The material move how materials matter in interaction design research

Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS '12

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 486-495

  Fernaeus, Ylva ^a   Sundström, Petra ^b  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

design; interdisciplinary design; materials; mobile technologies; movement based interaction

Indexed keywords

AFFORDANCES; DESIGN CHALLENGES; DIGITAL MATERIALS; INTERACTION DESIGN; INTERDISCIPLINARY DESIGN; MATERIAL PROPERTY; MOBILE INTERACTION; MOBILE TECHNOLOGY; MOVEMENT-BASED; RESEARCH FIELDS; SOFTWARE SOLUTION; SPECIFIC DESIGN;

DESIGN; ELECTRIC PROPERTIES; MATERIALS; RESEARCH;

MATERIALS PROPERTIES;

EID: 84864744675     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2317956.2318029     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Benford, S., et al. (2005). Expected, Sensed, and Desired: A Framework for Designing Sensing-Based Interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(1), 3-30.
2. Blanchette, J-F. (2011). A Material History of Bits. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1024-1057.
3. Brown, B., et al. (2005). Sharing the square: collaborative leisure in the city streets. CSCW'05, Paris, France.
4. Dourish, P., and Mazmanian, M. (2011). Media as Material: Information Representations as Material Foundations for Organizational Practice. Working Paper for the 3rd International Symposium on Process Organization Studies, Corfu, Greece.
5. Dunne, A., and Raby, F. (2001). Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Birkhäuser.
6. Camurri, A., et al. (2008). Social active listening and making of expressive music: the interactive piece the bow is bent and drawn. DIMEA'08, Athens, Greece.
7. Chalmers, M., and Galani, A. (2004). Seamful interweaving: heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems. DIS'04, Cambridge, MA, USA.
8. Fagerberg, P., et al. (2003). Designing gestures for affective input: an analysis of shape, effort and valence, In Proc. of MUM' 2003, Norrköping, Sweden.
9. Gaver, W., et al. (2008). Threshold devices: looking out from the home. CHI'08, Florence, Italy.
10. Gaver, W., et al. (2009). Anatomy of a failure: how we knew when our design went wrong, and what we learned from it. CHI'09, Boston, MA, USA.
11. Hallnäs, L. and Redström, J. (2006). Interaction Design - Foundations, Experiments, The Interactive Institute, The Swedish School of Textiles, and University College of Borås.
12. Halpern, M. K., et al. (2011). MoBoogie: creative expression through whole body musical interaction. CHI'11, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
13. Holmquist, L. E. (2005). "Prototyping: generating ideas or cargo cult designs?" interactions 12(2): 48-54.
14. Isbister, K. and Höök, K. (2009). On being supple: in search of rigor without rigidity in meeting new design and evaluation challenges for HCI practitioners. CHI'09, Boston, MA, USA.
15. Jacobsson, M., et al. (2010). The Look, the Feel and the Action: Making Sets of ActDresses for Robotic Movement. DIS'10, Aarhus, Denmark.
16. Jonsson, M., et al. (2008). Setting the stage - Embodied and spatial dimensions in emerging programming practices. Interacting with computers, 21(1-2), 117-124.
17. Laaksolahti, J., et al. (2011). The LEGA: a device for leaving and finding tactile traces. TEI '11, Madeira, Portugal.
18. Laban, R. and F. C. Lawrence (1974). Effort, Economy of Human Effort, Macdonald & Evans ltd.
19. Löwgren, J. (2007). Inspirational patterns for embodied interaction. Journal of Knowledge, Technology & Policy 20(3).
20. Löwgren, J. and Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology, The MIT Press.
21. Moles, A. A. (1988) Design and Immateriality: What of It in a Post Industrial Society? Design Issues, 4(1/2): 25-32, Designing the Immaterial Society.
22. Ozenc, F. K., et al. (2010). How to support designers in getting hold of the immaterial material of software. CHI'10, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
23. Rekimoto, J. (2002). SmartSkin: an infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces. CHI'02, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
24. Russell, J. A. (1980). A Circumplex Model of Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(6): 1161-1178.
25. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. London, Temple Smith.
26. Shaer, O. and Hornecker, E. (2010). Tangible User Interfaces: Past, Present, and Future Directions. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, 1-2 (2010), 1-137.
27. Solsona, J., et al. (2012) Immaterial Materials: Designing with Radio, TEI'12, Kingston, Canada.
28. Sundström, P., et al. (2007). In Situ Informants Exploring an Emotional Mobile Messaging System in Their Everyday Practice, IJHCS Spec. issue on Evaluating Affective Interfaces, 65(4), 388-403.
29. Sundström, P., et al. (2011). Inspirational Bits - Towards a Shared Understanding of the Digital Material. CHI'11, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
30. Vallgårda, A. and Redström, J. (2007). Computational composites. SIGCHI'07. San Jose, California, USA.