CREATING A LANDSCAPE OF MEMORY: THE POTENTIAL OF HUMANITIES GIS

International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 97-110

  Bodenhamer, David J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864545191     PISSN: 17538548     EISSN: 17551706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3366/E1753854808000207     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Similar experiences are common in the mapping of community information, as reported by a Government Accountability Office study, Informing our nation, GAO-05-01 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2005).
2. D. Weiner, T. M. Harris, and W. J. Craig, ‘Community participation and geographic information systems’, in W. J. Craig, ed., Community participation and geographic information systems (London: Taylor and Francis, 2002), 3–16.
3. C. Lin, C. Chang, B. Tsai, C. Lee, T. Ding, and Y. Li, ‘Applying public participation geographic information systems to the study of the traditional territories of indigenous peoples—a case of Atayal Smangus community’, Journal of geographical science, 41(2005), 65–82.
4. E. Welty, ‘Place in fiction,’ in E. Welty, The eye of the stormy selected essays and reviews (New York: Random House, 1978), 119.
5. Roberto Maria Dainotto discusses the postcolonial connection of place and literature in ‘“All the regions do smilingly revolt”: the literature of place and region’, Critical Inquiry, 22, (Spring, 1996), 486–505.
6. Denis Cosgrove discusses this spatial turn specifically in relation to landscapes, real and figurative, in ‘Landscape and landschaft’, GHI Bulletin, 35 (Fall 2004), 57–71.
7. K. Olwig, Landscape, nature and the body politic: from Britain’s renaissance to America’s new world (Madison, Wisc.: University of Wisconsin Press, 2002).
8. Yi-Tu Tuan discusses the emotional and perceptual meanings of space in several books, including Space and place: the perspective of experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977)
9. Place, art, and self (Santa Fe, New Mexico: Center for American Places, 2004)
10. Landscapes of fear (New York: Pantheon Books, 1979).
11. D. Massey, Space, place, and gender (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1994), especially 1–24.
12. W. Blake, ‘Milton: a poem in 2 books. Milton: book the second’, in D. V. Erdman, ed., The complete poetry and prose of William Blake. Electronic Edition, Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, University of Virginia. 2001. http://www.blakearchive.org/blake/erdman.html.
13. M. F. Goodchild and D. G. Janelle, ‘Thinking spatially in the social sciences’, in M. F. Goodchild and D. G. Janelle, eds., Spatially integrated social science (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 3–17.
14. J. L. Gaddis, The landscape of history: how historians map the past (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), Ch. 4.
15. T. Carlyle, ‘On History’, in F. Stern, ed., The varieties of history: from Voltaire to the present (New York: Vintage Books, 1972), 95.
16. D. R. Hofstadter, Le ton beau de Marot: in praise of the music of languages (New York: Basic Books, 1997), 305.
17. M. Jessor, ‘The visualisation of spatial data in the humanities’, Literary and linguistic computing, 19 (2004), 335–350.
18. D. J. Staley, Computers, visualszation, and history: how new technology will transform our understanding of the past (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2003).
19. “Burnt Norton” in T. S. Eliot, Complete poems and plays, 1909–1950 (New York: Harcourt, 1952).
20. Paul Carter, The road to Botany Bay (London: Faber & Faber,1987), 1–3.
21. ‘Culture of Coincidence: Notes on a Performance Piece called ‘Mirror States’, Continuum: the Australian journal of media & culture, 3 (1990), 126.
22. P. Roe, ‘Textual tourism: negotiating the spaces of reading,” SPAN: journal of the South Pacific association for commonwealth literature and language studies, 33 (1992), 91.
23. M. J. P. Wolf and B. Perron, eds., The video game theory reader (New York: Routledge, 2003) offers a good introduction to game studies.
24. The literature on memory is vast, but a handy introduction may be found in John Sutton, ‘Memory’, Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/memory/.
25. K. E. Foote, Shadowed ground: America’s landscape of violence and tragedy (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1997).
26. Geographer D. Lowenthal has reminded us that we ‘alter our tangible pasts to make history conform with memory,’ in ‘Past time, present place: landscape and memory’, Geographical review, 65 (1975), 31.
27. J. Bodnar, Remaking America: public memory, commemoration, and patriotism in the twentieth century (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1992), 13–20.
28. PrairyErth (A deep map): an epic history of the tallgrass prairie country (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1991).
29. M. Pearson and M. Shanks, Theatre/Archaeology (London: Routledge, 2001), 64–65.
30. An attempt to create a ‘deep map’ is found in the Three Landscapes Project, a Stanford University collaboration involving an artist, a theologian, and an archaeologist. The result may be seen at http://metamedia.stanford.edu/∼mshanks/threelandscapes/index.html.
31. Guy-Ernest Debord, a leader of the Situationalist International, described psychogeography as ‘the study of the precise laws and specific effects of the geographical environment, consciously organized or not, on the emotions and behavior of individuals.’ ‘Introduction to a critique of urban geography’, Les Levres Nues, 6 (1955), as republished at http://library.nothingness.org/articles/SI/en/display/2.
32. S. Clifford and A. King, England in particular: a celebration of the commonplace, the local, the vernacular and the distinctive (London: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd., 2006).
33. Peter Novak discusses in his prizewinning monograph, That noble dream: the ‘objectivity’ question and the American historical profession (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
34. M. Kwan, ‘Feminist visualisation: re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research’, Annals of the association of American geographers, 92 (2002), 645–661.