A systematic review of economic evaluations of cardiac rehabilitation

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Wong, Wai Pong ^a,b   Feng, Jun ^c   Pwee, Keng Ho ^b   Lim, Jeremy ^d  

^a SINGAPORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Singapore)

^b MINISTRY OF HEALTH   (Singapore)

^c OPTUM   (United States)

^d Fortis Healthcare Singapore   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; ECONOMICS; HEART FAILURE; HEART INFARCTION; HOME CARE; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT CARE; REVIEW; SINGAPORE;

ADULT; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; COST OF ILLNESS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; HEART FAILURE; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; MALE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; SINGAPORE;

EID: 84864550555     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-243     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: part I: general considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization. Yusuf S, Reddy S, Ounpuu S, Anand S, Circulation 2001 104 22 2746 2753 10.1161/hc4601.099487 11723030
2. Reducing the global burden of cardiovascular disease: the role of risk factors. Levenson JW, Skerrett PJ, Gaziano JM, Prev Cardiol 2002 5 4 188 199 10.1111/j.1520-037X.2002.00564.x 12417828
3. Wenger NK, Froelicher ES, Smith LK, Ades PA, Berra K, Blumenthal JA, Certo CME, Dattilo AM, Davis D, DeBusk RF, et al. Cardiac Rehabilitation. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 17 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Rockville, MD 1995
4. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Balady GJ, Williams MA, Ades PA, Bittner V, Comoss P, Foody JM, Franklin B, Sanderson B, Southard D, Circulation 2007 115 20 2675 2682 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.180945 17513578
5. Universal access: but when? Treating the right patient at the right time: access to cardiac rehabilitation. Dafoe W, Arthur H, Stokes H, Morrin L, Beaton L, Can J Cardiol 2006 22 11 905 911 10.1016/S0828-282X(06)70309-9 16971975
6. An overview of randomized trials of rehabilitation with exercise after myocardial infarction. O'Connor GT, Buring JE, Yusuf S, Goldhaber SZ, Olmstead EM, Paffenbarger RS, Hennekens CH, Circulation 1989 80 2 234 244 10.1161/01.CIR.80.2.234 2665973
7. Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. Combined experience of randomized clinical trials. Oldridge NB, Guyatt GH, Fischer ME, Rimm AA, JAMA 1988 260 7 945 950 10.1001/jama.1988.03410070073031 3398199
8. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, Jolliffe J, Noorani H, Rees K, Skidmore B, Stone JA, Thompson DR, Oldridge N, Am J Med 2004 116 10 682 692 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01. 009 15121495
9. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Heran BS, Chen JM, Ebrahim S, Moxham T, Oldridge N, Rees K, Thompson DR, Taylor RS, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 7 D001800 21735386
10. Economic evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review. Papadakis S, Oldridge NB, Coyle D, Mayhew A, Reid RD, Beaton L, Dafoe WA, Angus D, Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2005 12 6 513 520 16319539
11. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes Oxford University Press, New York 3 2005
12. Cardiac rehabilitation-a cost analysis. Levin LA, Perk J, Hedback B, J Intern Med 1991 230 5 427 434 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1991.tb00468.x 1940778
13. Cardiac rehabilitation participation predicts lower rehospitalization costs. Ades PA, Huang D, Weaver SO, Am Heart J 1992 123 4 Pt 1 916 921 1550000
14. Economic evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation soon after acute myocardial infarction. Oldridge N, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G, Guyatt G, Crowe J, Jones N, Am J Cardiol 1993 72 2 154 161 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90152-3 8328376
15. Cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. Ades PA, Pashkow FJ, Nestor JR, J Cardiopulm Rehabil 1997 17 4 222 231 10.1097/00008483-199707000-00002 9271765
16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of long-term moderate exercise training in chronic heart failure. Georgiou D, Chen Y, Appadoo S, Belardinelli R, Greene R, Parides MK, Glied S, Am J Cardiol 2001 87 8 984 988 A984 10.1016/S0002-9149(01) 01434-5 11305991
17. Improved exercise tolerance and quality of life with cardiac rehabilitation of older patients after myocardial infarction: results of a randomized, controlled trial. Marchionni N, Fattirolli F, Fumagalli S, Oldridge N, Del Lungo F, Morosi L, Burgisser C, Masotti G, Circulation 2003 107 17 2201 2206 10.1161/01.CIR.0000066322.21016.4A 12707240
18. A short course of cardiac rehabilitation programme is highly cost effective in improving long-term quality of life in patients with recent myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention. Yu CM, Lau CP, Chau J, McGhee S, Kong SL, Cheung BM, Li LS, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004 85 12 1915 1922 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.05.010 15605326
19. Costs and effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation for dialysis patients following coronary bypass. Huang Y, Zhang R, Culler SD, Kutner NG, Kidney Int 2008 74 8 1079 1084 10.1038/ki.2008.381 18650790
20. Long-term cost-benefit ratio of cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention. Dendale P, Hansen D, Berger J, Lamotte M, Acta Cardiol 2008 63 4 451 456 10.2143/AC.63.4.2033043 18795582
21. Medically directed at-home rehabilitation soon after clinically uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: a new model for patient care. DeBusk RF, Haskell WL, Miller NH, Berra K, Taylor CB, Berger WE, Lew H, Am J Cardiol 1985 55 4 251 257 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90355-8 3969859
22. The cost-effectiveness of exercise training for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Lowensteyn I, Coupal L, Zowall H, Grover SA, J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2000 20 3 147 155 10.1097/00008483-200005000-00002 10860196
23. Program participation, exercise adherence, cardiovascular outcomes, and program cost of traditional versus modified cardiac rehabilitation. Carlson JJ, Johnson JA, Franklin BA, VanderLaan RL, Am J Cardiol 2000 86 1 17 23 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)00822-5 10867086
24. Cost-analysis of gym-based versus home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs. Collins L, Scuffham P, Gargett S, Aust Health Rev 2001 24 1 51 61 10.1071/AH010051 11357742
25. Impact of program duration and contact frequency on efficacy and cost of cardiac rehabilitation: results of a randomized trial. Reid RD, Dafoe WA, Morrin L, Mayhew A, Papadakis S, Beaton L, Oldridge NB, Coyle D, Wells GA, Am Heart J 2005 149 5 862 868 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.09.029 15894969
26. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation versus hospital-based rehabilitation: a cost effectiveness analysis. Taylor RS, Watt A, Dalal HM, Evans PH, Campbell JL, Read KL, Mourant AJ, Wingham J, Thompson DR, Pereira Gray DJ, Int J Cardiol 2007 119 2 196 201 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.07.218 17084927
27. Cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation program delivery models in patients at varying cardiac risk, reason for referral, and sex. Papadakis S, Reid RD, Coyle D, Beaton L, Angus D, Oldridge N, Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2008 15 3 347 353 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f5ffab 18525392
28. The Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation study (BRUM): a randomised controlled trial comparing home-based with centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Jolly K, Lip GY, Taylor RS, Raftery J, Mant J, Lane D, Greenfield S, Stevens A, Heart 2009 95 1 36 42 18332063
29. Intervention study shows outpatient cardiac rehabilitation to be economically at least as attractive as inpatient rehabilitation. Schweikert B, Hahmann H, Steinacker JM, Imhof A, Muche R, Koenig W, Liu Y, Leidl R, Clin Res Cardiol 2009 98 12 787 795 10.1007/s00392-009-0081-6 19821135
30. Can a disease self-management program reduce health care costs? The case of older women with heart disease. Wheeler JR, Janz NK, Dodge JA, Med Care 2003 41 6 706 715 12773836
31. Clinical trial of an Internet-based case management system for secondary prevention of heart disease. Southard BH, Southard DR, Nuckolls J, J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2003 23 5 341 348 10.1097/00008483-200309000-00003 14512778
32. How much do the benefits cost? Effects of a home-based training programme on cardiovascular fitness, quality of life, programme cost and adherence for patients with coronary disease. Salvetti XM, Oliveira JA, Servantes DM, Vincenzo de Paola AA, Clin Rehabil 2008 22 10-11 987 996 18955430
33. Economic evaluation of a randomised trial of early return to normal activities versus cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction. Hall JP, Wiseman VL, King MT, Ross DL, Kovoor P, Zecchin RP, Moir FM, Denniss AR, Heart Lung Circ 2002 11 1 10 18 10.1046/j.1444-2892.2002.00105.x 16352063