A study of the development of critical thinking skills using an innovative web 2.0 tool

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 752-756

  Eales Reynolds, Lesley Jane ^a   Gillham, David ^b   Grech, Carol ^c   Clarke, Colin ^d   Cornell, Jacqueline ^c  

^a KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Critical thinking; E pedagogy; Higher education; Web 2.0; Web resource appraisal process; WRAP

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STUDENT; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL MEDIA;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; HUMANS; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; SOCIAL MEDIA; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 84864514252     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: 15322793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Acro (Last accessed, September 20th, 2009). http://www.cds-web.net/acro_index.html.
2. Biggs J. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education 1996, 32:1-18.
3. Birenbaum M., Dochy F.J.R.C. Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge 1996, Kluwer Academic Purbishers, Boston, MS.
4. Darling-Hammond L., Snyder J. Authentic assessment in teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education 2000, 16:523-545.
5. Griffiths J., Brophy P. Student searching behavior and the web: use of academic resources and Google (Retrieved on 30 March 2012 from). http://hdl.handle.net/2142/1749.
6. Grimes D., Boening C. Worries with the Web: A look at student use of Web resources. College and Research Libraries 2001, 62:11-23.
7. Gulikers J., Bastiaens Th., Kirschner P. Defining authentic assessment: five dimensions of authenticity. Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education 2007, Routledge, New York. A. Havnes, L. McDowell (Eds.).
8. Herrington J., Herrington A. Authentic assessment and multimedia. How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment. Higher Educational Research and Development 1998, 17(3):385-322.
9. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011, (Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org). J. Higgins, S. Green (Eds.).
10. Judd T., Kennedy G. A five-year study of on-campus Internet use by undergraduate biomedical students. Computers in Education 2010, 55(4):1564-1571.
11. Lea M., Jones S. Digital literacies in higher education: exploring textual and technological practice. Studies in Higher Education 2011, 36(4):377-393. 10.1080/03075071003664021.
12. Learning Space (last accessed, September 20th, 2009). http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/.
13. LOREnet (last accessed, September 20th, 2009). http://www.surffoundation.nl/en/themas/elearning/onderwijsrepositorieslorenet/Pages/Default.aspx.
14. McLoughlin C., Lee M. Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: international exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2010, 26(1):28-43.
15. Mill D. Undergraduate information resource choices. College and Research Libraries 2008, 69(4):342-355.
16. Modritscher F., Spiel S. Assessment in E-Learning Environments: A Comparison of three Methods (last accessed January 3rd, 2012). http://www.moedritscher.com/papers/paper_moedritscher_et_al_eassessment_2006.pdf.
17. Sackett D., Rosenberg W., Gray J., Haynes R., Richardson W. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996, 312(7023):71-72.
18. Savery J., Duffy T. Problem-based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educations Technology 1995, 35:31-38.
19. Younger P. Internet-based information-seeking behaviour amongst doctors and nurses: a short review of the literature. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2010, 27:2-10.