Coalitions for a common purpose: Managing relationships in experiments

Journal of Experimental Criminology

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 211-225

  Strang, Heather ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Coalitions; Evaluation research; Field manager; Implementation issues; Managing experiments; Research relationships

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864535129     PISSN: 15733750     EISSN: 15728315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-012-9148-x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Berk, R. (2005). Randomized experiments as the bronze standard. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(4), 414-431.
2. Boruch, R. (1997). Randomized experiments for planning and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Burns, JM. (1978). Leadership. New York, Harper & Row.
4. Braga, A., & Hinkle, M. (2010). The participation of academics in the criminal justice working group process. In J. Klofas, N. Hipple, & E. McGarrell (Eds.), The new criminal justice (pp. 114-120). New York: Routledge.
5. Farrington, D., Ohlin, L., & Wilson, J. Q. (1986). Understanding and controlling crime. New York: Springer.
6. Feder, L., Jolin, A., & Feyderherm, W. (2000). Lessons from two randomized experiments in criminal justice settings. Crime and Delinquency, 46(3), 380-400.
7. Feder, L., Niolon, P. H., Campbell, J., Wallinder, J., Nelson, R., & Larrouy, H. (2011). The need for experimental methodology in intimate partner violence: Finding programs that effectively prevent IPV. Violence Against Women, 17(3), 341-360.
8. Garner, J., & Visher, C. (1988). Experiments help shape new policies (Report No. 211). Washington DC: National Institute of Justice Reports.
9. Gerth, H. H., & Wright Mills, C. (1948) (1991). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge.
10. Greene, J. (2010). Collaborations between police and research/academic organisations: some prescriptions from the field. In J. Klofas, N. Hipple, & E. McGarrell (Eds.), The new criminal justice (pp. 121-127). New York: Routledge.
11. Handy, C. (1993). Understanding organizations (4th ed.). London: Penguin Books.
12. Hutt, M. D., Walker, B. A., Frankwick, G. L. (1995). 'Hurdle the Cross-Functional Barriers to Strategic Change', Sloan Management Review, pp 22-30.
13. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional Leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768.
14. Mizrahi, T., & Morrison, J. D. (1993). Community organization and social administration: Advances, trends and emerging principles. Binghampton, NY: Haworth Press.
15. Petersilia, J. (1989). Implementing randomized experiments: Lessons learned from BJA's intensive supervision program. Evaluation Review, 13(5), 435-458.
16. Ross, L., & Blumenthal, M. (1975). Some problems in experimentation in a legal setting. The American Sociologist, 10, 150-155.
17. Rubin, B. R. (1997). A citizen's guide to politics in america: How the system works and how to work the system'. Armonk NY: M. E. Sharpe.
18. Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Dignan, E., et al. (2004). Implementing restorative justice schemes (Crime Reduction Programme): A report on the first year. Home Office Online Report 32/04. London: Home Office.
19. Shapland, J., Atkinson, A. et al. (2006). Restorative justice in practice: findings from the second phase of the evaluation of three schemes. Findings 274. London: Home Office. http://www. homeoffice. gov. uk/rds/pubinto1. html.
20. Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., et al. (2007). Restorative justice: The views of victims and offenders. The third report from the evaluation of three schemes. Ministry of Justice Research Series 3/07. London: Ministry of Justice.
21. Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Dignan, J., Edwards, L., Hibbert, J., et al. (2008). Does restorative justice affect reconviction? The fourth report from the evaluation of three schemes. Ministry of Justice Research Series 10/08. London: Ministry of Justice.
22. Sherman, L. W. (1992). The influence of criminology on criminal law: Evaluating arrests for misdemeanor domestic violence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 1.
23. Strang, H. (2002). Repair or revenge: Victims and restorative justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Strang, H., & Braithwaite, J. (eds) (2001), Restorative Justice and Civil Society. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
25. 'Student' (WS Gosset) (1931). 'The Lanarkshire milk experiment'. Biometrika, 23(3/4), 398-406.
26. Weisburd, D. (2000). Randomized experiments in criminal justice policy: Prospects and problems. Crime and Delinquency, 46(2), 181-193.
27. Weisburd, D. (2005). Hot spot policing experiments and criminal justice research: Lessons from the field. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 599, 220-245.
28. Weisburd, D., Petrosino, A., & Mason, G. (1993). Design sensitivity in criminal justice experiments. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.