The design of a real-time formative evaluation of the implementation process of lifestyle interventions at two worksites using a 7-step strategy (BRAVO@Work)

BMC Public Health

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Wierenga, Debbie ^a,b,c   Engbers, Luuk H ^a,c   Van Empelen, Pepijn ^c   Hildebrandt, Vincent H ^a,c   Van Mechelen, Willem ^a,b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Data triangulation; Embedded scientist; Formative evaluation; Implementation strategy; Process evaluation; Qualitative study; Worksite health promotion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; RISK REDUCTION; WORKPLACE;

HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84864749206     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-619     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Welke ziekten hebben de hoogste prevalentie? Gommer AM, Poos MJJC, Volksgezondheid toekomstverkenning Bilthoven: RIVM 2010
2. The association between work performance and physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and obesity. Pronk NP, Martinson B, Kessler RC, Beck AL, Simon GE, Wang P, J Occup Environ Med 2004 46 1 19 25 10.1097/01.jom. 0000105910.69449.b7 14724474 (Pubitemid 38084570)
3. The relationship between overweight and obesity, and sick leave: a systematic review. van Duijvenbode DC, Hoozemans MJ, van Poppel MN, Proper KI, Int J Obes (Lond) 2009 33 8 807 816 10.1038/ijo.2009.121
4. Overweight and obesity among Dutch workers: differences between occupational groups and sectors. Proper KI, Hildebrandt VH, Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2010 83 1 61 68 10.1007/s00420-009-0438-1 19506894
5. Overweight and Obesity as Predictors of Absenteeism in the Working Population of the Netherlands. Jans MP, van den Heuvel SG, Hildebrandt VH, Bongers PM, JOEM 2007 49 9 975 980 17848853 (Pubitemid 47396323)
6. Making the link between health and productivity at the workplace-a global perspective. Kirsten W, Ind Health 2010 48 3 251 255 10.2486/indhealth.48.251 20562499
7. Impact of a health promotion program on employee health risks and work productivity. Mills PR, Kessler RC, Cooper J, Sullivan S, Am J Health Promot 2007 22 1 45 53 10.4278/0890-1171-22.1.45 17894263 (Pubitemid 350194754)
8. World Health Organization, Workplace health promotion. The workplace: a priority setting for health promotion 2011 http://www.who.int/occupational- health/topics/workplace/en/index.html
9. Worksite health promotion programs with environmental changes: a systematic review. Engbers LE, van Poppel MN, Chin A, Paw MJ, van Mechelen W, Am J Prev Med 2005 29 1 61 70 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.03.001 15958254 (Pubitemid 40825085)
10. Systematic prevention of overweight and obesity in adults: a qualitative and quantitative literature analysis. Kremers S, Reubsaet A, Martens M, Gerards S, Jonkers R, Candel M, de Weerdt I, de Vries N, Obes Rev 2010 11 5 371 379 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00598.x 19538441
11. Effects of worksite health promotion interventions on employee diets: a systematic review. Ni Mhurchu C, Aston LM, Jebb SA, BMC Public Health 2010 10 10 62 20146795
12. The effectiveness of interventions to change six health behaviors: a review of reviews. Jepson RG, Harris FM, Platt S, Tannahill C, BMC Public Health 2010 8 10 538
13. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Grol R, Wensing M, Med J Aust 2004 180 6 Suppl 57 S60 15012583 (Pubitemid 38372219)
14. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Grol R, Grimshaw J, Lancet 2003 362 9391 1225 1230 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1 14568747 (Pubitemid 37255352)
15. Implementing guidelines in general practice care. Grol R, Qual Health Care 1992 1 3 184 191 10.1136/qshc.1.3.184 10136861
16. Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Durlak JA, DuPre EP, Am J Community Psychol 2008 41 327 350 10.1007/s10464-008- 9165-0 18322790
17. Implementing Clinical Guideline: Current Evidence and Future Implication. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Tetroe J, J Contin Educ Health Prof 2004 24 31 S37 10.1002/chp.1340240506 15712775
18. The role of formative evaluation in implementation research and the QUERI experience. Stetler CB, Legro MW, Wallace CM, Bowman C, Guihan M, Hagedorn H, Kimmel B, Sharp N, Smith JL, J Gen Intern Med 2006 21 Suppl 2 1 S8 16637954
19. Creating the evidence base for quality improvement collaboratives. Mittman BS, Ann Int Med 2004 140 11 897 901 15172904 (Pubitemid 38685271)
20. Evaluation of program implementation. Patton MQ, Eval Stu Rev Annu 1979 4 318 345
21. Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials. Leykum LK, Pugh JA, Lanham HJ, Harmon J, McDaniel RRJ, Implement Sci 2009 4 69 10.1186/1748-5908-4-69 19852784
22. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P, Noonan R, Lubell KS, Stillman L, Blachman M, Dunville R, Saul J, Am J Community Psychol 2008 41 171 181 10.1007/s10464-008-9174-z 18302018
23. Rogers EM, Diffusion of innovations New York: Free Press 2003
24. Invoering van effectief gebleken interventies. Paulussen TH, Wiefferink K, Mesters I, Gezondheidsvoorlichting en gedragsverandering Assen: van Gorcum, Brug J, Asseman P, Lechner L, 2007
25. Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: literature review and Delphi study. Fleuren M, Wiefferink K, Paulussen T, Int J Qual Health Care 2004 16 2 107 123 10.1093/intqhc/mzh030 15051705 (Pubitemid 38489472)
26. Wynne R, European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions: Workplace health promotion in Europe. Research summary Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities 1997
27. Wynne R, Clarkin N, Under construction: building for health in the EC workplace Luxembourg: Officer for Offical Publication of the European Communities 1992
28. BRAVO: a healthy lifestyle. Fortis puts health management on the agenda (BRAVO: een gezonde leefstijl. Fortis zet gezondheidsmanagement op de kaart). Koenders P, Arbo 2008 6 16 19
29. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM, Am J Public Health 1999 89 9 1322
30. The future of physical activity behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Glasgow RE, Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2004 32 2 57 63 10.1097/00003677-200404000-00004 15064649 (Pubitemid 38456577)
31. RE-AIM: evidence-based standards and a web resource to improve translation of research into practice. Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Estabrooks PA, Brock E, Ann Behav Med 2004 28 2 75 80 10.1207/s15324796abm2802-1 15454353 (Pubitemid 39313352)
32. Steckler A, Linnan L, Proces Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2002
33. Rigour and qualitative research. Mays N, Pope C, BMJ 1995 311 6997 109 112 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109 7613363
34. Mays N, Pope C, Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 2000 320 50 52
35. Boeije H, Analyze in qualitative research. (Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek. denken en doen) Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Boom onderwijs 2009
36. Wester F, Peters V, Qualitative analyse. Principles and procedures (Kwalitatieve analyse. Uitgangspunten en procedures) Bussem, The Netherlands: Coutinho bv 2004
37. Pathways process evaluation results: a school-based prevention trial to promote healthful diet and physical activity in American Indian third, fourth, and fifth grade students. Steckler A, Ethelbah B, Martin CJ, Stewart D, Pardilla M, Gittelsohn J, Stone E, Fenn D, Smyth M, Vu M, Prev med 2003 37 80 S90 14636812 (Pubitemid 37433905)
38. Process evaluations of the 5-a-day projects. Baranowski T, Stables G, Health Educ Behav 2000 27 2 157 166 10.1177/109019810002700202 10768797
39. Measuring program outcomes: Using retrospective pretest methodology. Pratt CC, McGuidan WM, Katzev AR, Amer J Evaluation 2000 21 3 341 349
40. ACTION live: using process evaluation to describe implementation of a worksite wellness program. Johnson CC, Lai YL, Rice J, Rose D, Webber LS, J Occup Environ Med 2010 52 Suppl 1 14 S21 20061882
41. Participation in worksite health promotion: a critique of the literature and recommendations for future practice. Glasgow RE, McCaul KD, Fisher KJ, Health Educ Q 1993 20 3 391 408 10.1177/109019819302000309 8307762
42. Improving process evaluations of correctional programs by using a comprehensive evaluation methodology. Bouffard JA, Taxman FS, Silvermand R, Eval Programm Plann 2003 26 149 161 10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00010-7 (Pubitemid 36509153)
43. Work site health promotion research: to what extent can we generalize the results and what is needed to translate research into practice? Bull SS, Gillette C, Glasgow RE, Estabrooks PA, Am J Public Health 2003 30 537 549 (Pubitemid 38569376)
44. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the ned Medical Research Council guidance. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, BMJ 2008 337 1655 979 983
45. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. Campbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J, Emery J, Farmer A, Griffiths F, Guthrie B, Lester H, Wilson P, Kinmonth AL, BMJ 2007 334 7591 455 459 10.1136/bmj.39108. 379965.BE 17332585 (Pubitemid 46586602)