Hydrologic sensitivities of Colorado River runoff to changes in precipitation and temperature

Journal of Hydrometeorology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 932-949

  Vano, Julie A ^a   Das, Tapash ^b,c   Lettenmaier, Dennis P ^a  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

^b San Diego   (United States)

^c CH2M HILL   (United States)

Author keywords

Bias; Climate sensitivity; Hydrology; Land surface model; Streamflow; Water budget

Indexed keywords

AIR TEMPERATURE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; HYDROLOGY; LAND SURFACE; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); RIVER FLOW; RUNOFF; STREAMFLOW; WATER BUDGET;

COLORADO RIVER [NORTH AMERICA]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84864539669     PISSN: 1525755X     EISSN: 15257541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-11-069.1     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anderson, E. A., 1973: National Weather Service River Forecast System: Snow accumulation and ablation model. NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS-HYDRO-17, 217
2. Barnett, T. P., and D. W. Pierce, 2009: Sustainable water deliveries from the Colorado River in a changing climate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 7334-7338, doi:10.1073/pnas.0812762106.
3. Blinn, D. W., and N. L. Poff, 2005: Colorado River basin. Rivers of NorthAmerica,A. Benke and C. E. Cushing, Eds.,Academic Press, 483-538.
4. Boone, A., et al., 2004: The Rône-Aggregation Land Surface Scheme intercomparison project: An overview. J. Climate, 17, 187-208.
5. Burnash, R. J. C., R. L. Ferral, and R. A. McGuire, 1973: A generalized streamflow simulation system: Conceptual models for digital computers. Joint Federal and State River Forecast Center, U.S. National Weather Service and California Department of Water Resources Tech. Rep., 204
6. Cayan, D. R., T. Das, D. W. Pierce, T. P. Barnett, M. Tyree, and A. Gershunov, 2010: Future dryness in the southwest US and the hydrology of the early 21st century drought. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 21 271-21 276, doi:10.1073/pnas.0912391107.
7. Christensen, N. S., and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2007: A multimodel ensemble approach to assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 3, 1-44.
8. Christensen, N. S., A. W. Wood, N. Voisin, D. P. Lettenmaier, and R. N. Palmer, 2004: The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River Basin. Climatic Change, 62, 337-363.
9. Donohue, R. J., T. R. McVicar, and M. L. Roderick, 2010: Assessing the ability of potential evaporation formulations to capture the dynamics in evaporative demand within a changing climate. J. Hydrol., 386 (1-4), 186-197, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.020.
10. Dooge, J. C. I., 1992: Sensitivity of runoff to climate change: A Hortonian approach. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 73, 2013-2024.
11. Dooge, J. C. I., M. Bruen, and B. Parmentier, 1999: A simple model for estimating the sensitivity of runoff to long-termchanges in precipitation without a change in vegetation. Adv. Water Resour., 23, 153-163, doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(99)00019-6.
12. Ducharne,A., R. D. Koster,M. J. Suarez, M. Stieglitz, and P. Kumar, 2000: A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model 2. Parameter estimation and model demonstration. J. Geophys. Res., 105 (D20), 24 823-24 838.
13. Easterling. 1997: Maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe. Science, 227, 364-367.
14. Elsner, M. M.,et al. 2010: Implications of 21st century climate change for the hydrology of Washington State. Climatic Change, 102 (1-2), 225-260, doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9855-0.
15. Fu, G., S. P. Charles, and F. H. S. Chiew, 2007: A two-parameter climate elasticity of streamflow index to assess climate change effects on annual streamflow. Water Resour. Res., 43, W11419, doi:10.1029/2007WR005890.
16. Gardner, L. R., 2009: Assessing the effect of climate change on mean annual runoff. J. Hydrol., 379, 351-359, doi:10.1016/ j.jhydrol.2009.10.021.
17. Hamlet, A. F., and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2005: Production of temporally consistent gridded precipitation and temperature fields for the continental United States. J. Hydrometeor., 6, 330-336.
18. Henderson-Sellers, A., A. J. Pitman, P. K. Love, P. Irannejad, and T. H. Chen, 1995: The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 76, 489-503.
19. Hoerling, M., and J. K. Eischeid, 2007: Past peak water in the southwest. Southwest Hydrol., 6, 18-35.
20. Hoerling, M., D. P. Lettenmaier,D. Cayan, and B. Udall, 2009: Reconciling projections of Colorado River streamflow. Southwest Hydrol., 8, 20-21, 31.
21. Jeton, A. E.,M. D. Dettinger, and J. L. Smith, 1996: Potential effects of climate change on streamflow, eastern and western slopes of the Sierra Nevada, California and Nevada. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Rep. 95-4260, 44
22. Kavetski, D., and M. P. Clark, 2011: Numerical troubles in conceptual hydrology: Approximations, absurdities and impact on hypothesis testing. Hydrol. Processes, 25, 661-670, doi:10.1002/ hyp.7899.
23. Koster, R. D., and P. C. D. Milly, 1997: The interplay between transpiration and runoff formulations in land surface schemes used with atmospheric models. J. Climate, 10, 1578-1591.
24. Koster, R. D., M. J. Suarez, A. Ducharne, M. Stieglitz, and P. Kumar, 2000: Acatchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model 1. Model structure. J. Geophys. Res., 105 (D20), 24 809-24 822.
25. Liang, X., D. P. Lettenmaier, E. F. Wood, and S. J. Burges, 1994:A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (D7), 14 415-14 428.
26. Livneh, B., Y. Xia, K. E. Mitchell, M. B. Ek, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2010: Noah LSM snow model diagnostics and enhancements. J. Hydrometeor., 11, 721-738.
27. Lohmann, D., R. Nolte-Holube, and E. Raschke, 1996: A largescale horizontal routing model to be coupled to land surface parameterization schemes. Tellus, 48, 708-721.
28. Lohmann, D., R. E. Raschke, B. Nijssen, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 1998: Regional scale hydrology: I. Formulation of the VIC-2L model coupled to a routing model. Hydrol. Sci. J., 43, 131-141.
29. Lohmann, D., et al. 2004: Streamflow and water balance intercomparisons of four land surfacemodels in theNorthAmerican Land Data Assimilation System project. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07S91, doi:10.1029/2003JD003517.
30. Maurer, E. P., A. W. Wood, J. C. Adam, D. P. Lettenmaier, and B. Nijssen, 2002: A long-term hydrologically based data set of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. J. Climate, 15, 3237-3251.
31. McMahon, T. A., 1982: Hydrological characteristics of selected rivers of the world. UNESCO Tech. Docs. in Hydrology SC-82/WS/51, 41
32. Milly, P. C. D., K. A. Dunne, and A. V. Vecchia, 2005: Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature, 438, 347-350.
33. Mitchell, K. E.et al. 2004: The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07S90, doi:10.1029/2003JD003823.
34. Nijssen, B., R. Schnur, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2001: Global retrospective estimation of soil moisture using the Variable Infiltration Capacity land surface model, 1980-1993. J. Climate, 14, 1790-1808.
35. Oleson, K. W.et al., 2004: Technical description of the Community Land Model (CLM). National Center for Atmospheric Research Tech. Note NCAR/TN-4611STR, 173 [Available online at http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/tss/clm/distribution/ clm3.0/TechNote/CLM_Tech_Note.pdf.]
36. Oleson, K. W.et al., 2007: CLM 3.5 documentation. NCAR Tech. Rep., 34 pp. [Available online at http://www.cgd.ucar./tss/clm/distribution/clm3.5/CLM3_5_documentation.pd f.]
37. Oleson, K. W.et al., 2008: Improvements to the Community Land Model and their impact on the hydrological cycle. J. Geophys. Res., 113, G01021, doi:10.1029/2007JG000563.
38. Overpeck, J., and B. Udall, 2010: Dry times ahead. Science, 328, 1642-1643, doi:10.1126/science.1186591.
39. Pitman, A. J. et al. 1999: Key results and implications from phase 1(c) of the Project for Intercomparison of Landsurface Parameterization Schemes. Climate Dyn., 15, 673-684.
40. Ray, A. J., J. J. Barsugli, K. B. Averyt, K. Wolter, M. Hoerling, N. Doesken, B. Udall, and R. S. Webb, 2008: Climate change in Colorado: A synthesis to support water resource management and adaptation. Colorado Water Conservation Board Rep., 52 pp. [Available online at http://cwcb.state.co.us/ public-information/publications/Documents/ReportsStudies/ ClimateChangeReportFull.pdf.]
41. Sankarasubramanian, A., R. M. Vogel, and J. F. Limbrunner, 2001: Climate elasticity of streamflow in the United States. Water Resour. Res., 37, 1771-1781.
42. Schaake, J. C., 1990: From climate to flow. Climate Change and U.S. Water Resources, P. E. Waggoner, Ed., John Wiley, 177-206.
43. Seager, R., et al. 2007: Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science, 316, 1181-1184.
44. Solomon, S., D. Qin,M.Manning,M.Marquis, K. Averyt, M. M. B. Tignor, H. L. Miller Jr., and Z. Chen, Eds., 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, 996
45. Thornton, P. E., and S. W. Running, 1999: An improved algorithm for estimating incident daily solar radiation from measurements of temperature, humidity, and precipitation. Agric. For. Meteor., 93, 211-228.
46. USBR, cited 2010: CURRENT natural flow data 1906-2007. [Available online at http://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/NaturalFlow/ current.html.]
47. Wang, A., T. J. Bohn, S. P. Mahanama, R. D. Koster, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2009: Multimodel ensemble reconstruction of drought over the continental United States. J. Climate, 22, 2694-2712.
48. Wei, H., Y. Xia, K. E. Mitchell, and M. B. Ek, 2012: Improvement of the Noah land surface model for warm season processes: Evaluation of water and energy flux simulation. Hydrol. Processes, doi:10.1002/hyp.9214, in press.
49. Wood, A. W., and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2006: A test bed for new seasonal hydrologic forecasting approaches in the western United States. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87, 1699-1712.
50. Zheng, H., L. Zhang, R. Zhu, C. Liu, Y. Sato, and Y. Fukushima, 2009: Responses of streamflow to climate and land surface change in the headwaters of the Yellow River Basin. Water Resour. Res., 45, W00A19, doi:10.1029/2007WR006665.