Invisible design: Exploring insights and ideas through ambiguous film scenarios

Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS '12

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 534-543

  Briggs, Pam ^a   Blythe, Mark ^a   Vines, John ^b   Lindsay, Stephen ^b   Dunphy, Paul ^b   Nicholson, James ^a   Green, David ^b   Kitson, Jim ^b   Monk, Andrew ^c   Olivier, Patrick ^b  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

film; invisible design; older adults; participatory design

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN APPROACHES; EXISTING PROBLEMS; OLDER ADULTS; PARTICIPATORY DESIGN; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS;

BIOMETRICS; FILMS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84864780278     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2317956.2318036     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Aoki P. M. and Woodruff. A. Making space for stories: Ambiguity in the design of personal communication systems. In: Proc. CHI '05, ACM (2005), 181-190.
2. Bardzell, J and Bardzell, S. Pleasure is your birthright: Digitally enabled designer sex toys as a case of third-wave HCI. In: Proc. CHI '11, ACM (2011), 257-266
3. Blythe, M., and Wright, P. Pastiche scenarios: Fiction as a resource for user centred design. Interacting with Computers, 18 (5), Elsevier Science (2006), 1139-1164.
4. Blythe M., and Dearden, A. 2008. Representing older people: towards meaningful images of the user in design scenarios. Universal Access in the Information Society, 8 (1), (2009), 21-32.
5. Boehner K. and Hancock J. T. 2006. Advancing ambiguity. In: Proc. CHI '06, ACM (2006), 103-106.
6. Brereton, M. and McGarry, B. An Observational Study of How Objects Support Engineering Design Thinking and Communication: Implications for the design of tangible media. In: Proc. CHI '00, ACM Press (2000), 217-224.
7. Briggs, P., Olivier, P. Biometric daemons: authentication via electronic pets. In: Proc. CHI EA '08, ACM (2008), 2423-2432.
8. Briggs, P., Olivier, P. Kitson, J. Film as Invisible Design: The Example of the Biometric Daemon. In: Proc. CHI EA '09, ACM (2009), 3511-3512.
9. Bruce-Briggs, B. Supergenius: the Mega Worlds of Herman Kahn, North American Policy Press, NewYork, 2001.
10. Carroll, J. Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development. Wiley, New York, 1995.
11. Carroll, J. Making use: Scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2000.
12. Charmaz, K. Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage, London, 2006.
13. Coleman, G., Gibson, L., Hanson, V., Bobrowicz, A., McKay, A. Engaging the disengaged: how do we design technology for digitally excluded older adults? In Proc. DIS '10, ACM Press (2010), 175-178.
14. Cook P. Tragically I Was an Only Twin: The Complete Peter Cook. Random House. UK, 2001.
15. Cooper, A. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum. SAMS Publishing, Indianapolis, 1999.
16. Easthope A. and McGowan K. (1992) A Critical and Cultural Theory Reader. Open University Press. Buckingham UK
17. Gaver, W. Beaver J., and Benford S. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In: Proc. CHI '03. ACM (2003), 233-240.
18. Go, K. and Carroll, J.M. The blind men and the elephant: Views of scenario-based system design. Interactions, 11 (6), ACM (2004), 44-53.
19. Goel, V. Cognitive role of ill-structured representations in preliminary design. In: Proc. Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design (MIT Press, 1999), 131-145.
20. Harrington C. Ghoulies and Ghosts. In: Silver A. and Ursini J. (eds) Horror Film Reader. Limelight editions, New York, 2000.
21. Kensing, F., and Blomberg, J. Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7, 167-185.
22. Light, A., Briggs, P., Martin, K. Seeding without leading: Making space for participant contribution In design elicitation techniques. In Proc. BCS-HCI '08, British Computer Society (2008), 159-161.
23. Mancini, C., Rogers, Y., Bandara, A.K., Coe, T., Jedrzejczyk, L., Joinson, A.N., Price, B.A., Thomas, K., and Nuseibeh, B. Contravision: exploring users' reactions to futuristic technology. In: Proc. CHI '10, ACM (2010), 153-162.
24. Newell, A., Carmichael, A., Morgan, M., Dickinson, A. The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies. Interacting with Computers, 18, Elsevier Science (2006), 996-1011.
25. Newell, A., Morgan, M. Gregor, P. Charmichael, A. Theatre as an intermediary between users and CHI designers. In Proc. CHI EA '06. ACM (2006), 111-116.
26. Pruitt, J., and Grudin, J. Personas: Practice and theory. In: Proc. DUX '03, ACM Press (2003), 1-15.
27. Raijmakers, B., Gaver, W., Bishay, J. Design documentaries: inspiring design research through documentary film. In Proc. DIS '05, ACM (2006), 229-238.
28. Read, J.C., Fitton, D. and Mazzone, E. Using obstructed theatre with child designers to convey requirements. In: Proc. CHI EA '10, ACM (2010), 4063-4068.
29. Sengers P., and Gaver, B. Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In: Proc. DIS '06, ACM (2006), 99-108
30. Triantafyllakos, G., Palaigeorgiou, G., and Tsoukalas, I. Design alter egos: Constructing and employing fictional characters in collaborative design sessions. In: Proc. BCS-HCI 2009, British Computer Society (2009), 20-28.
31. Truffaut F. Hitchcock: Revised Edition. Simon and Schuster, New York, 1983.
32. Tversky, B. What do Sketches Say about Thinking? 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium, Sketch Understanding Workshop, Stanford University, AAAI Technical Report SS-02-08, 2002, 148-151.
33. Vines, J., Blythe, M., Dunphy, P., Vlachokyriakos, V., Teece, I., Monk, A., Olivier, P. Cheque Mates: Participatory Design of Digital Payments with Eighty Somethings. In: Proc. CHI '12, ACM Press (2012).
34. Vines, J., Dunphy, P., Blythe, M., Lindsay, S., Monk, A., Olivier, P. The Joy of Cheques: Trust, Paper and Eighty Somethings. In: Proc. CSCW '12, ACM Press (2012), 147-156.