Fuzzy Representation of Pavement Condition for Efficient Pavement Management

Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 608-619

  Bianchini, Alessandra ^a  

^a U S ARMY ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONS; CONDITION ASSESSMENTS; FUZZY INFERENCE MODEL; FUZZY REPRESENTATIONS; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; MAINTENANCE PLANNING; PAVEMENT CONDITION; PAVEMENT CONDITION ASSESSMENT; PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT; PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; PROJECT PLANNING;

SURVEYING;

PAVEMENTS;

AUTOMATION; CIVIL ENGINEERING; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; MODEL TEST; NUMERICAL MODEL; PAVEMENT;

EID: 84864843693     PISSN: 10939687     EISSN: 14678667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00758.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adeli, H. & Karim, A. (2000), Fuzzy-wavelet RBFNN model for freeway incident detection, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 126(6), 464-71.
2. Adeli, H. & Kumar, S. (1999), Distributed Computer-Aided Engineering for Analysis, Design, and Visualization, CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
3. Adeli, H. & Sarma, K. C. (2006), Cost Optimization of Structures: Fuzzy Logic, Genetic Algorithms, and Parallel Computing, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England.
4. Banan, M. R. & Hjelmstad, K. D. (1996), Neural networks and AASHO road test, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 122(5), 358-66.
5. Bianchini, A. & Bandini, P. (2010), Prediction of pavement performance through neuro-fuzzy reasoning, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24, 1-16.
6. Bianchini, A., Bandini, P. & Smith, D. W. (2010), Interrater reliability of manual pavement distress evaluations, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136(2), 165-72.
7. Chamorro, A., Tighe, S. L., Ningyuan, L. & Kazmierowski, T. (2009), Development of distress guidelines and condition rating to improve network management in the province of Ontario, in Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC.
8. Elton, D. J. & Juang, C. H. (1989), Asphalt pavement evaluation using fuzzy sets, in National Research Council (ed.), Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1196, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC, pp. 1-6.
9. Glover, T. C., Walters, J. V., Turner, D. S. & Mansfield, E. R. (1985), A pavement rating procedure. TSM Report No. 112-85, BER Report No., 352-39.
10. Goodman, I. R. & Nguyen, H. T. (1985), Uncertainty models for knowledge-based systems: a unified approach to the measurement of uncertainty, North-Holland, Amsterdam .
11. Hellendoorn, H. & Thomas, C. (1993), Defuzzification in fuzzy controllers, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 1 (12), 689-97.
12. Holguin-Veras, J. (1997), Alternative modeling framework for pavement serviceability analysis, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 123(6), 478-83.
13. Karim, A. & Adeli, H. (2002), Comparison of the fuzzy-wavelet RBFNN freeway incident detection model with the California algorithm, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 128(1), 21-30.
14. Klir, G. J. & Yuan, B. (1995), Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ .
15. Lajnef, N., Rhimi, M., Mhamdi, L., Chatti, K. & Faridazar, F. (2011), Toward a smart, long-term pavement monitoring system, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 26(7), 513-23.
16. Lee, D. E., Lim, T. K. & Arditi, D. (2011), An expert system for auditing quality management systems in construction, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 26(8), 612-31.
17. Li, Z., Madanu, S., Wang, Y. Abbas, M. & Zhou, B. (2010), A heuristic approach for selecting highway investment alternatives, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25(6), 427-39.
18. Loizos, A. & Karlaftis, A. (2006), Investigating pavement cracking: an evolutionary modular neural network approach, in National Research Council (ed.), Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1970, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC, pp. 207-14.
19. Marano, G. C., Quaranta, G. & Monti, G. (2011), Modified genetic algorithm for the dynamic identification of structural systems using incomplete measurements, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 26(2), 92-110.
20. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) (2006), An Overview of Mn/DOT's Pavement Condition Rating Procedures and Indices, http://www.dot.state.mn.us/materials/pvmtmgmtdocs/Rating_Overview_State.pdf, accessed November 2, 2010.
21. New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT) (2004), The New Mexico Department of Transportation's Network Level Pavement Management Program, http://nmshtd.state.nm.us/upload/images/ITIS/Pavement-Management.pdf, accessed November 15, 2009.
22. Nguyen, H. T. & Walker, E. A. (2000), A First Course in Fuzzy Logic, 2nd edn, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
23. Ong, G. P., Noureldin, S. & Sinha, K. C. (2009), A methodology to evaluate quality of pavement surface distress data collected from automated techniques, inProceedings of the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC.
24. Peng, F., Kang, S., Li, X. & Ouyang, Y. (2011), A heuristic approach to railroad track maintenance scheduling problem, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 26(2), 129-45.
25. Provenzano, P. (2003), A fuzzy neural network method for modeling uncertainties insoil-structure interaction problem, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 18, 391-411.
26. Rada, G. R., Wu, C. L., Bhandari, R. K., Shekharan, A. R., Elkins, G. E. & Miller, J. S. (1999), Study of LTPP distress data variability. Vol. 1, Rep. No. FHWA-RD-99-074, Office of Infrastructure Research and Development, FHWA, McLean, VA .
27. Roberts, C. & Attoh-Okine, N. O. (1998), A comparative analysis of two artificial neural networks using pavement performance prediction, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 13, 339-48.
28. Ross, T. (2004), Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ .
29. Saltan, M., Tigdemir, M. & Karasahin, M. (2002), Artificial neural network application for flexible pavement thickness modeling, Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Science, 26, 246-48.
30. Samant, A. & Adeli, H. (2001), Enhancing neural network incident detection algorithms using wavelets, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 16(4), 239-45.
31. Sarma, K. C. & Adeli, H. (2000a), Fuzzy discrete multicriteria cost optimization of steel structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, 126, 1339-47.
32. Sarma, K. C. & Adeli, H. (2000b), Fuzzy genetic algorithm for optimization of steel structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(5), 596-604.
33. Sarma, K. C. & Adeli, H. (2002), Life-cycle cost optimization of steel structures, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 55(12), 1451-62.
34. Schmucker, K. J. (1984), Fuzzy Sets, Natural Language Computation, and Risk Analysis, Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD .
35. Selezneva, O., Mladenovic, G., Speir, R., Amenta, J. & Kennedy, J. (2004), QA sampling considerations for automated distress data collection and processing for National Park Service road inventory program, in Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
36. Shahin, M. Y. (1994), Pavement Management for Airports, Roads and Parking Lots, Chapman and Hall, NY .
37. Shoukry, S. N., Martinelli, D. R. & Reigle, J. A. (1997), Universal pavement distress evaluator based on fuzzy sets, in National Research Council (ed.), Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1592, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC, pp. 180-86.
38. Stoeffels, S., Morian, D., Firth, D. J. & Larson, C. D. (2001), Quality analysis methods for pavement distress data, in Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
39. Tighe, S. L. Ningyuan, L. & Kazmierowski, T. (2008), Evaluation of semi-automated and automated pavement distress collection for network-level pavement management, in National Research Council (ed.), Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2084, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC, pp. 11-17.
40. Wang, K. C. P. & Li, Q. (2011), Pavement smoothness prediction based on fuzzy and gray theories, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 26(1), 69-76.
41. Wee, S. & Kim, N. (2006), Angular fuzzy logic application for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation strategy in Ohio, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 10(2), 81-9.
42. Yang, J., Lu, J. J., Gunaratne, M. & Xiang, Q. (2003), Forecasting overall pavement condition with neural networks-application on Florida highway network, in National Research Council (ed.), Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1853, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC, pp. 3-12.
43. Zhang, Z., Singh, N. & Hudson, W. R. (1997), Comprehensive ranking index for flexible pavement using fuzzy sets model, in National Research Council (ed.), Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1397, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC, pp. 96-102.