Antibiotic or induction agent? Another problem from a possible solution

Anaesthesia

Volumn 67, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1048-1049

  Quinn, L ^a   Furness, G ^a  

^a ANTRIM AREA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMOXICILLIN PLUS CLAVULANIC ACID; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; PROPOFOL; THIOPENTAL;

ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; CESAREAN SECTION; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INFECTION PREVENTION; LETTER; MEDICATION ERROR; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; SURGICAL INFECTION;

ANESTHETICS; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84864658901     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07278.x     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Marr R, Boyle G, Blythell V,. Antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section: exchanging one risk for another? Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 678-9.
2. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence clinical guideline 132. Caesarean Section, November 2011. (accessed 09/06/2012).
3. Webster CS, Merry AF, Larson L, McGrath KA, Weller J,. The frequency and nature of drug administration error during anaesthesia. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2001; 29: 494-500. (Pubitemid 32970453)