Learning, training, and development in organizations: Much progress and a peek over the horizon

Learning, Training, and Development in Organizations

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 461-476

  Salas, Eduardo ^a   Kozlowski, Steve W J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864805185     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203878385     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Bell, B. S., Kanar, A. M., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008). Current issues and future directions in simulation-based training in North America. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 1416-1434.
3. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). Adaptive guidance: Enhancing self-regulation, knowledge and performance in technology-based training. Personnel Psychology, 55, 267-306.
4. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008). Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 296-316.
5. Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678-707.
6. Gluck, K. A., & Pew, R. W. (2005). Modeling human behavior with integrated cognitive architectures: Comparison, evaluation, and validation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Goldstein, I. L. (1989). Training and development in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Howell, W. C., & Cooke, N. J. (1989). Training the human information processor: A review of cognitive models. In I. L. Goldstein (Ed.), Training and development in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, 13(3-9), 21-26.
10. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Brown, K. G., Weissbein, D., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2000). A multilevel approach to training effectiveness: Enhancing horizontal and vertical transfer. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 157-210). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Salas, E. (1997). An organizational systems approach for the implementation and transfer of training. In J. K. Ford, S. W. J. Kozlowski, K. Kraiger, E. Salas, & M. Teachout (Eds.), Improving training effectiveness in work organizations (pp. 247-287). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Toney, R. J., Mullins, M. E., Weissbein, D. A., Brown, K. G., & Bell, B. S. (2001). Developing adaptability: A theory for the design of integrated-embedded training systems. In E. Salas, (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research (Vol. 1, pp. 59-123). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
14. Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 311-328.
15. Parasuraman, R., & Wilson, G. F. (2008). Putting the brain to work: Neuroergonomics past, present and future. Human Factors, 50(3), 468-474.
16. Pew, R. W., & Mavor, A. S. (1997). Representing human behavior in military simulations: Interim report. Report from Panel on Modeling Human Behavior and Command Decision Making: Representations for Military Simulations. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
17. Posner, M. I., & DiGirolamo, G. J. (2000). Cognitive neuroscience: Origins and promise. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 873-889.
18. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471-499.
19. Salas, E., Wilson, K. A., Priest, H. A., & Guthrie, J. W. (2006). Design, delivery, and evaluation of training systems. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics ( 3rd ed., pp. 472-512). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
20. Shute, V. J., & Psotka, J. (1996). Intelligent tutoring systems: Past, present and future. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 570-600). New York: Macmillan.
21. Sugrue, B., & Clark, R. F. (2000). Media selection for training. In S. Tobias & J. D. Hetcher (Eds.), Training and retraining: A handbook for business, industry, government, and the military (pp. 208-234). New York: Macmillan.
22. Tannenbaum, S. I., & Yukl, G. (1992). Training and development in work organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 399-441.
23. Wilson, K. A., Bedwell, W. L., Lazzara, E. H., Salas, E., Burke, C. S., Estock, J., Orvis, K. L., & Conkey, C. (2009). Relations between game attributes and learning outcomes: Review and research proposals. Simulation and Gaming, 40, 217-266.
24. Zachary, W., Bell, B., & Ryder, J. (2008). Computational representations and method for modeling teams. In E. Salas, G. F. Goodwin, & C. S. Burke (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations (pp. 455-481). New York: Taylor & Francis.
25. Zachary, W., Bell, B., & Ryder, J. (2008). Computational representations and method for modeling teams. In E. Salas, G. F. Goodwin, & C. S. Burke (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations (pp. 455-481). New York: Taylor & Francis.