The embryonic development of Xenopus laevis under a low frequency electric field

In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Animal

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 385-391

  Boga, Ayper ^a   Binokay, Secil ^a   Emre, Mustafa ^a   Sertdemir, Yasar ^a  

^a CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Development; Electric field; Teratogenicity; Xenopus laevis formation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; ELECTRICITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; RADIATION EXPOSURE; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; ELECTRICITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANURA; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 84864559236     PISSN: 10712690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11626-012-9519-7     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aetna (2010). Clinical policy Bulletin: Electrical Stimulation for Chronic Ulcer. Number 0680 web: http://www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/600-699/ 0680html.
2. American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) (2004). Standart Guide for Conducting the Frog Embryo-Teratogenesis Assay -Xenopus, FETAX, E1439-98. In: ASTM Standarts on biological effects and environmental fate. Vol. 11. 05. Philadelphia, PA, 447-457.
3. Aydin M.; Koksal F.; Gunay I.; Serin M. S.; Polat S. The Effect of Antibacterial Silver Electrodes and the Nature of Ion Emission in the Outer Side of Inhibition Zone. Ann Med Sci 5(2): 52-57; 1997a. (Pubitemid 27429663)
4. Aydin M.; Serin M. S.; Pelit A.; Günay I. Silver Anode-Induced Phenotypical Changes in Bacteria. Ann Med Sci 6(2): 83-87; 1997b. (Pubitemid 28458290)
5. Berger TJ, Spadaro JA, Chapin SE, Becker RO (1976). Electrically Generated Silver Ions: Quantitative Effects on Bacterial and Mammalian Cells. J Antimicrob Chemother 357-358.
6. Boga A.; Binokay S.; Kendirci A. Experimental Embryology in Xenopus laevis. Turk J Biol 21: 141-148; 1997.
7. Boga A.; Erdogan S.; Sertdemir Y. Effect of spesific dosages of magnesium and zinc on the teratogenicity of cadmium, nickel, and cobalt in Xenopus embryos, as assessed by the FETAX test. Dose-Response 6: 16-29; 2008.
8. Borgens R. B.; Vanable Jr. J. W.; Jaffe L. F. Bioelectricity and regeneration: large currents leave the stumps of regenerating newt limbs. Proc Natl Acad Sci 74(10): 4528-4532; 1977. (Pubitemid 8225158)
9. Bourguignon G. J.; Bourguignon L. Y. V. Electric Stimulation of Protein and DNA Synthesis in Human Fibroblast. FASEB J 1: 398-402; 1987. (Pubitemid 18033760)
10. Brown M. J.; Loew L. M. Electric Field-Directed Fibroblast Locomotion Involves Cell Surface Molecular Reorganization and is Calcium Independent. J Cell Biol 127(1): 117-128; 1994. (Pubitemid 24307661)
11. Cormie P, Kenneth R. Robinson (2007). Embryonic Zebrafish Neuronal Growth is not Affected by an Applied Electric Field In Vitro. Neurosci Lett 10; 411(2): 128-132. (Pubitemid 44820683)
12. Eide F. F.; Eisenberg S. R.; Sanders T. A. Electroporation-Mediated Gene Transfer in Free-Swimming Embryonic Xenopus laevis. FEBS Letters 486: 29-32; 2000.
13. Fitzsimmons R. J.; Strong D. D.; Mohan S.; Baylink D. J. Low Amplitude, Low -Frequency Electric Field-Stimulated Bone Cell Proliferation May in Part Be Mediated by Increased IGF-II Release. J Cellular Physio 150: 84-89; 1992.
14. Gaudeau C.; Bergamini J. F.; Bobola P.; Brault F.; Rakotomalala V.; Muniere V.; Benoist S.; Robert E. Expert System for Modeling and Simulating the Action of Electric and Electromagnetic Fields on Biological Membranes. Molecular Engineering 8: 31-59; 1998.
15. Gentzkow G. D.; Miller K. H. Electrical Stimulation for Dermal Wound Healing. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery 8 (4): 827-841; 1991.
16. Guérin P.; Mouatassim E.; Ménézo S. Oxidative stress and protection against reactive oxygen species in the pre-implantation embryo and its surroundings. Human Reprod Update 7: 175-189; 2001.
17. Harrington D. B.; Becker R. O. Electrical Stimulation of RNA and Protein Synthesis in the Frog Erythrocyte. Exp Cell Res 76(1): 95-98; 1973.
18. Hinkle L. C.; McCaig D.; Kenneth K. R. The direction of growth of differantiating neurons and myoblasts from frog embryos in an applied electric field. J of Physiol 314: 121-135; 1981.
19. Jaffe L. F.; Poo M. M. Neurites grow faster towards the cathode than the anode in a steady field. J Exp Zool 209(1): 115-28; 1979.
20. Juutilainen J. Developmental effects of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 106(4): 385-390; 2003. (Pubitemid 37547893)
21. Koo O. J.; Jang G.; Kwon D. K.; Kang J. T.; Kwon O. S.; Park H. J.; Kang S. K.; Lee B. C. Electrical activation induces reactive oxygen species in porcine embryos. Theriogenology 70: 1111-1118; 2008.
22. Lindi C.; Montorfano G.; Rossi F.; Gornati R.; Rizzo A. M. Effect of Ethanol Exposure on Xenopus embryo lipid Composition. Alcohol and Alcoholism 36(5): 388-392; 2001. (Pubitemid 32851419)
23. Mendonca A. C.; Barbieri C. H.; Mazzer N. Directly Applied Low Intensity Direct Electric Current Enhances Peripheral Nerve Regeneration in Rats. J Neurosci Methods 129: 183-190; 2003. (Pubitemid 37168014)
24. Messerli M. A.; Graham D. M. Extracellular electrical fields direct wound healing and regeneration. Biol Bull 221(1): 79-92; 2011.
25. Nieuwkoop P. D.; Faber J. Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (DAUDIN). Garland Publishing, INC, Newyork; 1994.
26. Nuccitelli R. Endogenous Electric Fields in Embryos During Development, Regeneration and Wound Healing. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 106(4): 375-383; 2003.
27. Oji C, Ani J (2010). Destruction of an Advanced Malignant Tumour by Direct Electrical Current. Case report 2(9
28. Palmer A. M.; Messerli M. A.; Robinson K. R. Neuronal galvanotropism is independent of external Ca(2+) entry or internal Ca(2+) gradients. J Neurobiol 45(1): 30-8; 2000.
29. Patel N.; Poo M. M. Orientation of Neurite Growth by Extracellular Electric Fields. J Neurosci 2(4): 483-496; 1982. (Pubitemid 12040435)
30. Pilla A. A. State of the Art in Electromagnetic Therapeutics: Soft Tissue Applications. In: Bersani F. (ed) Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine. Newyork, Kluwer academic/Plenum, pp 871-874; 1999.
31. Popova E.; Bader M.; Krivokharchenko A. Effects of electric field on early preimplantation development in vitro in mice and rats. Human Reprod. 26(3): 662-670; 2011.
32. Robinson K. R. The Responses of Cells to Electrical Fields: A Review. J Cell Biol 101: 2023-2027; 1985. (Pubitemid 16169930)
33. Sauer H.; Bekhite M. M.; Hescheler J.; Wartenberg M. Redox control of angiogenic factors and CD31-positive vessel-like structures in mouse embryonic stem cells after direct current electrical field stimulation. Exp Cell Res 304(2): 380-390; 2005. (Pubitemid 40321117)
34. Shen P. C.; Lee S. N.; Wu J. S.; Huang J. C.; Chu F. H.; Chang C. C.; Kung J. C.; Lin H. H.; Chen L. R.; Shiau J. W.; Yen N. T.; Cheng W. T. K. The effect of electrical field strength on activation and development of cloned caprine embryos. Animal Reprod Sci 92: 310-320; 2006.
35. Shoogo U.; Koosuke H.; Shiokawa K. The Embryonic Development of Frogs Under Strong DC Magnetic Fields. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics MAG-20(5): 1663-1665; 1984. (Pubitemid 15502869)
36. Zhao M.; Fernandez A. A.; Forrester J. V.; Mc Caig C. D. Orientation and Directed Migration or Cultured Corneal Epithelial Cells in Small Electric Fields are Serum Dependent. J Cell Sci 109: 1405-1414; 1996. (Pubitemid 26190490)