Automatic differential segmentation of the prostate in 3-D MRI using Random Forest classification and graph-cuts optimization

Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1727-1730

  Moschidis, Emmanouil ^a   Graham, Jim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Automatic Segmentation; Graph Cuts; MRI; Prostate Zones; Random Forests

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED APPROACH; AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATIONS; BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; CLASSIFICATION SCHEME; CONTEXTUAL CONSTRAINTS; GRAPH-CUTS; GROUND TRUTH; INTERACTIVE SEGMENTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGES; MARKOV RANDOM FIELD MODEL; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; PROSTATE ZONES; RANDOM FOREST CLASSIFICATION; RANDOM FOREST CLASSIFIER; RANDOM FORESTS; SEMI-AUTOMATICS; SMALL TRAINING;

AUTOMATION; DECISION TREES; GRAPHIC METHODS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING; OPTIMIZATION; UROLOGY;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84864858854     PISSN: 19457928     EISSN: 19458452     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISBI.2012.6235913     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. A. Thorpe and D. Neal, "Benign prostatic hyperplasia,"Lancet, vol. 361, no. 9366, pp. 1359-67,2003.
2. A. Tewari, K. Shinohara and P. Narayan, "Transitional Zone Volume and Transitional Zone Ratio: Predictor of Uroflow Response to Finasteride Therapy in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients," Urology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 258-265, 1995.
3. N. Makni et al, "Automatic 3D segmentation of prostate in MRI combining a priori knowledge, Markov fields and Bayesian framework," inProc. EMBS, 2008, pp. 2992-2995.
4. S. Klein et al, "Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3-D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information," Medical Physics, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1407-1417,2008.
5. E. Moschidis and J. Graham, "Propagating interactive segmentation of a single 3D example on similar images: an evaluation study using MR images of the prostate," in Proc. ISBI, 2011, pp. 1472-1475.
6. P. D. Allen et al, "Differential segmentation of the prostate in MR images using combined 3D shape modelling and voxel classification," in Proc. ISBI, 2006, pp. 410-13.
7. E. Moschidis and J. Graham, "A systematic performance evaluation of interactive image segmentation methods based on Simulated User Interaction," in Proc. ISBI, 2010, pp. 928-931.
8. L. Breiman, "Random forests," Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1,pp. 5-32,2001.
9. A. Jaiantilal, "randomforest-matlab," November 2011. [Online]. Available: http://code.google.eom/p/randomforest-matlab/
10. J. Santner et al., "Interactive Texture Segmentation using Random Forests and Total Variation," in Proc. BMVC, 2009, pp. 1-12.
11. R. M. Haralick, "Statistical and structural approaches to texture," Proc. IEEE, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 786-804,1979.
12. M. T. Suzuki, Y. Yaginuma and H. Kodama, "A texture energy measurement technique for 3D volumetric data," in Proc. SMC, 2009, pp. 3779-3785.
13. D. Greig, B. Porteous, and A. Seheult, "Exact maximum a posteriori estimation for binary images," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 271-279, 1989.
14. Y. Boykov and M.-P. Jolly, "Interactive graph cuts for optimal boundary and region segmentation of objects in N-D images," in Proc. ICCV, 2001, vol. 1, pp.105-112.
15. Y. Boykov and V. Kolmogorov, "An experimental comparison of min-cut/max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision,"IEEE T-PAMI, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1124-1137,2004.