A framework for engaging diverse communities in Citizen science in the US

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 314-317

  Pandya, Rajul E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CORPORATION FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOCAL PARTICIPATION; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; RESEARCH WORK; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84864540717     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/120007     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Ballard HL and Huntsinger L. 2006. Salal harvester local ecological knowledge, harvest practices and understory management on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington. Hum Ecol; doi: 10.1007/s10745-006-9048-7. (Pubitemid 44490015)
2. Bang M, Medin DL, and Atran S. 2007. Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104:13868-74. (Pubitemid 350003309)
3. Bell P, Lewenstein B, Shouse AW, and Feder M. 2009. Learning science in informal environments: people, places and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
4. Berkes F and Colding J. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10:1251-62. (Pubitemid 32139993)
5. Brossard D, Lewenstein B, and Bonney R. 2005. Scientific knowledge and attitude change: the impact of a citizen science project. Int J Sci Educ 27:1099-1121. (Pubitemid 41030400)
6. Button GV and Peterson K. 2009. Participatory action research: community partnership with social and physical scientists in anthropology and climate change. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
7. Eden S. 2006. Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions. Public Underst Sci 5:183-204.
8. Evans C, Abrams E, Reitsma R, et al. 2005. The Neighborhood Nestwatch Program: participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conserv Biol 19:589-94. (Pubitemid 40764520)
9. Fazey I, Kesby M, Evely A, et al. 2010. A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands. Global Environ Chang 20:713-28.
10. Gurin P. 1999. The compelling need for diversity in education. U Mass Sch Educ J 32:36-62.
11. Huntington HP. 2000. Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecol Appl 10:1270-74. (Pubitemid 32139995)
12. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, and Becker AB. 1998. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Publ Health 19:173-202. (Pubitemid 28279929)
13. Jolly EC. 2009. Confronting demographic denial: retaining relevance in the new millennium. J Mus Educ 27:2-4.
14. Levine R, González R, and Martínez-Sussmann C. 2009. Learner diversity in Earth system science. Paper prepared for the Committee for the Review of the NOAA Education Program. Washington, DC: National Research Council. www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/NOAA%20Diversity.pdf. Viewed 12 Dec. 2011.
15. Riggs EM. 2005. Field-based education and indigenous knowledge: essential components of geoscience education for Native American communities. Sci Educ 89:296-313. (Pubitemid 41359124)
16. Trumbull DJ, Bonney R, Bascom D, and Cabral A. 2000. Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Sci Educ 84:265-75.
17. Wilderman CC, Barron A, and Imgrund L. 2004. Top down or bottom up? ALLARMs experience with two operational models for community science. Proceedings of the 4th National Monitoring Conference; 17-20 May 2004; Chattanooga, TN. Washington, DC: National Water Quality Monitoring Council. http://acwi.gov/monitoring/conference/2004/proceedings-contents/13-titlepages/ posters/poster-235.pdf.