Non-traditional dual earners in Norway: When does she work at least as much as he?

Work, Employment and Society

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 657-675

  Kitterød, Ragni Hege ^a   Rønsen, Marit ^a  

^a STATISTICS NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

dual earner couples; female labour supply; gender equality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864812799     PISSN: 09500170     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0950017012445090     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abrahamsen BHeltid eller deltid? Kvinners arbeidstid i kvinnedominerte og mannsdominerte yrker. Oslo: Institutt for samfunnsforskning; 2002:.
2. Anker RGender and Jobs: Sex Segregation of Occupations in the World. Geneva: International Labour Office (ILO); 1998:.
3. Becker GA Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1991:.
4. Bittman M,England P,Folbre N,Sayer L,Matheson G.When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work.American Journal of Sociology. 2003;109 (1): 186-214.
5. Bø I.Equal gender opportunity: couples in the gap between principles and practice.Community, Work and Family. 2008;11 (4): 439-55.
6. Bø TP,Kitterød RH,Køber T,Nerland SM,Skoglund TArbeidstiden - mønstre og utviklingstrekk. Oslo: Statistics Norway; 2008:.
7. Brandt B,Kvande KFleksible fedre: maskulinitet, arbeid, fleksibilitet. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2003:.
8. Coltrane S.Research on household labor: modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work.Journal of Marriage and the Family. 2000;62 (4): 1208-33.
9. Dermott E.What's parenthood got to do with it? Men's hours of paid work.The British Journal of Sociology. 2006;54 (4): 619-34.
10. Dommermuth L,Kitterød RH.Fathers' employment in a father-friendly welfare state. Does fatherhood affect men's working hours?.Community, Work and Family. 2009;12 (4): 417-36.
11. Ellingsæter ALNye kvinner, nye menn. Haukaa R, ed. Oslo: Ad Notam; 1991:143-63.
12. Ellingsæter ALRestructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of The Male Breadwinner. Crompton R, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999:40-59.
13. Ellingsæter AL.The complexity of family policy reform: the case of Norway.European Societies. 2003;5 (4): 419-43.
14. Politicising Parenthoood in Scandinavia: Gender Relations in Welfare States. Ellingsæter ALLeira A, ed. Bristol: The Polity Press; 2006:.
15. Esping-Andersen GSocial Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999:.
16. Eurostat (2010) Eurostat Yearbook 2010. Avaiable (consulted 24 March 2012) at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-CD-10-220/EN/KS-CD-10-220-EN.PDF.
17. Ferree MM.The gender division of labour in two-earner marriages.Journal of Family Issues. 1991;12 (2): 158-80.
18. Folbre N.Hearts and spades: paradigms of household economics.World Development. 1986;14 (2): 245-55.
19. Gornick C,Meyers KFamilies That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation; 2003:.
20. Gupta ND,Smith N,Verner M.De økonomiske effekter af familievenlig politik i de nordiske lande.Søkelys på arbeidslivet. 2008;25 (1): 143-51.
21. Haas B,Steiber N,Hartel M,Wallace C.Household employment patterns in an enlarged European Union.Work, Employment and Society. 2006;20 (4): 751-71.
22. Halrynjo S,Lyng S.Preferences, constraints or schemas of devotion? Exploring Norwegian mothers' withdrawal from high-commitment careers.The British Journal of Sociology. 2009;60 (2): 321-43.
23. Kitterød RHArbeidslivets klemmer. Paradokser i det nye arbeidslivet. Kvande ERasmussen B, ed. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget; 2007:291-309.
24. Kitterød RH,Rønsen MUntraditional Couples in a Neo-Traditional Setting: Which Women Perform as Much Paid Work as Their Partner?. Oslo: Statistics Norway; 2010:.
25. Utradisjonell likestilling? Analyser av undersøkelsen Livsløp, generasjon og kjønn (LOGG) 2007. Kjeldstad RLyngstad J, ed. Oslo: Statistics Norway; 2010:.
26. Kjeldstad R,Nymoen EHPart-Time Work, Underemployment and Gender: Worker versus Job Explanations. Oslo: Statistics Norway; 2009:.
27. Knudsen K,Wærness K.National context, individual characteristics and attitudes on mothers's employment: a comparative analysis of Great Britain, Sweden and Norway.Acta Sociologica. 2001;44 (1): 67-79.
28. Life-Course, Generation and Gender: LOGG 2007. Field Report of the Norwegian Generations and Gender Survey. Lappegård TVeenstra M, ed. Oslo: Statistics Norway; 2010:.
29. Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD; 2000:.
30. Raley SB,Mattingly MJ,Bianchi SM.How dual are dual income couples? Documenting change from 1970 to 2001.Journal of Marriage and Family. 2006;68:11-28.
31. Rantalaiho MKvoter, valgfrihet og fleksibilitet. Indre spenninger i den nordiske familiepolitikken. Oslo: NIKK; 2009:.
32. Rusconi A,Solga HA Systematic Reflection upon Dual Career Couples. Germany: Social Science Research Centre Berlin (WZB); 2008:.
33. Skrede KVelferdsstaten og familien. Utfordringer og dilemmaer. Ellingsæter ALLeira A, ed. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2004:160-200.
34. Smith M.Dual earning in Europe: time and occupational equity.Work, Employment and Society. 2005;19 (1): 131-9.
35. Statistics Norway (2012a) Education Statistics 2010. Available (consulted 26 March 2012) at: http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/04/01/utniv_en/arkiv/tab-2010-06-25-03-en.html.
36. Statistics Norway (2012b) Labour Force Survey 2011. Available (consulted 26 March 2012) at: http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/06/01/aku_en/tab-2012-02-01-03-en.html.
37. Statistics Norway (2012c) Labour Force Survey 2011. Available (consulted 26March2012) at: http://statbank.ssb.no//statistikkbanken/default_fr.asp?PLanguage=1.
38. Vaage OFTid alle døgnets tider. Tidsbruk 1971-2000. Oslo: Statistics Norway; 2002:.
39. Verbakel E,De Graaf PM.Partner effects on labour market participation and job level: opposing mechanisms.Work, Employment and Society. 2009;23 (4): 635-54.
40. West C,Zimmerman D.Doing gender.Gender and Society. 1987;1 (2): 125-51.
41. Winkler AE,McBride TD,Andrews C.Wives who outearn their husbands: a transitory or persistent phenomenon for couples?.Demography. 2005;42 (3): 523-35.