Techno-economic and environmental risk analysis for advanced marine propulsion systems

Applied Energy

Volumn 99, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-12

  Doulgeris, G ^a   Korakianitis, T ^b   Pilidis, P ^a   Tsoudis, E ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Saint Louis University School of Science and Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic; Environmental; Gas turbine; Marine; Propulsion; Techno economic

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON MONOXIDE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; ELECTRIC PROPULSION; GAS TURBINES; HYDROCARBONS; LIFE CYCLE; MACHINE DESIGN; MARINE ENGINES; NITRIC OXIDE; PROPULSION; SHIP PROPULSION; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

CYCLE OPERATION; EARNING CAPACITY; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES; ECONOMIC MODELS; ENGINE LIFE; ENGINE PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ANALYSIS; EXHAUST EMISSION; FAST FERRIES; INTEGRATED FULL ELECTRIC PROPULSIONS; MAINTENANCE COST; MARINE; MARINE GAS TURBINES; MARINE PROPULSION SYSTEMS; MARINE VESSELS; NET PRESENT COST; OPERATING ENVIRONMENT; OPERATING LIFE; OPERATIONAL PROFILE; PREDICTION METHODS; PRIME MOVERS; PROPULSION SYSTEM; SHIP PERFORMANCE; STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS; SYSTEM-OF-SYSTEMS; SYSTEMIC ANALYSIS; TECHNO-ECONOMICS; UNBURNED HYDROCARBONS;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; LIFE CYCLE; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; OXIDE; STOCHASTICITY; TURBINE; VESSEL;

EID: 84864805503     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.026     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Annex13. Amendments to the annex of the protocol of 1997 to amend the international convention for the prevention of pollution from ships as modified by the protocol of 1978 relating thereto. Resolution MEPC.176(58), MEPC 58/23/Add.1; October 2008.
2. Skjolsvik K.O., Andersen A.B., Corbett J., Skjelvik J. Study of greenhouse gas emissions from ships. Int Maritime Org 2000, (2).
3. Buhaug O et al. Second imo ghg study 2009. International Maritime Organisation, London; April 2009.
4. Korakianitis T., Wilson D.G. Low-pressure-ratio, regenerative, Brayton-cycle engines: the next generation of marine prime movers?. Trans Inst Marine Eng (I Mar E UK) 1987, 99(1):1-18.
5. Korakianitis T. On marine gas turbines: cycle-parameter choices and shaft-arrangement effects on performance. Trans Inst Marine Eng (I Mar E UK) 1992, 104(6):187-201.
6. Korakianitis T., Wilson D.G. Models for predicting the performance of Brayton-cycle engines. J Eng Gas Turb Power, Trans ASME 1994, 116(2):381-388.
7. Korakianitis T., Beier K.J. Investigation of the part-load performance of two 11.2 MW regenerative marine gas turbines. J Eng Gas Turb Power, Trans ASME 1994, 116(2):418-423.
8. Arai M, Sugimoto T, Imai K, Miyaji H, Nakanishi K, Hamachi Y. Research and development of gas turbine for next-generation marine propulsion system (super marine gas turbine). IGTC 2003 Tokyo, OS202; 2003.
9. Korakianitis T., Svensson K. Off-design performance of various gas-turbine cycle and shaft configurations. J Eng Gas Turb Power, Trans ASME 1999, 121(4):649-655.
10. Colin R. The WR-21 intercooled recuperated gas turbine engine - integration into future warships. IGTC2003, Tokyo, OS-203; 2003.
11. Bretschneider S, Arago O, Staudacher S. Architecture of a techno-economic and environmental risk assessment tool using a multi-modular build approach. In: ISABE 2007 proceedings, Paper No. ISABE-2007-1103; 2007.
12. Ogaji S, Pilidis P, Sethi V. Advanced power plant selection: the TERA (techno-economic environmental risk analysis) framework. In: ISABE 2009 proceedings, ISABE-2009-1115; 2009.
13. Kyprianidis K., Gronstedt T., Ogaji S., Pilidis P., Singh R. Assessment of future aero-engine designs with intrecooled and intercooled recuperated cores. J Eng Gas Turb Power 2011, 133. 10.1115/1.400198.
14. Holtrop J., Mennen G.G.J. An approximate power prediction method. Int Ship Build Prog 1982, 29.
15. Holtrop J. A statistical re-analysis of resistance and propulsion data. Int Ship Build Prog 1984, 31.
16. Hydrocomb. Applicability range of holtrop-1984 method. Hydrocomp technical report; 1999.
17. Oosterveld M., van Oossanen P. Further computer analysed data of the Wageningen B-screw series. Int Ship Build Prog 1975.
18. Lamb T. Ship design and construction vol. ii. SNAME, ISBN No. 0-939773-41-4, chapter 38; 2003. p. 19.
19. Hugel MA. An evaluation of propulsors for several navy ships. MSc thesis, Massachusetts Institue of Technology, USA; 1993.
20. MacMillan WL. Development of a modular type computer program for the calculation of gas turbine off design performance. Doctoral dissertation, School of Mechanical Engineering, Cranfield Institue of Technology, Cranfield, UK; September 1974.
21. Palmer JR. The turbocode scheme for the programming of the thermodynamic cycle calculations on an electronic digital computer. COA/AERO-198; 1967.
22. Walsh P.P., Fletcher P. Gas turbine performance 2004, Blackwell Publishing.
23. Van den Hout F. Gas turbine performance simulation improvements to the turbomatch scheme. MSc thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK; 1991.
24. Sirinoglou A. Implementation of variable geometry for gas turbine performance simulation turbomatch improvement. MSc thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK; 1992.
25. Ulizar I., Pilidis P. Predicted performance characteristics of a variable cycle turbofan. Aeronaut J 1997, 101(1006):263-268.
26. Aleid L., Pilidis P. Variable cycle jet engines for a Mach 2.7 supersonic civil transport. Aeronaut J 1997, 102(1011):31-36.
27. Gomes E., do Nacimento M., Lora E., Pilidis P., Haslam A. Performance evaluation and case studies of microturbines fueled with natural gas and diesel. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A: J Power Energy 2004, 218(8):599-607.
28. Lewis E. Principles of naval architecture. Motion in waves and controllability, vol. III. SNAME, ISBN No. 0-939773-02-3; 1988. p. 118-21.
29. Schneekluth H., Bertram V. Ship design for efficiency and economy 1998, Butterworth-Heinemann, UK.
30. Bowden BS, Davison NJ. Resistance increments due to hull roughness associated with form factor extrapolation methods. N.M.I. Ship, TM 3800; 1974.
31. Lefebvre A.H. Gas turbine combustion 1998, Taylor and Francis. 2nd ed.
32. Badeer GH. GE aeroderivative gas turbines-design and operating features. GE power systems, Ref: GER-3695E; 2000.
33. ICAO. ICAO engine emissions databank. Issue 15; 2007.
34. Shanghi V., Kishore Kumar S., Sundararajan V. Preliminary estimation of engine gas-flow-path size and weight. J Propul Power 1998, 14(2):208-214.
35. Torres G. Gas turbine hot section life usage considerations. MSc thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK; 1987.
36. Roskam J. Airplane design part VIII; airplane cost estimation: design, development, manufacturing and operating. Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation, ISBN No: 1-8848-8555-1; 1990. p. 85-102.
37. Lewis E. Principles of naval architecture. Resistance, propulsion and vibration, vol. II. SNAME, ISBN No. 0-939773-01-5; 1988. p. 66-93.
38. [accessed in September 2008 and March 2012]; 2012. http://www.ship-technology.com/projects/superfast/.
39. Grigoropoulos GJ, Harries S, Damala DP, Birk L, Heimann J. Seakeeping assessment for high-speed monohulls-a comparative study. IMDC-2003, Athens; 2003.
40. [accessed in September 2008 and March 2012]; 2012. http://www.ship-technology.com/projects/bluestar/.
41. [accessed in September 2008 and March 2012]; 2012. http://www.ship-technology.com/projects/rotter/.
42. [accessed in September 2008 and March 2012]; 2012. http://www.ship-technology.com/projects/nilsholgersson/.
43. Gaisma. Gaisma(website); 2008. [accessed October 2008]. http://www.gaisma.com/en/location/athens.
44. Huld A., Marcel S., Dunlop D., Micale F. Estimating average daytime and daily temperature profiles within europe. Environ Model Software 2006, 21:1650-1661.