On the properties of the R2 indicator

GECCO'12 - Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 465-472

  Brockhoff, Dimo ^a   Wagner, Tobias ^b   Trautmann, Heike ^b  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

hypervolume indicator; multiobjective optimization; performance assessment; r2 indicator

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; HYPERVOLUME; OPTIMAL DISTRIBUTIONS; PARETO FRONT; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE COMPARISON; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; SCALARIZATION; WEIGHT VECTOR;

ALGORITHMS; BENCHMARKING; PARETO PRINCIPLE;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84864669908     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2330163.2330230     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. A. Auger, J. Bader, D. Brockhoff, and E. Zitzler. Theory of the Hypervolume Indicator: Optimal μ-Distributions and the Choice of the Reference Point. In Foundations of Genetic Algorithms (FOGA 2009), pages 87-102, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
2. A. Auger, J. Bader, D. Brockhoff, and E. Zitzler. Hypervolume-based Multiobjective Optimization: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Implications. Theoretical Computer Science, 425:75-103, 2012.
3. N. Beume et al. Hypervolume, 2 2012. http://www.hypervolume.org.
4. N. Beume, C. M. Fonseca, M. Lopez-Ibanez, L. Paquete, and J. Vahrenhold. On the Complexity of Computing the Hypervolume Indicator. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 13(5):1075-1082, 2009.
5. N. Beume, B. Naujoks, and M. Emmerich. SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(3):1653-1669, 2007.
6. K. Deb, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, and E. Zitzler. Scalable Multi-Objective Optimization Test Problems. In Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2002), pages 825-830. IEEE Press, 2002.
7. M. P. Hansen and A. Jaszkiewicz. Evaluating The Quality of Approximations of the Non-Dominated Set. Technical report, Institute of Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark, 1998. IMM Technical Report IMM-REP-1998-7.
8. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier. Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies. Evolutionary Computation, 9(2):159-195, 2001.
9. G. W. Snedecor and W. G. Cochran. Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Iowa, 1989.
10. S. Wessing. Towards Optimal Parameterizations of the S-Metric Selection Evolutionary Multi-Objective Algorithm. Diploma Thesis, Technical Report TR 09-06, TU Dortmund, 2009.
11. S. Wessing and B. Naujoks. Sequential parameter optimization for multi-objective problems. In IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 1-8. IEEE, 2010.
12. E. Zitzler. Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Methods and Applications. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, 1999.
13. E. Zitzler, K. Deb, and L. Thiele. Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results. Evolutionary Computation, 8(2):173-195, 2000.
14. E. Zitzler, J. Knowles, and L. Thiele. Quality Assessment of Pareto Set Approximations. In Multiobjective Optimization: Interactive and Evolutionary Approaches, pages 373-404. Springer, 2008.
15. E. Zitzler and L. Thiele. Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study. In Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN V), pages 292-301, 1998.
16. E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, C. M. Fonseca, and V. Grunert da Fonseca. Performance Assessment of Multiobjective Optimizers: An Analysis and Review. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 7(2):117-132, 2003.