Measuring variability of procedure progression in proceduralized scenarios

Annals of Nuclear Energy

Volumn 49, Issue , 2012, Pages 41-47

  Kim, Yochan ^a   Park, Jinkyun ^a   Jung, Wondea ^a  

^a Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Human reliability analysis; Non compliance behavior; Performance shaping factor; Variability of procedure progression

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION EXAMPLES; ASSESSMENT METHODS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; HUMAN ERROR PROBABILITY; HUMAN FAILURE; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE; NON-COMPLIANCE; PERFORMANCE SHAPING FACTORS; QUANTITATIVE MEASURES; VARIABILITY OF PROCEDURE PROGRESSION;

NUCLEAR ENERGY;

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84864771108     PISSN: 03064549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2012.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. R.A. Bjork Assessing our own competence: heuristics and illusions D. Gopher, A. Koriat, Attention and Performance XVII 1999 Bradford Book Cambridge, MA 435 459
2. D. Bonchev, and G.A. Buck Quantitative measures of network complexity D. Bonchev, D.H. Rouvray, Complexity in Chemistry, Biology, and Ecology 2005 Springer 91 235
3. P.O. Braarud, and B. Kirwan Task complexity: what challenges the crew and how do they cope A.B. Skjerve, A. Bye, Simulator-based Human Factors Studies Across 25 Years 2010 Springer
4. S.Y. Choi, and J. Park Operator behaviors observed in following emergency operating procedure under a simulated emergency Nucl. Eng. Technol. 44 4 2012 379 386
5. R. Edgar, and S. Batzoglou Multiple sequence alignment Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16 2006 368 373
6. Embrey, D., 1984. SLIM-MAUD: An Approach to Assessing Human Error Probabilities using Structured Expert Judgment. NUREG/CR-3518, USNRC.
7. M.R. Endsley Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems Hum. Factors. 37 1 1995 32 64
8. K. Furuta, K. Sasou, R. Kubota, H. Ujita, Y. Shuto, and E. Yagi Human factor analysis of JCO criticality accident Cogn. Technol. Work. 2 2000 182 203
9. Hirschberg, S., 2004. Human reliability analysis in probabilistic safety assessment for nuclear power plants. CSNI Technical Opinion Papers, No. 4.
10. E. Hollnagel Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Methodology 1998 Elsevier London
11. D.W. Joos, Z.A. Sabri, and A.A. Husseiny Analysis of gross error rates in operation of commercial nuclear power stations Nucl. Eng. Des. 52 1979 265 300
12. W. Jung, and J. Park Estimating the operator's performance time of emergency procedural tasks based on a task complexity measure Nucl. Eng. Technol. 44 4 2012 415 420
13. W.D. Jung, W.C. Yoon, and J.W. Kim Structured information analysis for human reliability analysis of emergency tasks in nuclear power plants Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 71 2011 21 32
14. J.W. Kim, and W. Jung A taxonomy of performance influencing factors for human reliability analysis of emergency tasks J. Loss. Prevent. Proc. 16 2003 479 495
15. A. Kolaczkowski, J. Forester, E. Lois, and S. Cooper Good Practices for Implementing Human Reliability Analysis, NUREG-1792 2005 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC
16. C. Lee, C. Grasso, and M. Sharlow Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs Bioinformatics 18 3 2002 452 464
17. S.W. Lee, A.R. Kim, J.S. Ha, and P.H. Seong Development of a qualitative evaluation framework for performance shaping factors (PSFs) in advanced MCR HRA Ann. Nucl. Energy. 38 2011 1751 1759
18. Lois et al., 2009. International HRA Empirical Study - Phase 1 Report. NUREG/IA-0216.
19. P. Marsden Procedures in the nuclear industry N. Stanton, Human Factors in Nuclear Safety 1996 Taylor & Francis London
20. S. Massaiu Critical features of emergency procedures: empirical insights form simulations of nuclear power plant operation R. Bris, C.G. Soares, S. Martorell, Reliability, Risk and Safety 2010 Taylor and Francis group London 277 284
21. Massaiu, S., 2011. A model-based approach for the collection of human reliability data. ESREL conference, Troyes, France.
22. M. Nakanishi, T. Konishi, and Y. Okada A study on analysis method of performance shaping factors on human error The 3rd International Forum on Safety Engineering and Science (IFSESIII) 2002 Nihon University Japan
23. NEA OECD, 2004. Nuclear regulatory challenges related to human performance. NEA No. 5334.
24. D.A. Norman The Design of Everyday Things 2002 Basic Books New York
25. O'Hara, J., Higgins, J., Stubler, W., Kramer, J., 2002. Computer-based Procedure Systems: technical Basis and Human Factors Review Guidance. NUREG/CR-6634.
26. Paradies, M., Unger L., Haas, P., Terranova, M., 1993. Development of the NRC's human performance investigation process (HPIP). NUREG/CR-5455, vol. 1, USNRC.
27. C.R. Paris, E. Salas, and J.A. Cannon-Bowers Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis Ergonomics 43 8 2000 1052 1075
28. J. Park Scrutinizing inter-relations between performance influencing factors and the performance of human operators pertaining to the emergency tasks of nuclear power plant - an explanatory study Ann. Nucl. Energy. 38 2011 2521 2532
29. J. Park, and W. Jung The operators' non-compliance behavior to conduct emergency operating procedures - comparing with the work experience and the complexity of procedural steps Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 82 2003 115 131
30. J. Park, and W. Jung OPERA-a human performance database under simulated emergencies of nuclear power plants Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 92 4 2007 503 519
31. J. Park, and W. Jung Investigating the effect of communication characteristics on crew performance under the simulated emergency condition of nuclear power plants Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 101 2012 1 13
32. Roth, E.M., Mumaw, R.J., Lewis, P.M., 1994. An empirical investigation of operator performance in cognitively demanding simulated emergencies. NUREG/CR-6208.
33. Skraaning, G. Jr., 2003. Experimental Control Versus Realism: Methodological Solutions for Simulator Studies in Complex Operating Environments. PhD Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
34. T.F. Smith, and M.S. Waterman Identification of common molecular subsequences J. Mol. Biol. 147 1981 195 197