A comparative study of volumetric breast density estimation in digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging: Results from a high-risk population

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 7624, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Kontos, Despina ^a   Xing, Ye ^b   Bakic, Predrag R ^a   Conant, Emily F ^a   Maidment, Andrew D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

breast cancer risk; Digital mammography; magnetic resonance imaging; volumetric breast density

Indexed keywords

CLOUDS; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAGNETIC LEVITATION VEHICLES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETISM; RESONANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

BREAST CANCER RISK; BREAST CANCER RISK ASSESSMENTS; COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; IMAGE ANALYSIS METHOD; PARTIAL VOLUME EFFECT; SEGMENTATION ALGORITHMS; VOLUMETRIC BREAST DENSITIES;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 84864864800     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.845568     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;356(3):227-236.
2. Yaffe MJ. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Research. Epub 2008 Jun 19 2008;10(3):209.
3. Martin KE, Helvie MA, Zhou C, et al. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories. Radiology. 2006;240(3):656-665.
4. Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE. Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk. Radiology. 2004;230:29-41.
5. Hartman K, Highnam R, Warren R, Jackson V. Volumetric Assessment of Breast Tissue Composition from FFDM Images. Paper presented at: Digital Mammography (IWDM), 2008.
6. Khazen M, Warren RM, Boggis CR, et al. A pilot study of compositional analysis of the breast and estimation of breast mammographic density using three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Sep 2008;17(9):2268-2274.
7. Klifa C, Carballido-Gamio J, Wilmes L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for secondary assessment of breast density in a high-risk cohort. Magn Reson Imaging. Jan 2009;28(1):8-15.
8. Kopans DB. Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk. Radiology. Feb 2008;246(2):348-353.
9. Kontos D, Bakic PR, Carton AK, Troxel AB, Conant EF, Maidment ADA. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer risk estimation: A preliminary study. Academic Radiology. 2009;16(3):283-298.
10. Weinstein SP, Localio AR, Conant EF, Rosen M, Thomas KM, Schnall MD. Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. Dec 20 2009;27(36):6124-6128.
11. Highnam R, Jeffreys M, McCormack V, Warren R, Davey Smith G, Brady M. Comparing measurements of breast density. Phys Med Biol. Oct 7 2007;52(19):5881-5895.
12. Understanding R2 Quantra 1.3, Hologic Inc. (Software Manual) 2009.
13. Xing Y, Ou Y, Englander S, Schnall MD, Shen D. Simultaneous Estimation and Segmentation of T1 Map for Breast Parenchyma Measurement. Paper presented at: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2007; Washington, DC.
14. Xing Y, Xue Z, Englander S, Schnall MD, Shen D. Improving Parenchyma Segmentation by Simultaneous Estimation of Tissue Property T1 Map and Group-Wise Registration of Inversion Recovery MR Breast Images. Paper presented at: 11th International Conference of Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), 2008; New York, NY.
15. McCormack VA, Dos Santos S. I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a metaanalysis. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2006;15(6):1159-1169.
16. McCormack VA, Highnam R, Perry N, Dos Santos S. I. Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement: intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Jun 2007;16(6):1148-1154.
17. Jeffreys M, Warren R, Highnam R, Davey Smith G. Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study. Br J Cancer. Jan 15 2008;98(1):210-216.
18. Vandeweyer E, Hertens D. Quantification of glands and fat in breast tissue: an experimental determination. Ann Anat. Mar 2002;184(2):181-184.
19. Han T, Lai C-J, Chen L, et al. Breast density measurement: 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images versus 2D digital mammograms. Paper presented at: SPIE Medical Imaging: Physics of Medical Imaging, 2009; Orlando, FL.
20. Shepherd JA, Kerlikowske KM, Smith-Bindman R, Genant HK, Cummings SR. Measurement of breast density with dual X-ray absorptiometry: feasibility. Radiology. May 2002;223(2):554-557.
21. Kleijnen JPC. Statistical validation of simulation models. Eur. J. Operations Research. 1995;87:21-43.
22. Kleijnen JPC. Verification and validation of simulation models. Eur. J. Operations Research. 1995;82:145-162.