Dealing with wicked issues: Open strategizing and the camisea case

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 96, Issue , 2010, Pages 11-19

  Schmitt, Ruth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES AND ARTS NORTHWESTERN SWITZERLAND   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Stakeholder engagement; Stakeholder relations; Strategizing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864654321     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0938-2     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anonymous. (1994). Shell to study development of Peru’s Camisea gas/condensate. Oil and Gas Journal, 92(13), 32.
2. Bendell, J. (2000). Talking for change? Reflections on effective stakeholder dialogue. New Academy of Business Innovation Network (online). Retrieved September 18, 2009, from http://www.new-academy.ac.uk/publications/keypublications/documents/talkingforchange.pdf.
3. Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. (2005). Setting new agendas—Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81(3), 499-513.
4. Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. C. (1992). Leadership for the common good—Tackling public problems in a shared power world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
5. Callon, M. (1980). Struggles and negotiations to define what is problematic and what is not. In K. Knorr, R. Krohn, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The social process of scientific investigation—Sociology of the sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 197-219). Dordrecht and London: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
6. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation—Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief (pp. 196-233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
7. Callon, M. (1992). The dynamics of techno-economic networks. In P. S. R. Coombs & V. Walsh (Eds.), Technological change and company strategies—Economic and sociological perspectives (pp. 72-102). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.
8. Camillus, J. (2008). Strategy as a wicked problem. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 99-106.
9. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
10. Frynas, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and international development—Critical assessment. Corporate Governance, 15(4), 274-281.
11. Harrisson, D., & Laberge, M. (2002). Innovation, identities and resistance—The social construction of an innovation network. Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 497-521.
12. Higgins, R. B., & Diffenbach, J. (1989). Strategic credibility—The basis of a strong share price. Long Range Planning, 22(6), 10-18.
13. Idemudia, U. (2009). Oil extraction and poverty reduction in the Niger delta—A critical examination of partnership initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 91-116.
14. Jones, M. (1997). The role of stakeholder participation—Linkages to stakeholder impact assessment and social capital in Camisea, Peru. Greener Management International, 19(3), 87-97.
15. Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor network—Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Retrieved December 15, 2003, from http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Law-Notes-on-ANT.pdf.
16. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005a). Corporate citizenship—Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166-179.
17. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005b). What is stakeholder democracy? Perspectives and issues. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(1), 6-13.
18. May, P., Dabbs, A., Fernandez-Davila, P., Gonçalves da Vinha, V., & Zaidenweber, N. (1999). Corporate roles and rewards in promoting sustainable development—Lessons learned from Camisea. Berkeley, CA: Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley.
19. Newell, S. J., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2001). The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 52(3), 235-247.
20. Nijhof, A., & Jeurissen, R. (2006). A sensemaking perspective on corporate social responsibility—Introduction to the special issue. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 316-322.
21. Page, N., & Czuba, C. (1999). Empowerment—What is it? Journal of Extension, 37(5) (online). Retrieved September 15, 2009, from http://www.joe.org/joe/1999october/comm1.html.
22. Pasquero, J. (1996). Stakeholder theory as a constructivist paradigm. Proceedings of the international association for business and society, Seventh annual conference, Santa Fe, NM, pp. 584-589.
23. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
24. Payne, S. L., & Calton, J. M. (2002). Towards a managerial practice of stakeholder engagement—Developing multi-stakeholder learning dialogues. In J. Andriof, S. A. Waddock, B. W. Husted, & S. Sutherland Rahman (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking (pp. 121-135). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
25. Post, J., Preston, L., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation—Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
26. Ramiller, N. (2005). Applying the sociology of translation to a system project in a lagging enterprise. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 7(1), 51-76.
27. Rozas, U. (1997). Umweltschutz vor Menschenrecht? Erdölexploration im Madre de Dios (Peru) im Spannungsfeld von Profit, Naturschutz und indigenen Rechten. Infoe Magazin, Zeitschrift für Ökologie und “vierte Welt”, 12(1), pp. 24-27.
28. Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 61-75.
29. Sawyer, S., & Terence Gomez, E. (2008). Transnational governmentality and resource extraction—Indigenous peoples, multinational corporations, multilateral institutions and the state, identities, conflict and cohesion programme. Paper Number 13, United Research Institute for Social Development.
30. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate citizenship in a globalized world—Introduction to the handbook of research on global corporate citizenship. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 1-21). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
31. Schwerin, E. (1995). Mediation, citizen empowerment and transformational politics. London: Praeger.
32. Strauss, A. (1978). A social world perspective. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 119-128). Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.
33. Strauss, A. (1988). Negotiations—Varieties, contexts, processes and social orders (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34. Strauss, A. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
35. Strauss, A., Bucher, R., Ehrlich, D., Sabshin, M., & Schatzmann, L. (1991). Negotiated order and the coordination of work. In A. Strauss (Ed.), Creating sociological awareness (pp. 3-32). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
36. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research—Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
37. Waddock, S. (2001). Integrity and mindfulness. In J. Andriof & M. McIntosh (Eds.), Perspectives on corporate citizenship (pp. 26-38). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
38. Worden, S. (2003). The role of integrity as a mediator in strategic leadership-A recipe for reputational capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 31-44.
39. Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research—Design and methods (4th ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.