042-1049, 1049.e1041-1049
18. Karimzadeh MA, Ayazi Rozbahani M, Tabibnejad N. Endometrial local injury improves the pregnancy rate among recurrent implantation failure patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomised clinical trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;49:677-680.
19. Kerin JF, Warnes GM, Crocker J, Broom TG, Ralph MM, Matthews CD, Seamark RF, Cox LM. 3-hour urinary radioimmunoassay for luteinising hormone to detect onset of preovulatory LH surge. Lancet 1980; 2:431-432.
20. Kim KI, van de Wiel MA. Effects of dependence in high-dimensional multiple testing problems. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:114.
21. Lenton EA, Landgren BM, Sexton L. Normal variation in the length of the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: identification of the short luteal phase. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984a;91:685-689. (Pubitemid 14086882)
22. Lenton EA, Landgren BM, Sexton L, Harper R. Normal variation in the length of the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle: effect of chronological age. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984b;91:681-684. (Pubitemid 14086881)
23. Li TC, Rogers AW, Lenton EA, Dockery P, Cooke I. A comparison between two methods of chronological dating of human endometrial biopsies during the luteal phase, and their correlation with histologic dating. Fertil Steril 1987;48:928-932. (Pubitemid 18008195)
24. Lindhard A, Ravn V, Bentin-Ley U, Horn T, Bangsboell S, Rex S, Toft B, Soerensen S. Ultrasound characteristics and histological dating of the endometrium in a natural cycle in infertile women compared with fertile controls. Fertil Steril 2006;86:1344-1355. (Pubitemid 44602039)
25. Macdonald LJ, Sales KJ, Grant V, Brown P, Jabbour HN, Catalano RD. Prokineticin 1 induces Dickkopf 1 expression and regulates cell proliferation and decidualization in the human endometrium. Mol Hum Reprod 2011;17:626-636.
26. Mazur MT, Kurman RJ. Diagnosis of Endometrial Biopsies and Curettings, 2nd edn. New York, USA: Springer, 2005.
27. McIntosh JE, Matthews CD, Crocker JM, Broom TJ, Cox LW. Predicting the luteinizing hormone surge: relationship between the duration of the follicular and luteal phases and the length of the human menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 1980;34:125-130. (Pubitemid 10058917)
28. Munster K, Schmidt L, Helm P. Length and variation in the menstrual cycle-a cross-sectional study from a Danish county. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:422-429.
29. Murray MJ, Meyer WR, Zaino RJ, Lessey BA, Novotny DB, Ireland K, Zeng D, Fritz MA. A critical analysis of the accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility of histologic endometrial dating in fertile women. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1333-1343. (Pubitemid 38609319)
30. Narvekar SA, Gupta N, Shetty N, Kottur A, Srinivas M, Rao KA. Does local endometrial injury in the nontransfer cycle improve the IVF-ET outcome in the subsequent cycle in patients with previous unsuccessful IVF? A randomized controlled pilot study. J Hum Reprod Sci 2010;3:15-19.
31. Noyes RW, Haman JO. Accuracy of endometrial dating; correlation of endometrial dating with basal body temperature and menses. Fertil Steril 1953;4:504-517.
32. Noyes RW, Hertig AW, Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril 1950;1:3-25.
33. NuGEN Technologies1 (2008). WT-OvationTM FFPE RNA Amplification System Version 2.0. Cat. No. #3400-12/60. User Guide Cat. No. #D01018.
34. Oehninger S. Revealing the enigmas of implantation: what is the true impact of ovarian hyperstimulation? Fertil Steril 2008;89: 27-30.
35. Ponnampalam AP, Weston GC, Susil B, Rogers PA. Molecular profiling of human endometrium during the menstrual cycle. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;46:154-158.
36. Rahnama F, Thompson B, Steiner M, Shafiei F, Lobie PE, Mitchell MD. Epigenetic regulation of E-cadherin controls endometrial receptivity. Endocrinology 2009;150:1466-1472.
37. Robboy SJ, Mutter GL, Prat J, Bentley RC, Russell P, Anderson MC. Robboy's Pathology of the Female Reproductive Tract, Second, Elsevier, USA: Churchill Livingstone, 2008.
38. Roger M, Grenier J, Houlbert C, Castanier M, Feinstein MC, Scholler R. Rapid radioimmunoassays of plasma LH and estradiol-17 beta for the prediction of ovulation. J Steroid Biochem 1980;12:403-410. (Pubitemid 10075365)
39. Scotchie JG, Fritz MA, Mocanu M, Lessey BA, Young SL. Proteomic analysis of the luteal endometrial secretome. Reprod Sci 2009; 16:883-893.
40. Scott RT, Snyder RR, Bagnall JW, Reed KD, Adair CF, Hensley SD. Evaluation of the impact of intraobserver variability on endometrial dating and the diagnosis of luteal phase defects. Fertil Steril 1993; 60:652-657. (Pubitemid 23298509)
41. Smith S, Hosid S, Scott L. Endometrial biopsy dating. Interobserver variation and its impact on clinical practice. J Reprod Med 1995;40:1-3.
42. Smyth GK. LIMMA: linear models for microarray data. In: Gentleman R, Carey V, Huber W, Irizarry R, Dudoit S (eds). Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor. New York: Springer, 2005,397-420.
43. Talbi S, Hamilton AE, Vo KC, Tulac S, Overgaard MT, Dosiou C, Le Shay N, Nezhat CN, Kempson R, Lessey BA et al. Molecular phenotyping of human endometrium distinguishes menstrual cycle phases and underlying biological processes in normo-ovulatory women. Endocrinology 2006;147:1097-1121. (Pubitemid 43244341)
44. WHO Task Force Investigators. Temporal relationships between ovulation and defined changes in the concentration of plasma estradiol-17 beta, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and progesterone. I. Probit analysis. World Health Organization, Task Force on Methods for the Determination of the Fertile Period, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;138:383-390.