Mammographic parenchymal texture analysis for estrogen-receptor subtype specific breast cancer risk estimation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7361 LNCS, Issue , 2012, Pages 596-603

  Karemore, Gopal ^a,b   Keller, Brad M ^a   Oh, Huen ^a   Tchou, Julia ^a   Nielsen, Mads ^b   Conant, Emily F ^a   Kontos, Despina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; mammogram parenchymal texture; sub type specific risk

Indexed keywords

AGE-MATCHED CONTROLS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CANCER RISK ASSESSMENTS; BREAST CANCER RISK ESTIMATIONS; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST PERCENT DENSITIES; CASE-CONTROL STUDY; CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; MAMMOGRAPHIC; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; TEXTURE FEATURES;

DISEASES; MAMMOGRAPHY; TEXTURES;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 84864863377     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_77     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Shelley Hwang, E., Chew, T., Shiboski, S., Farren, G., Benz, C.C., Wrensch, M.: Risk factors for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. ARCH SURG 140, 58-62 (2005
2. Savage, L.: Researchers wonder why high-risk women are not taking chemoprevention drugs. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 99, 913-914 (2007
3. Aiello, E.J., Buist, D.S.M., White, E.: Association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 14, 662-668 (2005
4. Boyd, N.F., Melnichouk, O., Martin, L.J., Hislop, G., Chiarelli, A.M., Yaffe, M.J., Minkin, S.: Mammographic density, response to hormones, and breast cancer risk. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 2985-2992 (2011
5. Heine, J.J., Malhotra, P.: Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis and digital mammography. part 1 tissue and related risk factors. Academic Radiology 9(3), 115-122 (2002
6. Li, H., Giger, M.L., Olopade, O.I., Margolis, A., Lan, L., Chinander, M.R.: Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms. Acad. Radiol. 12(7), 863-873 (2005
7. Yerushalmi, R., Woods, R., Kennecke, H., Speers, C., Knowling, M., Gelmon, K.: Patterns of relapse in breast cancer: changes over time. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 120, 753-759 (2010
8. Nielsen, M., Karemore, G., Loog, M., Raundahl, J., Karssemeijer, N., Otten, J.D., Karsdal, M.A., Vachon, C.M., Christiansen, C.: A novel and automatic mammographic texture resemblance marker is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 35, 381-387 (2011
9. Karemore, G., Brandt, S., Sporring, J., Nielsen, M.: Anisotropic diffusion tensor applied to temporal mammograms: an application to breast cancer risk assessment. In: Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (2010
10. Young, R.A.: The gaussian derivative model for spatial vision: I. retinal mechanisms. Spat. Vis. 2(4), 273-293 (1987
11. Weickert, J.: Coherence-enhancing diffusion filtering. Int. J. Comput. Vision 31, 111-127 (1999
12. Karahaliou, A., Skiadopoulos, S., Boniatis, I., Sakellaropoulos, P., Likaki, E., Panayiotakis, G., Costaridou, L.: Texture analysis of tissue surrounding microcalcifications on mammograms for breast cancer diagnosis. Br. J. Radiol. (2007
13. van den Boomgaard, R.: Algorithms for non-linear diffusion. Technical report, Intelligent Sensory Information Systems, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ Amsterdam,The Netherlands
14. Keller, B., Nathan, D., Wang, Y., Zheng, Y., Gee, J., Conant, E., Kontos, D.: Adaptive multi-cluster fuzzy c-means segmentation of breast parenchymal tissue in digital mammography. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 14(3), 562-569 (2011
15. Arya, S., Mount, D.M., Netanyahu, N.S., Silverman, R., Wu, A.Y.: An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching fixed dimensions. J. ACM 45, 891-923 (1998
16. Geng, X., Liu, T.-Y., Qin, T., Li, H.: Feature Selection for Ranking, vol. (49), pp. 407-414. ACM Press (2007
17. DeLong, E.R., DeLong, D.M., Clarke-Pearson, D.L.: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3), 837-845 (1988
18. Hanley, J.A., McNeil, B.J.: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve. Radiology 143, 29-36 (1982
19. Ziv, E., Tice, J., Smith-Bindman, R., Shepherd, J., Cummings, S., Kerlikowske, K.: Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers Prevention 13(12), 2090-2095 (2004
20. Kostopoulos, S., Cavouras, D., Daskalakis, A., Kalatzis, I., Bougioukos, P., Kagadis, G.C., Ravazoula, P., Nikiforidis, G.: Assessing Estrogen Receptors' Status by Texture Analysis of Breast Tissue Specimens and Pattern Recognition Methods. In: Kropatsch, W.G., Kampel, M., Hanbury, A. (eds.) CAIP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4673, pp. 221-228. Springer, Heidelberg (2007
21. Hines, L.M., Risendal, B., Slattery, M.L.: Differences in estrogen receptor subtype according to family history of breast cancer among hispanic, but not non-hispanic white women. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 17, 2700-2706 (2008)