Visuomotor gain distortion alters online motor performance and enhances primary motor cortex excitability in patients with stroke

Neuromodulation

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 361-366

  Bagce, Hamid F ^a,b   Saleh, Soha ^c   Adamovich, Sergei V ^b,c   Tunik, Eugene ^a,b  

^a RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

^c NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Plasticity; rehabilitation; sensorimotor; transcranial magnetic stimulation; virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGULAR VELOCITY; ARTICLE; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EXCITABILITY; FEMALE; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; JOINT EXCURSION; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT SMOOTHNESS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NEUROMODULATION; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; SIMULATION; STROKE PATIENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

AGED; BIOMECHANICS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; FINGERS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; NEURONAVIGATION; PARESIS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84864689432     PISSN: 10947159     EISSN: 15251403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00467.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Bastian AJ, et al,. Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res 2005; 166: 126-136.
2. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Edwards DF, Sahrmann SA, Dromerick AW,. Recovery of grasp versus reach in people with hemiparesis poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006; 20: 444-454.
3. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olson TS,. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 394-398.
4. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM,. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 521-524.
5. Olsen TS,. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1990; 21: 247-251.
6. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G,. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011; 377: 1693-1702.
7. Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, Motiwala RR, Cramer SC,. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain 2008; 131: 425-437.
8. Buetefisch C, Heger R, Schicks W, Seitz R, Netz J,. Hebbian-type stimulation during robot-assisted training in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 645-655.
9. Merians AS, Fluet GG, Qiu Q, et al,. Robotically facilitated virtual rehabilitation of arm transport integrated with finger movement in persons with hemiparesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011; 8: 27. PMCID: 3113321.
10. Saposnik G, Levin M,. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke 2011; 42: 1380-1386.
11. Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M, et al,. Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke 2010; 41: 1477-1484.
12. Merians AS, Tunik E, Adamovich SV,. Virtual reality to maximize function for hand and arm rehabilitation: exploration of neural mechanisms. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 145: 109-125.
13. Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Mathai A, Qiu Q, Lewis J, Merians AS,. Design of a complex virtual reality simulation to train finger motion for persons with hemiparesis: a proof of concept study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009; 6: 28. PMCID: 2729310.
14. Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Tunik E, Merians AS,. Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review. NeuroRehabilitation 2009; 25: 29-44. PMCID: 2819065.
15. Arce F, Novick I, Mandelblat-Cerf Y, Vaadia E,. Neuronal correlates of memory formation in motor cortex after adaptation to force field. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 9189-9198.
16. Paz R, Boraud T, Natan C, Bergman H, Vaadia E,. Preparatory activity in motor cortex reflects learning of local visuomotor skills. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6: 882-890.
17. Wise SP, Moody SL, Blomstrom KJ, Mitz AR,. Changes in motor cortical activity during visuomotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 1998; 121: 285-299.
18. Mandelblat-Cerf Y, Paz R, Vaadia E,. Trial-to-trial variability of single cells in motor cortices is dynamically modified during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 15053-15062.
19. Wei Y, Bajaj P, Scheidt R, Patton J,. A real-time haptic/graphic demonstration of how error augmentation can enhance learning. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Barcelona, 2005.
20. Matsuoka Y, Brewer BR, Klatzky RL,. Using visual feedback distortion to alter coordinated pinching patterns for robotic rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007; 4: 17. PMCID: 1904454.
21. Patton JL, Stoykov ME, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA,. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Exp Brain Res 2006; 168: 368-383.
22. Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C,. Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 8916-8924.
23. Palluel-Germain R, Jax SA, Buxbaum LJ,. Visuo-motor gain adaptation and generalization following left hemisphere stroke. Neurosci Lett 2011; 498: 222-226. PMCID: 3119783.
24. Coombes SA, Corcos DM, Sprute L, Vaillancourt DE,. Selective regions of the visuomotor system are related to gain-induced changes in force error. J Neurophysiol 2010; 103: 2114-2123. PMCID: 2853269.
25. Aranyi Z, Mathis J, Hess CW, Rosler KM,. Task-dependent facilitation of motor evoked potentials during dynamic and steady muscle contractions. Muscle Nerve 1998; 21: 1309-1316.
26. Ni Z, Takahashi M, Yamashita T, et al,. Functional demanded excitability changes of human hand motor area. Exp Brain Res 2006; 170: 141-148.
27. Kasai T, Yahagi S,. Motor evoked potentials of the first dorsal interosseous muscle in step and ramp index finger abduction. Muscle Nerve 1999; 22: 1419-1425.
28. Datta AK, Harrison LM, Stephens JA,. Task-dependent changes in the size of response to magnetic brain stimulation in human first dorsal interosseous muscle. J Physiol 1989; 418: 13-23. PMCID: 1189957.
29. Flament D, Goldsmith P, Buckley CJ, Lemon RN,. Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man. J Physiol 1993; 464: 361-378. PMCID: 1175390.
30. Celnik P, Paik NJ, Vandermeeren Y, Dimyan M, Cohen LG,. Effects of combined peripheral nerve stimulation and brain polarization on performance of a motor sequence task after chronic stroke. Stroke 2009; 40: 1764-1771. PMCID: 2692264.
31. Hegele M, Heuer H,. Adaptation to a direction-dependent visuomotor gain in the young and elderly. Psychol Res 2010; 74: 21-34.
32. Facchini S, Muellbacher W, Battaglia F, Boroojerdi B, Hallett M,. Focal enhancement of motor cortex excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Acta Neurol Scand 2002; 105: 146-151.
33. Bagce HF, Saleh S, Adamovich SV, Krakauer JW, Tunik E,. Exaggeration of visual errors during goal-directed movements enhances primary motor cortex excitability in healthy subjects and stroke patients. Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting; San Diego, CA. Program No. 84.132010. p. Program No. 84.13, 2010.