Criteria of geographic relevance: An experimental study

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1495-1520

  de Sabbata, Stefano ^a   Reichenbacher, Tumasch ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

criteria of relevance; geographic relevance; location based services; mobility

Indexed keywords

GIS; MOBILE COMMUNICATION; MOBILITY; SPATIAL DATA;

EID: 84864660050     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2011.639303     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barry, C. 1994. User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3): 149-159.
2. Barry, C. and Schamber, L. 1998. Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: a cross-situational comparison. Information Processing and Management, 34(2-3): 219-236.
3. Bierig, R. and Göker, A. Time, location and interest: an empirical and user-centred study. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Information interaction in context. Copenhagen, Denmark. New York. pp.79-87. ACM.
4. Bookstein, A. 1979. Relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30(5): 269-273.
5. Boyce, B. 1982. Beyond topicality: a two stage view of relevance and the retrieval process. Information Processing & Management, 18(3): 105-109.
6. Coppola, P. 2004. "The concept of relevance in mobile and ubiquitous information access". In Mobile and ubiquitous information access, Vol. 2954 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Edited by: Crestani, F., Dunlop, M. and Mizzaro, S. 3-6. Berlin: Springer.
7. Couclelis, H. 1987. Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7(2): 99-122.
8. Crease, P. and Reichenbacher, T. Adapting cartographic representations to improve the information seeking of LBS users. Proceedings of 25th international cartographic conference. July2011. France
9. da Costa Pereira, C., Dragoni, M. and Pasi, G. 2001. "Multidimensional relevance: a new aggregation criterion". In Advances in information retrieval, Edited by: Boughanem, M., Berrut, C., Mothe, J. and Soule-Dupuy, C. 264-275. Berlin: Springer. Vol. 5478 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science
10. De Sabbata, S. Criteria of geographic relevance. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on geographic information science. September2010. Zurich, Switzerland
11. Golledge, R. 2002. The nature of geographic knowledge. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1): 1-14.
12. Han, J., Kamber, M. and Tung, A. 2001. "Spatial clustering methods in data mining". In Geographic data mining and knowledge discovery, Edited by: Miller, H.J. and Han, J. 188-217. London: Taylor and Francis.
13. Huang, Y., Shekhar, S. and Xiong, H. 2004. Discovering colocation patterns from spatial data sets: a general approach. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16(12): 1472-1485.
14. Jordan, T. 1998. An affordance-based model of place in GIS. Proceedings of 8th International symposium on spatial data handling, SDH. July1998, Princeton, NJ. Vol. 98, pp.98-109. Vancouver, Canada: Citeseer.
15. Koperski, K. and Han, J. 2001. "Discovery of spatial association rules in geographic information databases". In Advances in spatial databases, Edited by: Egenhofer, M. and Herring, J. 47-66. Berlin: Springer. 951 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science
16. Miller, H. and Bridwell, S. 2009. A field-based theory for time geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(1): 49-75.
17. Mizzaro, S. 1997. Relevance: the whole history. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 48(9): 810-832.
18. Mountain, D. and MacFarlane, A. 2007. Geographic information retrieval in a mobile environment: evaluating the needs of mobile individuals. Journal of Information Science, 33(5): 515
19. Pombinho, P., Carmo, M. and Afonso, A. Evaluation of overcluttering prevention techniques for mobile devices. Proceedings of 13th International conference information visualisation. July2009, New York. pp.127-134. Barcelona, Spain: IEEE.
20. Raper, J. 2007. Geographic relevance. Journal of Documentation, 63(6): 836-852.
21. Raubal, M., Miller, H. and Bridwell, S. 2004. User-centred time geography for location-based services. Geografiska Annaler Series B Human Geography, 86(4): 245-265.
22. Reichenbacher, T. 2004. Mobile cartography: adaptive visualisation of geographic information on mobile devices, Munchen: Verlag Dr. Hut.
23. Reichenbacher, T. 2005. The importance of being relevant. Proceeding XXII international cartographic conference. July2005. Spain: A Coruna.
24. Reichenbacher, T. 2004. "The concept of relevance in mobile maps". In Location based services and telecartography, Edited by: Gartner, G., Cartwright, W., Peterson, M.P. and Meng, L. 231-246. Berlin: Springer.
25. Reichenbacher, T. 2009. Geographic relevance in mobile services. Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on location and the web. April2009, Boston. pp.10New York, MA: ACM.
26. Reichenbacher, T., Crease, P. and De Sabbata, S. The concept of geographic relevance. Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on LBS & TeleCartography. September2009. Nottingham, UK
27. Ross, J. Who are the crowdworkers?: shifting demographics in mechanical turk. Proceedings of the 28th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. April2010, Atlanta, GA. pp.2863-2872. New York: ACM.
28. Saracevic, T. Relevance reconsidered. Proceedings of the 2nd conference on conceptions of library and information science. October1996, Copenhagen, Denmark. pp.201-218. Denmark: Royal School of Librarianship.
29. Saracevic, T. 2007. Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13): 1915-1933.
30. Savolainen, R. and Kari, J. 2006. User-defined relevance criteria in web searching. Journal of Documentation, 62(6): 685-707.
31. Schamber, L. 1991. Users' criteria for evaluation in multimedia information seeking and use situations. Information Processing and Management, 30(2): 205-221.
32. Stevens, A. and Coupe, P. 1978. Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive psychology, 10(4): 422-437.
33. Wilson, P. 1973. Situational relevance. Information storage and retrieval, 9(8): 457-471.
34. Xu, Y.C. and Chen, Z. 2006. Relevance judgment: What do information users consider beyond topicality?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(7): 961-973.
35. Zipf, A. Die Relevanz von Geoobjekten in Fokuskarten. Proceeding of Symposium fur Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung. July2003, Salzburg, Austria. pp.567-576. Heidelberg: Wichmann.