Ontology-driven generation of multi-view modeling tools

Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering, SE 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 45-51

  Kusel, Angelika ^a   Mitsch, Stefan ^a   Retschitzegger, Werner ^a   Schwinger, Wieland ^a   Mayr, Ralph ^b   Schönböck, Johannes ^c  

^a JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES UPPER AUSTRIA   (Austria)

^c VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

EMF; GMF; Multi view modeling; Ontology; Tool generation; Xtext

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; GMF; LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION; MODELING TOOL; MULTI-VIEW MODELING; TOOL GENERATION; XTEXT;

ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; ONTOLOGY;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84864773482     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2316/P.2012.780-007     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Colin Atkinson, Matthias Gutheil, and Kilian Kiko. On the relationship of ontologies and models. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Meta-Modeling and Ontologies, pages 47-60. Gesellschaft für Informatik, 2006.
2. Sidi Benslimane, Mimoun Malki, and Djelloul Bouchiha. Deriving conceptual schema from domain ontology: A web application reverse engineering approach. International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 7(2):167-176, 2010.
3. Stephen Cranefield. Networked knowledge representation and exchange using uml and rdf. Journal of Digital Information, 1, 2001.
4. Stephen Cranefield and Jin Pan. Bridging the gap between the model-driven architecture and ontology engineering. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(7):595-609, 2007.
5. Sven Efftinge. openArchitectureWare 4.1: Check Validation Language. http://www.openarchitectureware.org/pub/documentation/4.1/r30-checkReference. pdf, 2006.
6. Kateryna Falkovych, Marta Sabou, and Heiner Stuckenschmidt. Knowledge Transformation for the Semantic Web, chapter UML for the semantic web: Transformation-based approaches, pages 92-103. IOS Press, 2003.
7. Matthias Ferdinand, Christian Zirpins, and David Trastour. Lifting xml schema to owl. In International Conference on Web Engineering. Springer, 2004.
8. Dragan Gasevic, Dragan Djuric, and Vladan Devedzic. Model Driven Engineering and Ontology Development. Springer, 2006.
9. H. J. Happel and S. Seedorf. Applications of ontologies in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Web Enabled Software Engineering, Athens, USA, November 2006.
10. Gerti Kappel, Elisabeth Kapsammer, Horst Kargl, Gerhard Kramler, Thomas Reiter, Werner Retschitzegger, Wieland Schwinger, and Manuel Wimmer. Lifting metamodels to ontologies: A step to the semantic integration of modeling languages. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS/UML 2006), pages 528-542, Genova, Italy, October 2006. Springer.
11. Kilian Kiko and Colin Atkinson. A detailed comparison of UML and OWL. Technical Report TR-2008-004, University of Mannheim, Fakultät für Mathematik und Informatik, Lehrstuhl für Softwaretechnik, 2008.
12. P. J. Mosterman and H. Vangheluwe. Special issue on computer automated multi-paradigm modeling. TOMACS Journal, (4):249-255, 2002.
13. OMG. Meta object facility (mof) specification. Object Modeling Group, 2000.
14. OMG. Ontology definition metamodel. Object Management Groupe, 2005.
15. Fernando Silva Parreiras and Steffen Staab. Using ontologies with uml class-based modeling: The twouse approach. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 2010.
16. Thomas Stahl and Markus Völter. Modellgetriebene Softwareentwicklung: Techniken, Engineering, Management. asdf, 2005.
17. Robert Tairas, Marjan Mernik, and Jeff Gray. Using ontologies in the domain analysis of domain-specific languages. In Models in Software Engineering: Workshops and Symposia at MODELS 2008, Transforming and Weaving Ontologies and Model Driven Engineering, pages 332-342. Springer, 2009.
18. Olegas Vasilecas, Diana Bugaite, and Justas Trinkunas. On approach for enterprise ontology transformation into conceptual model. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, 2006.
19. Raphael Volz, Daniel Oberle, Steffen Staab, and Rudi Studer. Ontolift prototype, ist project 2001-33052 wonderweb, deliverable 11. http://wonderweb.semanticweb.org/deliverables/documents/D11.pdf, 2003.
20. W3C. Owl 2 web ontology language. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/, 2009.
21. Tobias Walter and Jürgen Ebert. Combining dsls and ontologies using metamodel integration. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC 2 Working Conference on Domain Specific Languages, pages 148-169, Oxford, UK, July 2009. Springer.
22. Tobias Walter, Fernando Silva Parreiras, and Steffen Staab. Ontodsl: An ontology-based framework for domain-specific languages. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, pages 408-422, Denver, CO, USA, 2009. Springer.
23. Wei Xu, Arta Dilo, Sisi Zlatanova, and Peter van Oosterom. Modelling emergency response processes: Comparative study on OWL and UML. In Proceedings of the Joint ISCRAM-CHINA and GI4DM Conference, 2008.
24. U. Zdun and M. Strembeck. Reusable architectural decisions for dsl design: Foundational decisions in dsl development. pages pages 1-37, 2009.