Some unfinished thoughts on strong Yukawa couplings

Chinese Journal of Physics

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 375-384

  Hou, Wei Shu ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864866562     PISSN: 05779073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Summary talk by M. E. Peskin at Lepton Photon Symposium, August 2011, Mumbai, India
2. Plenary talks by G. Tonneli, D. Charlton, and B. Murray at Europhysics Conference on High-Energy Physics, July 2011, Grenoble, France.
3. Plenary talks by A. Nisati, and V. Sharma at Lepton Photon Symposium, August 2011, Mum-bai, India.
4. Special seminars delivered by F. Gianotti and G. Tonneli on December 13, 2011, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
5. B. W. Lee, C. Quigg, and H. B. Thacker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 883 (1977)
6. B. W. Lee, C. Quigg, and H. B. Phys. Rev. D 16, 1519 (1977).
7. M. S. Chanowitz, M. A. Furman, and I. Hinchliffe, Phys. Lett. B 78, 285 (1978)
8. M. S. Chanowitz, M. A. Nucl. Phys. B 153, 402 (1979).
9. Public Analysis Summaries (PAS) CMS-EXO-11-036, CMS-EXO-11-050, CMS-EXO-11-051, and CMS-EXO-11-054 of the CMS Collaboration
10. Talks by G. Tonneli in Ref. [2], and A. Nisati in Ref. [3].
11. In fact, cross section enhancement when both the Higgs and Q are very heavy demands closer scrutiny. For a recent discussion, see A. Denner et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1992 (2012).
12. See, e.g., B. Holdom, JHEP 0608, 076 (2006), and references therein.
13. K. Nakamura et al. [Particle Data Group], J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010).
14. G. 't Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B 44, 189 (1972).
15. G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B 35, 167 (1971). The author attributes the demonstration for the global gauge symmetry case to work done by B. W. Lee, K. Symanzik, and J.-L. Gervais.
16. A brief account was given earlier in G. W.-S. Hou, PoS ICHEP2010, 244 (2010) [arXiv:1101.2158 [hep-ph]].
17. Strictly speaking, only the on-shell S-matrix is finite in the U-gauge. We thank T. Kugo for the comment, and take it as a limiting case of the Rξ gauge for sake of illustration.
18. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
19. For a recent brief review, see see B. Holdom et al., PMC Phys. A 3, 4 (2009).
20. G. D. Kribs, T. Plehn, M. Spannowsky, and T. M. P. Tait, Phys. Rev. D 76, 075016 (2007).
21. K. Ishiwata and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 83, 074015 (2011).
22. P. Jain et al., Phys. Rev. D 46, 4029 (1992).
23. T. Enkhbat, W.-S. Hou, and H. Yokoya, Phys. Rev. D 84, 094013 (2011).
24. T. Kugo, Phys. Lett. B 76, 625 (1978).
25. P. Q. Hung and C. Xiong, Nucl. Phys. B 848, 288 (2011).
26. P. Q. Hung and C. Xiong, Phys. Lett. B 694, 430 (2011)
27. P. Q. Hung and C. Xiong, Nucl. Phys. B 847, 160 (2011).
28. R. Fukuda and T. Kugo, Nucl. Phys. B 117, 250 (1976).
29. W. A. Bardeen, C. N. Leung, and S. T. Love, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1230 (1986)
30. C. N. Leung, S. T. Love, and W. A. Bardeen, Nucl. Phys. B 273, 649 (1986).
31. H. Pagels and S. Stokar, Phys. Rev. D 20, 2947 (1979).
32. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961)
33. W. A. Bardeen, C. T. Hill, and M. Lindner, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1647 (1990).
34. S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS Collaboration], JHEP 1205, 123 (2012).
35. Y. Mimura, W.-S. Hou and H. Kohyama, manuscript in preparation.