Additive interaction in survival analysis: Use of the additive hazards model

Epidemiology

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 733-737

  Rod, Naja Hulvej ^a   Lange, Theis ^a   Andersen, Ingelise ^a   Marott, Jacob Louis ^b   Diderichsen, Finn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b BISPEBJERG HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMOKING HABIT; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL RATE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EFFECT MODIFIER, EPIDEMIOLOGIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SMOKING; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84864876765     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: 15315487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31825fa218     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Jensen MK, Chiuve SE, Rimm EB, et al. Obesity, behavioral lifestyle factors, and risk of acute coronary events. Circulation. 2008;117:3062-3069.
2. Nielsen NR, Gronbaek M. Interactions between intakes of alcohol and postmenopausal hormones on risk of breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:1109-1113.
3. Minelli C, Wei I, Sagoo G, Jarvis D, Shaheen S, Burney P. Interactive effects of antioxidant genes and air pollution on respiratory function and airway disease: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:603-620.
4. Greenland S. Interactions in epidemiology: relevance, identification, and estimation. Epidemiology. 2009;20:14-17.
5. Rothman KJ. Modern Epidemiology, 1st ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company; 1986.
6. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Walker AM. Concepts of interaction. Am J Epidemiol. 1980;112:467-470.
7. Rothman K. Measuring interactions. In: Rothman K, ed. Epidemiology: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002:168-180.
8. Li R, Chambless L. Test for additive interaction in proportional hazards models. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:227-236.
9. Skrondal A. Interaction as departure from additivity in case-control studies: a cautionary note. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:251-258.
10. Blas E, Kurup AS. Equity, Social Determinants and Public Health Programmes. Switzerland: World Health Association; 2010.
11. Marmot MG, Shipley MJ, Rose G. Inequalities in death-specific explanations of a general pattern? Lancet. 1984;1:1003-1006.
12. Makela P, Paljarvi T. Do consequences of a given pattern of drinking vary by socioeconomic status? A mortality and hospitalisation follow-up for alcohol-related causes of the Finnish Drinking Habits Surveys. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62:728-733.
13. Lynch J, Davey SG, Harper S, Bainbridge K. Explaining the social gradient in coronary heart disease: comparing relative and absolute risk approaches. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:436-441.
14. Appleyard M, Hansen AT, Schnohr P, Jensen G, Nyboe J. The Copenhagen city heart study. A book of tables with data from the first examination (1976-1978) and a 5-year follow-up (1981-83). Scand J Pub Health. 1989;170:1-160.
15. Tjonneland A, Olsen A, Boll K, et al. Study design, exposure variables, and socioeconomic determinants of participation in Diet, Cancer and Health: a population-based prospective cohort study of 57,053 men and women in Denmark. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35:432-441.
16. Osler M, Linneberg A, Glumer C, Jorgensen T. The cohorts at the Research Centre for Prevention and Health, formerly "The Glostrup Population Studies." Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:602-610.
17. Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology. 1999;10:37-48.
18. Vanderweele TJ, Knol MJ. Interpretation of subgroup analyses in randomized trials: heterogeneity versus secondary interventions. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:680-683.
19. Bofetta P, Trichopoulos D. Cancer of the lung, larynx, and pleura. In: Adami HO, Hunter D, Trichopoulos D, eds. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002.
20. Aalen O. A model for non-parametric regression analysis of counting processes. In: Klonecki W, Kozek A, eds. Lecture Notes in Statistics, Mathematical Statistics and Probability Theory. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1980.
21. Martinussen T, Scheike T. Dynamic Regression Models for Survival Data. New York, NY: Springer; 2006.
22. Mckeague IW, Sasieni PD. A partly parametric additive risk model. Biometrika. 1994;81:501-514.
23. Aalen O, Borgan Ø, Gjessing HK. Survival and Event History Analysis: A Process Point of View. New York: Springer; 2008.
24. Vandenbroucke JP, von EE, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007;18:805-835.
25. Brumback B, Berg A. On effect-measure modification: Relationships among changes in the relative risk, odds ratio, and risk difference. Stat Med. 2008;27:3453-3465.
26. Vanderweele TJ. On the distinction between interaction and effect modification. Epidemiology. 2009;20:863-871.
27. Kaufman JS. Interaction reaction. Epidemiology. 2009;20:159-160.
28. Vanderweele TJ. Sufficient cause interactions and statistical interactions. Epidemiology. 2009;20:6-13.
29. Vanderweele TJ. Causal interactions in the proportional hazards model. Epidemiology. 2011;22:713-717.
30. Lawlor DA. Biological interaction: time to drop the term? Epidemiology. 2011;22:148-150.
31. Blot WJ, Day NE. Synergism and interaction: are they equivalent? Am J Epidemiol. 1979;110:99-100.
32. Saracci R. Interaction and synergism. Am J Epidemiol. 1980;112:465-466.