Compliant model of a coupled sequential coronary arterial bypass graft: Effects of vessel wall elasticity and non-Newtonian rheology on blood flow regime and hemodynamic parameters distribution

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 860-872

  Kabinejadian, Foad ^a   Ghista, Dhanjoo N ^b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b FRAMINGHAM STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CABG; CFD; Coronary arterial bypass grafting (CABG); CT; DV; ETS; Fluid structure interaction (FSI); FSI; Hemodynamic parameters; HP; IT; LAD; LDL; Non Newtonian rheology; OSI; RCA; Sequential anastomoses; SQA; STS; TAWSS; TAWSSG; WSS; WSSG

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL BYPASS; CABG; CT; DV; ETS; FSI; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HP; IT; LAD; LDL; NON-NEWTONIAN RHEOLOGY; OSI; RCA; SEQUENTIAL ANASTOMOSES; SQA; STS; TAWSS; TAWSSG; WSS; WSSG;

BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DESIGN; ELASTICITY; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; HEMODYNAMICS; LAMINAR FLOW; LUBRICATION; NON NEWTONIAN LIQUIDS; SURGERY;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ARTERY COMPLIANCE; ARTERY WALL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; END TO END ANASTOMOSIS; LAMINAR FLOW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; SIDE TO SIDE ANASTOMOSIS; SIMULATION;

BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD CIRCULATION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY VESSELS; ELASTICITY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RHEOLOGY; SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84864555998     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: 18734030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Buchanan J.R., Kleinstreuer C., Hyun S., Truskey G.A. Hemodynamics simulation and identification of susceptible sites of atherosclerotic lesion formation in a model abdominal aorta. Journal of Biomechanics 2003, 36:1185-1196.
2. Caro C.G., Fitz-Gerald J.M., Schroter R.C. Atheroma and arterial wall shear. Observation, correlation and proposal of a shear dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 1971, 177:109-159.
3. Caro C.G., Parker K.H. The effect of hemo-dynamics factors on the arterial wall 1987, 183-195. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. A.G. Olsson (Ed.).
4. Friedman M.H., Bargeron C.B., Deters O.J., Hutchins G.M., Mark F.F. Correlation between wall shear and intimal thickness at a coronary artery branch. Atherosclerosis 1987, 68:27-33.
5. Fry D.L. Acute vascular endothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients. Circulation Research 1968, 22:165-197.
6. Hofer M., Rappitsch G., Perktold K., Trubel W., Schima H. Numerical study of wall mechanics and fluid dynamics in end-to-side anastomoses and correlation to intimal hyperplasia. Journal of Biomechanics 1996, 29:1297-1308.
7. Nerem R.M., Cornhill J.F. The role of fluid mechanics in atherogenesis. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1980, 102:181-189.
8. Bassiouny H.S., White S., Glagov S., Choi E., Giddens D.P., Zarins C.K. Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: mechanical injury or flow induced. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1992, 15:708-717.
9. Sottiurai V.S., Yao J.S.T., Batson R.C., Sue S.L., Jones R., Nakamura Y.A. Distal anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: histopathologic character and biogenesis. Annals of Vascular Surgery 1989, 3:26-33.
10. Trubel W., Schima H., Moritz A., Raderer F., Windisch A., Ullrich R., et al. Compliance mismatch and formation of distal anastomotic intimal hyperplasia in externally stiffened and lumen-adapted venous grafts. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 1995, 10:415-423.
11. Fei D.Y., Thomas J.D., Rittgers S.E. The effect of angle and flow rate upon hemodynamics in distal vascular graft anastomoses: a numerical model study. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1994, 116:331-336.
12. Staalsen N.H. The anastomosis angle does change the flow fields at vascular end-to-side anastomoses in vivo. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1995, 21:460-471.
13. How T.V., Rowe C.S., Gilling-Smith G.L., Harris P.L. Interposition vein cuff anastomosis alters wall shear stress distribution in the recipient artery. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2000, 31:1008-1017.
14. Lei M., Kleinstreuer C., Archie J.P. Geometric design improvements for femoral graft-artery junctions mitigating restenosis. Journal of Biomechanics 1996, 29:1605-1614.
15. Leuprecht A., Perktold K., Prosi M., Berk T., Trubel W., Schima H. Numerical study of hemodynamics and wall mechanics in distal end-to-side anastomoses of bypass grafts. Journal of Biomechanics 2002, 35:225-236.
16. Sankaranarayanan M., Ghista D.N., Chua L.P., Tan Y.S., Kassab G.S. Analysis of blood flow in an out-of-plane CABG model. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 2006, 291:H283-H295.
17. Sherwin S.J., Shah O., Doorly D.J., Peiró J., Papaharilaou Y., Watkins N., et al. The influence of out-of-plane geometry on the flow within a distal end-to-side anastomosis. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2000, 122:86-95.
18. Bonert M., Myers J.G., Fremes S., Williams J., Ethier C.R. A numerical study of blood flow in coronary artery bypass graft side-to-side anastomoses. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2002, 30:599-611.
19. Qiao A., Liu Y. Influence of graft-host diameter ratio on the hemodynamics of CABG. Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering 2006, 16:189-201.
20. Kabinejadian F., Chua L.P., Ghista D.N., Sankaranarayanan M., Tan Y.S. A novel coronary artery bypass graft design of sequential anastomoses. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010, 38:3135-3150.
21. Perktold K., Rappitsch G. Advances in bioengineering 1993, vol. 26:127-130. ASME, New York.
22. Perktold K., Rappitsch G. Computer simulation of local blood flow and vessel mechanics in a compliant carotid artery bifurcation model. Journal of Biomechanics 1995, 28:845-856.
23. Tang D., Yang C., Kobayashi S., Zheng J., Vito R.P. Effect of stenosis asymmetry on blood flow and artery compression: a three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction model. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2003, 31:1182-1193.
24. Koshiba N., Ando J., Chen X., Hisada T. Multiphysics simulation of blood flow and LDL transport in a porohyperelastic arterial wall model. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2007, 129:374-385.
25. Kabinejadian F., Chua L.P., Ghista D.N., Tan Y.S. CABG models flow simulation study on the effects of valve remnants in the venous graft. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology 2010, 10:593-609.
26. Ballyk P.D., Walsh C., Ojha M. Effect of intimal thickening on the stress distribution at an end-to-side graft-artery junction. Hull 1995, vol. 31. ASME, San Francisco, CA.
27. Aoki T., Ku D.N. Collapse of diseased arteries with eccentric cross section. Journal of Biomechanics 1993, 26:133-142.
28. Salzar R.S., Thubrikar M.J., Eppink R.T. Pressure-induced mechanical stress in the carotid artery bifurcation: a possible correlation to atherosclerosis. Journal of Biomechanics 1995, 28:1333-1340.
29. Vorp D.A., Raghavan M.L., Borovetz H.S., Greisler H.P., Webster M.W. Modeling the transmural stress distribution during healing of bioresorbable vascular prostheses. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 1995, 23:178-188.
30. Nichols W.W., O'Rourke M.F. McDonald's blood flow in arteries. Theoretical, experimental and clinical principles 1990, 89. Edward Arnold, London. 3rd ed. W.W. Nichols, M.O. O'Rourke (Eds.).
31. Wesly R.L.R., Vaishnav R.N., Fuchs J.C.A., Patel D.J., Greenfield J.C. Static linear and nonlinear elastic properties of normal and arterialized venous tissue in dog and man. Circulation Research 1975, 37:509-520.
32. Hasegawa H., Kanai H. Measurement of elastic moduli of the arterial wall at multiple frequencies by remote actuation for assessment of viscoelasticity. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers and Short Notes and Review Papers 2004, 43:3197-3203.
33. Gradus-Pizlo I., Bigelow B., Mahomed Y., Sawada S.G., Rieger K., Feigenbaum H. Left anterior descending coronary artery wall thickness measured by high-frequency transthoracic and epicardial echocardiography includes adventitia. American Journal of Cardiology 2003, 91:27-32.
34. Dobrin P.B., Littooy F.N., Endean E.D. Mechanical factors predisposing to intimal hyperplasia and medial thickening in autogenous vein grafts. Surgery 1989, 105:393-400.
35. Hughes T.J.R., Liu W.K., Zimmermann T.K. Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1981, 29:329-349.
36. Bird R.B., Armstrong R.C., Hassager O. Dynamics of polymer liquids 1987, vol. 1. Wiley, New York. 2nd ed.
37. Gijsen F.J.H., Van De Vosse F.N., Janssen J.D. The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: steady flow in a carotid bifurcation model. Journal of Biomechanics 1999, 32:601-608.
38. Galjee M.A., Van Rossum A.C., Doesburg T., Hofman M.B.M., Falke T.H.M., Visser C.A. Quantification of coronary artery bypass graft flow by magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1996, 14:485-493.
39. Womersley J.R. Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. The Journal of Physiology 1955, 127:553-563.
40. Schaar J.A., Regar E., Mastik F., McFadden E.P., Saia F., Disco C., et al. Incidence of high-strain patterns in human coronary arteries: assessment with three-dimensional intravascular palpography and correlation with clinical presentation. Circulation 2004, 109:2716-2719.
41. Zeng D., Boutsianis E., Ammann M., Boomsma K., Wildermuth S., Poulikakos D. A study on the compliance of a right coronary artery and its impact on wall shear stress. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2008, 130:1-11.
42. Atabek H.B., Ling S.C., Patel D.J. Analysis of coronary flow fields in thoracotomized dogs. Circulation Research 1975, 37:752-761.
43. Patel D.J., Fry D.L. In situ pressure-radius-length measurements in ascending aorta of anesthetized dogs. Journal of Applied Physiology 1964, 19:413-416.
44. Bates C.J., O'Doherty D.M., Williams D. Flow instabilities in a graft anastomosis: a study of the instantaneous velocity fields. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 2001, 215:579-587.
45. Chen J., Lu X.Y., Wang W. Non-Newtonian effects of blood flow on hemodynamics in distal vascular graft anastomoses. Journal of Biomechanics 2006, 39:1983-1995.
46. Torii R., Wood N.B., Hadjiloizou N., Dowsey A.W., Wright A.R., Hughes A.D., et al. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of a patient-specific right coronary artery with physiological velocity and pressure waveforms. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 2009, 25:565-580.
47. Wang D.M., Tarbell J.M. Nonlinear analysis of oscillatory flow, with a nonzero mean, in an elastic tube (artery). Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1995, 117:127-135.
48. Lee C.S., Tarbell J.M. Wall shear rate distribution in an abdominal aortic bifurcation model: effects of vessel compliance and phase angle between pressure and flow waveforms. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1997, 119:333-342.
49. Santamarina A., Weydahl E., Siegel J.M., Moore J.E. Computational analysis of flow in a curved tube model of the coronary arteries: effects of time-varying curvature. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 1998, 26:944-954.
50. Zeng D., Ding Z., Friedman M.H., Ross Ethier C. Effects of cardiac motion on right coronary artery hemodynamics. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2003, 31:420-429.
51. Giddens D.P., Zarins C.K., Glagov S. Response of arteries to near-wall fluid dynamics behavior. Applied Mechanics Review 1990, 43:S98-S102.
52. Lieber B.B., Giddens D.P. Post-stenotic core flow behavior in pulsatile flow and its effects on wall shear stress. Journal of Biomechanics 1990, 23:597-605.
53. Zamir M. The physics of pulsatile flow 2000, Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 113-145.