Testing QoE in different 3D HDTV technologies

Radioengineering

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 445-454

  Slanina, Martin ^a   Kratochvíl, Tomáš ^a   Říčný, Václav ^a   Boleček, Libor ^a   Kaller, Ondřej ^a   Polák, Ladislav ^a  

^a BRNO UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

3D; Quality of Experience; Reference free methodology; stereoscopic display; Subjective test

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864835852     PISSN: 12102512     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. REICHL, P., FABINI, J., HAPPENHOFER, M., EGGER, C. From QoS to QoX: A charging perspective. In Proceedings of the 18th ITC Specialist Seminar on Quality of Experience. Karlskrona (Sweden): Blekinge Insitute of Technology, 2008, p. 35 - 44.
2. ITU-T Recommendation P.10/G.100 (incl. Amendment 2). Vocabulary for performance and quality of service. July 2006 (2008).
3. ETSI TR 102 643 v. 1.0.1. Human factors (HF); Quality of Experience requirements for real-time communication services. 2009.
4. ITU-R Recommendation BT.500-11. Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures.Geneva:ITU, 2002.
5. ITU-T Recommendation P.910. Subjective Video Quality Assessment Methods for Multimedia Applications. Geneva: ITU, 2008.
6. ITU-R Recommendation BT.1788 Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of Video Quality in Multimedia Applications. Geneva: ITU, 2007.
7. th International Packet Video Workshop. Hong Kong (China), 2010, p. 193 - 200.
8. UMAR, A. S., SWASH, R. M., SADKA, A. H. Subjective assessment of 3D videos. In Africon 2011, Livingstone (Zambia), 2011, p. 1-6.
9. XING, L., YOU, J., EBRAHIMI, T., PERKIS, A. Estimating quality of experience on stereoscopic images. In International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems ISPACS 2010. Cheng Du (China), 2010.
10. BULAT, J., JANOWSKI, L., JUZSKA, D., SOCHA, M., GREGA, M., PAPIR, Z. Evaluation of crosstalk metrics for 3D display technologies with respect to temporal luminance analysis. In IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, ISM 2011. Dana Point (CA, USA), 2011, p. 512-517.
11. QUAN HUYNH-THU, BARKOWSKY, M., LE CALLET, P. The importance of visual attention in improving the 3D-TV viewing experience: Overview and new perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 2011, vol. 57, no. 2, p. 421-431.
12. th Conference on Image Processing. Hong Kong (China), 2010, p. 4025 - 4028.
13. ITU, Switzerland. ITU-T Work Programme [Online] 2012. [Cited 2012-02 14] Available at: http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/workprog/wp_search.aspx?isn_sp=545&isn_sg=549
14. SLANINA, M., KRATOCHVIL, T., POLAK, L., RICNY, V. Analysis of temporal effects in quality assessment of high definition video. Radioengineering, 2012, vol. 21, no. 1.
15. STAELENS, N., et al. Assessing Quality of Experience of IPTV and video on demand services in real-life environments. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 2010, vol. 56, no. 4, p. 458 - 466.
16. TULLIS, T., ALBERT, B. Measuring the User Experience; Collecting, Analyzing and Presenting Usablility Metrics. Burlington (MA, USA): Morgan Kaufmann, 2008.
17. KLIMA, M. et al. DEIMOS - an open source image database. Radioengineering, 2011, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 1016 - 1023.
18. KNAZEVIC, A. Overlapping confidence intervals and statistical significance. StatNews #73. Ithaca (NY, USA): Cornell University, 2008. [Online] Cited 2011-03-10. Available at: http://www.cscu.cornell.edu/news/statnews/stnews73.pdf.