Social media guidance, conflicts of interest, and health inequalities

The Lancet

Volumn 380, Issue 9840, 2012, Pages 472-473

  DeCamp, Matthew ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; HUMAN; LETTER; PATIENT INFORMATION; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONALISM; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84864739175     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61290-2     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. The Lancet. Social media: how doctors can contribute. Lancet 2012; 379: 1562.
2. Shore R, Halsey J, Shah K, Crigger BJ, Douglas SP, AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs (CEJA). Report of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: professionalism in the use of social media. J Clin Ethics 2011; 22: 165-72.
3. Snyder L; American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism, and Human Rights Committee. American College of Physicians ethics manual, 6th edn. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156: 73-104.
4. Lesser CS, Lucey CR, Egener B, Braddock CH 3rd, Linas SL, Levinson W. A behavioral and systems view of professionalism. JAMA 2010; 304: 2732-37.
5. Chretien KC, Azar J, Kind T. Physicians on Twitter. JAMA 2011; 305: 566-68.