A Note on the Derivation of Epidemic Final Sizes

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Volumn 74, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 2125-2141

  Miller, Joel C ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Epidemics; Final size relation; SIR

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864775325     PISSN: 00928240     EISSN: 15229602     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-012-9749-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Andreasen, V. (2003). Dynamics of annual influenza A epidemics with immuno-selection. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 46, 504-536.
2. Andreasen, V. (2011). The final size of an epidemic and its relation to the basic reproduction number. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 73(10), 2305-2321.
3. Arino, J., Brauer, F., van den Driessche, P., Watmough, J., & Wu, J. (2007). A final size relation for epidemic models. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 4(2), 159.
4. Ball, F., & Clancy, D. (1995). The final outcome of an epidemic model with several different types of infective in a large population. Journal of Applied Probability, 32, 579-590.
5. Bollobás, B., Janson, S., & Riordan, O. (2007). The phase transition in inhomogeneous random graphs. Random Structures & Algorithms, 31(1), 3.
6. Brauer, F. (2008). Age-of-infection and the final size relation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 5(4), 681.
7. Britton, T., Deijfen, M., & Martin-Löf, A. (2006). Generating simple random graphs with prescribed degree distribution. Journal of Statistical Physics, 124(6), 1377-1397.
8. Chung, F., & Lu, L. (2002). Connected components in random graphs with given expected degree sequences. Annals of Combinatorics, 6(2), 125-145.
9. Diekmann, O., & Heesterbeek, J. A. P. (2000). Mathematical epidemiology of infectious diseases. Chichester: Wiley.
10. 0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 28, 365-382.
11. Feld, S. L. (1991). Why your friends have more friends than you do. American Journal of Sociology, 96(6), 1464-1477.
12. van der Hofstad, R. (2012). Critical behavior in inhomogeneous random graphs. Random Struct. Algorithms. To be published arXiv: 0902. 0216v2 [math. PR].
13. Katriel, G. (2012). The size of epidemics in populations with heterogeneous susceptibility. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 65(2), 237-262. doi: 10. 1007/s00285-011-0460-2.
14. Kenah, E., & Robins, J. M. (2007). Second look at the spread of epidemics on networks. Physical Review E, 76(3), 036113.
15. Kermack, W. O., & McKendrick, A. G. (1927). A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 115, 700-721.
16. Ma, J. J., & Earn, D. J. D. (2006). Generality of the final size formula for an epidemic of a newly invading infectious disease. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 68(3), 679-702.
17. Meester, R., & Trapman, P. (2011). Bounding basic characteristics of spatial epidemics with a new percolation model. Advances in Applied Probability, 43(2), 335-347.
18. Miller, J. C. (2007). Epidemic size and probability in populations with heterogeneous infectivity and susceptibility. Physical Review E, 76(1), 010101(R).
19. Miller, J. C. (2008). Bounding the size and probability of epidemics on networks. Journal of Applied Probability, 45, 498-512.
20. Miller, J. C., Slim, A. C., & Volz, E. M. (2012). Edge-based compartmental modelling for infectious disease spread. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 9(70), 890-906.
21. Molloy, M., & Reed, B. (1995). A critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence. Random Structures & Algorithms, 6(2), 161-179.
22. Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45, 167-256.
23. Norros, I., & Reittu, H. (2006). On a conditionally Poissonian graph process. Advances in Applied Probability, 38(1), 59-75.