Personalization and user verification in wearable systems using biometric walking patterns

Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 563-580

  Casale, Pierluigi ^a   Pujol, Oriol ^b   Radeva, Petia ^b  

^a Barcelona Perception Computing Lab   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

One class classification; User personalization; User verification; Wearable devices

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY RECOGNITION; CONVEX HULL; DATA SETS; ERROR RATE; FOUR-LAYER ARCHITECTURE; GEOMETRIC CONCEPTS; NON-CONVEX SHAPES; NOVEL TECHNIQUES; ONE-CLASS CLASSIFICATION; PERSONALIZATIONS; ROUGH TERRAINS; SMALL SAMPLES; STATE-OF-THE-ART TECHNOLOGY; TEMPORAL COHERENCE; USER VERIFICATION; WALKING PATTERN; WEARABLE DEVICES; WEARABLE SYSTEMS;

BIOMETRICS; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING; WEARABLE COMPUTERS;

AUTHENTICATION;

EID: 84864633322     PISSN: 16174909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00779-011-0415-z     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bao L, Intille SS (2004) Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In: Pervasive. Springer, Berlin, pp 1-17
2. Bennett KP, Bredensteiner EJ (2000) Duality and geometry in svm classifiers. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth international conference on machine learning, ICML '00. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, San Francisco, pp 57-64
3. Bianchi L, Angelini D, Lacquaniti F (1998) Individual characteristics of human walking mechanics. Pflügers Archiv Eur J Physiol 436:343-356
4. Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24:123-140
5. Derawi MO, Nickel C, Bours P, Busch C (2010) Unobtrusive user-authentication on mobile phones using biometric gait recognition
6. Dietterich TG, Bakiri G (1991) Error-correcting output codes: a general method for improving multiclass inductive learning programs. In: Proceedings of AAAI-91, AAAI Press, Anaheim, pp 572-577
7. Freund Y, Schapire RE (1999) A short introduction to boosting
8. Gafurov D, Snekkenes E, Buvarp T (2006) Robustness of biometric gait authentication against impersonation attack. In: Meersman R, Tari Z, Herrero P (eds) On the move to meaningful internet systems 2006: OTM 2006 workshops, lecture notes in computer science, vol 4277. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 479-488
9. Lester J, Choudhury T, Borriello G (2006) A practical approach to recognizing physical activities. In: Proceedings of pervasive, pp 1-16
10. Mannini A, Sabatini AM (2010) Machine learning methods for classifying human physical activity from on-body accelerometers. Sensors 10(2):1154-1175
11. Mäntyjärvi J, Lindholm M, Vildjiounaite E, marja Mäkelä S, Ailisto H (2005) Identifying users of portable devices from gait pattern with accelerometers. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing
12. Preparata FP, Shamos MI (1985) Computational geometry: an introduction. Springer, New York
13. Ravi N, Nikhil D, Mysore P, Littman ML (2005) Activity recognition from accelerometer data. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on innovative applications of artificial intelligence (IAAI). AAAI Press, California, pp 1541-1546
14. Sprott JC (2003) Chaos and time-series analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford
15. Tax DMJ, Juszczak P (2002) Kernel whitening for one-class classification
16. Terrier P, Schutz Y (2003) Variability of gait patterns during unconstrained walking assessed by satellite positioning (GPS). Eur J Appl Physiol 90(5-6):554-561
17. Vildjiounaite E, Makela SM, Lindholm M, Kyllonen V, Ailisto H (2007) Increasing security of mobile devices by decreasing user effort in verification. IEEE Comput Soc 80