Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies [3]

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 367, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 476-477

  Kirtane, Ajay J ^a   Pinto, Duane S ^b   Moses, Jeffrey W ^a  

^a NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^b BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DATA BASE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; LETTER; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURGICAL INELIGIBILITY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; MALE; NOTE; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PREVALENCE; STROKE;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 84864515564     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1206011     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Weintraub WS, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Weiss JM, et al. Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1467-76.
2. McNulty EJ, Ng W, Spertus JA, et al. Surgical candidacy and selection biases in nonemergent left main stenting: implications for observational studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:1020-7.